<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pamlico Sound Archives | Coastal Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://coastalreview.org/tag/pamlico-sound/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>A Daily News Service of the North Carolina Coastal Federation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 16:49:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Pamlico Sound cultch harvest sites open through March 31</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2026/02/pamlico-sound-cultch-harvest-sites-open-through-march-31/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 16:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisheries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oysters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coastalreview.org/?p=104096</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="740" height="416" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr.jpg 740w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-400x225.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-200x112.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-636x358.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-482x271.jpg 482w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-320x180.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-239x134.jpg 239w" sizes="(max-width: 740px) 100vw, 740px" />The Division of Marine Fisheries reminds commercial fishermen and the public that four rotational harvest cultch sites in the Pamlico Sound remain open to mechanical oyster harvest.
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="740" height="416" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr.jpg 740w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-400x225.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-200x112.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-636x358.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-482x271.jpg 482w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-320x180.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-239x134.jpg 239w" sizes="(max-width: 740px) 100vw, 740px" /><div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img decoding="async" width="740" height="416" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-49766" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr.jpg 740w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-400x225.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-200x112.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-636x358.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-482x271.jpg 482w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-320x180.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Oyster-shell-ncdcr-239x134.jpg 239w" sizes="(max-width: 740px) 100vw, 740px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Oyster shell. Photo: NCDCR</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>Four rotational harvest cultch sites in the Pamlico Sound are to remain open until March 31, unless it&#8217;s deemed necessary to close these 10-acre sites sooner, the N.C. Department of Environmental Quality’s Division of Marine Fisheries announced Friday.</p>



<p>The sites are part of the N.C. Oyster Fishery Management Plan&#8217;s amendment 5, &#8220;which balances harvest opportunities with sustainability by allowing harvest on managed cultch planting sites while protecting oyster habitat in other areas of the Pamlico Sound,&#8221; the division said. Cultch sites are oyster reefs the planted in places with the right environmental conditions. </p>



<p>The division rotates which cultch sites are open to mechanical harvest to provide continued opportunities later in the season while supporting the division’s &#8220;extensive cultch planting program and long-term management goals for the resource.&#8221;</p>



<p>The following sites are open from sunrise to 2 p.m. Monday through Friday, in accordance with existing gear, tagging and size limit requirements, and are subject to daily harvest limits of adjacent areas as outlined in a proclamation:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Up to 15 bushels a day in Turnagain Bay no. 1 in the Neuse River management area.</li>



<li>Up to 10 bushels a day in Jones Bay No. 1 in the Neuse River management aArea. </li>



<li>Up to 15 bushels in Crab Hole No. 2 in the Northern Dare management area.</li>



<li>Up to 15 bushels a day in Swan Quarter No. 2 in the Pamlico River management area.</li>
</ul>



<p>These sites are marked with buoys and orange flags. Coordinates for the sites are <a href="https://www.deq.nc.gov/news/press-releases/2026/02/13/rotational-harvest-cultch-sites-remain-open-mechanical-oyster-harvest-pamlico-sound" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">in the press release</a>.  </p>



<p>The division reminded commercial fishermen and the public that mechanical oyster harvest seasons were closed:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Jan 9 in the bays of the Neuse River, Pamlico River and northern Hyde management areas.</li>



<li>Jan. 16 in the open waters of the Pamlico River and Neuse River areas.</li>



<li>Jan. 30 in the northern Hyde area.</li>
</ul>



<p>For more information the state&#8217;s oyster management plan, <a href="http://chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.deq.nc.gov/marine-fisheries/fisheries-management/oyster/oyster-fmp-amendment-5/open" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">visit the division&#8217;s website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mechanical oyster season extended in parts of Pamlico Sound</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2025/12/mechanical-oyster-season-extended-in-parts-of-pamlico-sound/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 15:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisheries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oysters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coastalreview.org/?p=102827</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="640" height="426" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/oysters_0.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/oysters_0.jpg 640w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/oysters_0-400x266.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/oysters_0-200x133.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/oysters_0-600x400.jpg 600w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" />Beginning last Monday, the mechanical oyster harvest season is extended in portions of Pamlico Sound.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="640" height="426" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/oysters_0.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/oysters_0.jpg 640w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/oysters_0-400x266.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/oysters_0-200x133.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/oysters_0-600x400.jpg 600w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /><div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="640" height="426" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/oysters_0.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-67545" style="width:684px;height:auto" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/oysters_0.jpg 640w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/oysters_0-400x266.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/oysters_0-200x133.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/oysters_0-600x400.jpg 600w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The mechanical oyster harvest season has been extended in portions of Pamlico Sounc.</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>The mechanical oyster harvest season has been extended in portions of Pamlico Sound.</p>



<p>The extension, which began Monday, is a result of &#8220;adaptive management measures that included collaboration with stakeholders,&#8221; according to a North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries release.</p>



<p>&#8220;The Division&#8217;s annual mid-season sampling of the mechanical oyster harvest areas showed the numbers of legal sized oysters in several management areas of the Pamlico Sound met the management thresholds established in Amendment 5 to extend the season,&#8221; the release states.</p>



<p>That <a href="https://www.deq.nc.gov/marine-fisheries/fisheries-management/oyster/oyster-fmp-amendment-5/open?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=govdelivery" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">amendment</a> in the North Carolina Eastern Oyster Fishery Management Plan includes a provision that links mechanical oyster harvest management in the Pamlico Sound to the state&#8217;s cultch planting efforts, where season length is based on pre- and mid-season sampling of oyster resources.</p>



<p>Commercial fishermen helped the division identify sampling sites.</p>



<p>The division is maintaining closures in <a href="https://files.nc.gov/deq/documents/2025-12/SF-7-2025_Oyster%20Mechanical%20Harvest%20Opening-Final.pdf?VersionId=75pz4Md_Jh0wHIKAtV3nGe.rzPQVdSi0&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=govdelivery" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Deep-Water Oyster Recovery Areas</a> designated to protect sensitive habitat.</p>



<p>Select rotational harvest cultch sites identified in Amendment 5 remain open for the entirety of the mechanical harvest season through March 31, 2026.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doomed to repeat history: What&#8217;s in future for NC wetlands?</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2025/04/doomed-to-repeat-history-whats-in-future-for-nc-wetlands/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morty Gaskill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coastal economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture and history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisheries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Coastal Federation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ocracoke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seafood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wetlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WOTUS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coastalreview.org/?p=96109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="432" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Ocracoke-winter-PXL_20221231_-768x432.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Ocracoke in winter. Photo: Peter Vankevich" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Ocracoke-winter-PXL_20221231_-768x432.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Ocracoke-winter-PXL_20221231_-400x225.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Ocracoke-winter-PXL_20221231_-200x113.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Ocracoke-winter-PXL_20221231_.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />Guest commentary: Ignoring the past guarantees a grim future for our coastal communities, as the fishermen of Rose Bay warned decades ago. Will we listen now, or once again pay the price for failing to protect our way of life?]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="432" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Ocracoke-winter-PXL_20221231_-768x432.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Ocracoke in winter. Photo: Peter Vankevich" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Ocracoke-winter-PXL_20221231_-768x432.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Ocracoke-winter-PXL_20221231_-400x225.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Ocracoke-winter-PXL_20221231_-200x113.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Ocracoke-winter-PXL_20221231_.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /><div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img decoding="async" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Ocracoke-winter-PXL_20221231_.jpg" alt="Ocracoke in winter. Photo: Peter Vankevich/Ocracoke Observer"/><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Ocracoke in winter. Photo: Peter Vankevich/<a href="https://ocracokeobserver.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ocracoke Observer</a></figcaption></figure>
</div>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Guest Commentary</em></h2>



<p><em>To stimulate discussion and debate, Coastal Review welcomes differing viewpoints on topical coastal issues.&nbsp;Morty Gaskill is a member of the North Carolina Coastal Federation Board of Directors. The nonprofit advocacy organization publishes Coastal Review, which remains editorially independent.</em></p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p>In 1976, a <a href="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/cw_1976_08_Aug.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">North Carolina Sea Grant newsletter</a> sounded the alarm: large-scale land drainage was wiping out wetlands that protect our coastal fisheries. Fishermen saw their livelihoods at risk and 3,000 of them pleaded for action.</p>



<p>“We, the undersigned, being commercial and sport fishermen who use the creeks, rivers, and bays adjacent to Pamlico Sound and the waters of Pamlico Sound, petition the Marine Fisheries Commission and state officials as follows: &#8230; to investigate the effect of changing salinity in said waters upon the economy of Pamlico Drainage areas and to initiate proper controls to insure the continued health of commercial and sport fishing in this area.”</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-medium"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="262" height="400" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Morty-Gaskill-262x400.png" alt="Morty Gaskill is a commercial fisherman and native of Ocracoke who graduated from North Carolina State University in 2017 with a degree in history." class="wp-image-96136" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Morty-Gaskill-262x400.png 262w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Morty-Gaskill-131x200.png 131w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Morty-Gaskill.png 402w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 262px) 100vw, 262px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Morty Gaskill</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>They saw it coming. But there was hope &#8212; state and federal leaders acted. For decades, farming, forestry, development, and fisheries co-existed under federal and state wetland safeguards — rules that carefully balanced economic growth and environmental protection. These safeguards didn’t create unbearable hardships; they provided stability for all.</p>



<p>Yet here we are again, nearly 50 years later, facing the same crisis — not just for our fisheries, but for our homes, businesses, and communities. Given the changing economic and environmental conditions of many coastal communities across North Carolina, it could not come at a worse time.</p>



<p>This time, the rollback of wetland protections isn’t coming from local drainage operations. It’s happening due to recent federal and state government actions. The Supreme Court’s Sackett v. EPA decision has dramatically narrowed the definition of federally protected wetlands. The North Carolina General Assembly followed suit, choosing to adopt the weaker federal standard instead of maintaining the stronger state level protections that had been in place for years. And now, under new leadership, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is further diluting the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule, stripping even more protections from wetlands and streams that feed our coastal estuaries.</p>



<p>The consequences? More wetlands drained. More freshwater rushing unchecked into saltwater nurseries. More flooding. More property damage.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Costly gamble</h2>



<p>History has already shown us what happens when we fail to protect our wetlands. In 1976, Rose Bay fisherman Troy W. Mayo spoke out as catches dwindled.</p>



<p>“Twenty-five years ago, I owned a 26-foot shad boat. We used to go out in Rose Bay, two people, for five or six hours and we’d catch 35 to 40 tubs of oysters—that was two men pulling by hand,” said Mayo. “Today you go out in this same area with a power winder and all modern equipment, and I’d be surprised if you catch 10 tubs of oysters.”</p>



<p>Scientists confirmed what fishermen already knew. “Salinity is a major ingredient for survival in the estuaries”; reported the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries. Preston Pate, who studied juvenile shrimp in Rose Bay, found that freshwater intrusion “definitely disrupted the salinity of small creeks in the area. The result was a smaller shrimp harvest by fishermen.”</p>



<p>But wetland loss isn’t just bad for fisheries. Wetlands absorb floodwaters, buffer storm surges, and keep pollution out of our waterways. Every acre lost means more homes and businesses at risk.</p>



<p>In North Carolina, our coastal communities have already been battered by hurricanes, rising insurance costs, rising property taxes, lack of affordable housing, and an aging drainage infrastructure that can’t keep up with heavier rains. Weakening wetland protections only adds fuel to the fire. It shifts costs onto property owners, local governments, and taxpayers — many of whom will be left paying for flood damage that could have been prevented.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Commonsense approach to conservation</h2>



<p>Those lessons from the 1970s helped shape policies that kept North Carolina’s wetlands intact for decades. But now, history is repeating itself. The rollback of WOTUS protections and the state’s decision to weaken its own rules mean more wetlands will be drained, increasing flooding, pollution, and economic losses.</p>



<p>This shouldn’t be a divisive political issue. Wetland protections aren’t just about environmental policy — they’re about practical economics, public safety, and community well-being. They help prevent costly flood damage, safeguard private property, and support the resilience of coastal economies that depend on fisheries, tourism, and clean water.</p>



<p>Jim Brown of the Division of Marine Fisheries put it best nearly 50 years ago:</p>



<p>“We love beans and beef, and we have a serious need to extend agricultural operations. At the same time, we dearly love shrimp and oysters. There exists a very serious need for imposing compatibility between the two. Can it be done? That’s the question. Or do we just keep plodding along with our fingers crossed?”</p>



<p>If we ignore history, we aren’t just crossing our fingers — we are guaranteeing a grim future for our coastal communities. The fishermen of Rose Bay warned us decades ago. Will we listen this time? Or will we, once again, pay the price for failing to protect the wetlands that sustain our way of life?</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p><em>Opinions expressed by the authors are not necessarily those of Coastal Review or our publisher, the <a href="https://www.nccoast.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">North Carolina Coastal Federation</a>. See our <a href="https://www.coastalreview.org/about/submissions/guest-column/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">guidelines</a> for submitting guest columns.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ferry Division adds departures to, from Ocracoke Island</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2025/03/ferry-division-adds-departures-to-from-ocracoke-island/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCDOT Ferry Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ocracoke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coastalreview.org/?p=95975</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="576" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ferry-departs-Ocracoke-terminal-768x576.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Clouds fill the sky as a ferry departs from the Ocracoke terminal on Silver Lake in 2023. Photo: Jennifer Allen" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ferry-departs-Ocracoke-terminal-768x576.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ferry-departs-Ocracoke-terminal-400x300.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ferry-departs-Ocracoke-terminal-200x150.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ferry-departs-Ocracoke-terminal.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />The state Department of Transportation's Ferry Division will increase the number daily transits of Pamlico Sound from four to six starting this week.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="576" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ferry-departs-Ocracoke-terminal-768x576.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Clouds fill the sky as a ferry departs from the Ocracoke terminal on Silver Lake in 2023. Photo: Jennifer Allen" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ferry-departs-Ocracoke-terminal-768x576.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ferry-departs-Ocracoke-terminal-400x300.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ferry-departs-Ocracoke-terminal-200x150.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ferry-departs-Ocracoke-terminal.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /><div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1200" height="900" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ferry-departs-Ocracoke-terminal.jpg" alt="Clouds fill the sky as a ferry departs from the Ocracoke terminal on Silver Lake in 2023. Photo: Jennifer Allen" class="wp-image-95976" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ferry-departs-Ocracoke-terminal.jpg 1200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ferry-departs-Ocracoke-terminal-400x300.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ferry-departs-Ocracoke-terminal-200x150.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ferry-departs-Ocracoke-terminal-768x576.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Clouds fill the sky as a ferry departs from the Ocracoke terminal on Silver Lake in 2023. Photo: Jennifer Allen</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>With the beginning of spring, state transportation officials have added ferry runs between Ocracoke and the mainland terminals at Cedar Island and Swan Quarter.</p>



<p>The North Carolina Department of Transportation Ferry Division will increase the number of daily trips across Pamlico Sound from four to six, beginning this week.</p>



<p>The following is the schedule Tuesday through May 19:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Ocracoke to Cedar Island: 7:30 a.m., 1 p.m. and 4:30 p.m.</li>



<li>Cedar Island to Ocracoke: 7:30 a.m., 10:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.</li>



<li>Ocracoke to Swan Quarter: 7 a.m., 10 a.m. and 1:30 p.m.</li>



<li>Swan Quarter to Ocracoke: 10 a.m., 1:30 p.m., and 4:30 p.m.</li>
</ul>



<p>Reservations for Pamlico Sound ferry routes can be made up to 90 days in advance at <a href="http://link.mediaoutreach.meltwater.com/ls/click?upn=u001.Pmg0-2F9E6PkmaUuDDhbptabqF8fqJgo6bh4e8EqlauqA-3DhOLP_JhWgToIvlhf8IbyXGrG8GqdOM8p-2FyXXCkN7ZqUR2GY7ZY1MypGUQR6UCXbrSWtuSFVOtIEVcLRgqKLosh3Xi54lDZqzXNS1ELXkXWFE4fy1-2BhmUTNp4crDRlfa5lSulBUdMJLxfCIROhFtn9t9jgDN4zg-2B9iE6FEqsqDGxnAgEkcbp8Tchu-2BSrOxsHeKdRFEVjNd4FmAjlr2DA4F7WcYZHhDFTm-2FkWBvO4Lq7NQJG4dXgx95riYnAOc3Tw6jz0iX1si9SP4n8tFTqXONIXJiVUoLJZ8dbNhXGzGlNHLvAgoRmqGXTsBniWNHnYWnXyb2B3UpgEYqWyx26jwqxAQszE5RvvTv0St-2BV4-2FWInOaeq6iIRV57BOHChZbyfXFPK1C" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">ncferry.org</a> or by calling 1-800-BY-FERRY.</p>



<p>For real-time text or email notifications on schedule adjustments and other ferry information, sign up for the Ferry Information Notification System at <a href="http://link.mediaoutreach.meltwater.com/ls/click?upn=u001.Pmg0-2F9E6PkmaUuDDhbptac7KOKMdJlZDrWsLEbjtoQBpe6PIpc-2Fynu9kkVQ-2BMf67toHJ_JhWgToIvlhf8IbyXGrG8GqdOM8p-2FyXXCkN7ZqUR2GY7ZY1MypGUQR6UCXbrSWtuSFVOtIEVcLRgqKLosh3Xi54lDZqzXNS1ELXkXWFE4fy1-2BhmUTNp4crDRlfa5lSulBUdMJLxfCIROhFtn9t9jgDN4zg-2B9iE6FEqsqDGxnAgEkcbp8Tchu-2BSrOxsHeKdRFEVjNd4FmAjlr2DA4F7WcYZNbQsm3rBbPXmBuVrcGQq4iwWPLJ-2FJ6ueBRX9jXj3wKNpula0vyby8u5R6K6G1usKC3jKF2hCaMeEVYVjDPSgUfD4Y1AGD32QAyWmgZh1oYNm-2F84w-2F-2Ff4v77aCfyBKu6-2B0TKtXtOEB8xG4iQt57LqlLkP-2BtufCJzQUDDEs2KYVh1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.ncdot.gov/fins</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mattamuskeet&#8217;s invasive carp boycott carp-removal effort</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2025/03/mattamuskeets-invasive-carp-boycott-carp-removal-effort/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Catherine Kozak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Habitat Restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitat restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyde County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lake Mattamuskeet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Coastal Federation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parks-refuges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife Resources Commission]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coastalreview.org/?p=95663</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="576" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IMG_6796-768x576.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Visitors stroll the boardwalk at the Mattamuskeet National Wildlife Refuge. Photo: Catherine Kozak" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IMG_6796-768x576.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IMG_6796-400x300.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IMG_6796-200x150.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IMG_6796.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />“What we found is we’re not finding the carp numbers in the lake that we thought were there,” Kendall Smith, refuge manager at Mattamuskeet National Wildlife Refuge, told the Lake Mattamuskeet Watershed Restoration Plan Core Stakeholder Team at a recent meeting.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="576" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IMG_6796-768x576.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Visitors stroll the boardwalk at the Mattamuskeet National Wildlife Refuge. Photo: Catherine Kozak" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IMG_6796-768x576.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IMG_6796-400x300.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IMG_6796-200x150.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IMG_6796.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1200" height="900" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IMG_6796.jpg" alt="Visitors stroll the boardwalk at the Mattamuskeet National Wildlife Refuge. Photo: Catherine Kozak" class="wp-image-95661" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IMG_6796.jpg 1200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IMG_6796-400x300.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IMG_6796-200x150.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IMG_6796-768x576.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Visitors stroll the boardwalk at the Mattamuskeet National Wildlife Refuge. Photo: Catherine Kozak</figcaption></figure>



<p>SWAN QUARTER &#8212; Turns out that those million big, invasive fish that were supposed to be swimming in Lake Mattamuskeet didn’t show up, as contractors conducting a mass removal project that began last year reevaluate the estimated population of common carp in the state’s largest natural freshwater lake.</p>



<p>“What we found is we’re not finding the carp numbers in the lake that we thought were there,” Kendall Smith, refuge manager at Mattamuskeet National Wildlife Refuge, told the Lake Mattamuskeet Watershed Restoration Plan Core Stakeholder Team at a recent meeting.</p>



<p>“So far we have not detected any aggregations of fish. We are finding concentration, places where you find more fish than others, but nothing that would be considered an aggregation,” he said.</p>



<p>Smith explained that the refuge will continue to work with the contractor during the year to review other techniques, assess the issues with the carp’s habits and reproduction, and determine the next approach.</p>



<p>“We’re learning a lot about their movements, confirming whether or not they do activate in the wintertime or early spring,” Smith continued.</p>



<p>But reduction of carp, aggressive bottom feeders that are blamed for much of the lake’s turbidity, is just one of the multiple challenges being tackled. The team, made up of folks with local, state and federal expertise, including representatives from governments, nonprofits and landowners, is proving to be as resilient and adaptive as the lake itself.</p>



<p>“Like anything worthwhile, it’s the hard stuff you’ve got to pay attention to,” local farmer and former refuge biologist Kelly Davis told Coastal Review, “because the easy stuff works itself out, right?”</p>



<p>A member of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, Davis, along with her late husband Blythe, for decades farmed 2,000 acres of farmland in Hyde County, of which about 150 acres drain into Lake Mattamuskeet.</p>



<p>In her observation, the lake’s biggest issue in restoring the submerged aquatic vegetation, or SAV, is the haziness of the water, to which the carp contribute by churning up the lake bottom.</p>



<p>“Whatever&#8217;s killing the grass,’ she said, “it&#8217;s sedimentation. It’s cloudy waters.”</p>



<p>&nbsp;Often referred to as a jewel of Hyde County, Lake Mattamuskeet, the centerpiece of the refuge, is 6 miles wide, 18 miles long and averages 2 feet deep.</p>



<p>The 40,000-acre lake, expansive and often shimmering, is famously photogenic. Serene cypress swamps along its border could be described convincingly as habitat for elves and gnomes.</p>



<p>But its beauty belies its environmental vulnerability. It is situated on low land, surrounded by pocosin forests and rich farmlands, intersected by gated canals that drain water, sediment and nutrients into the lake.</p>



<p>In addition to nearby rivers, the vast Pamlico Sound, to the lake ecosystem’s benefit and detriment, contributes some of its marine life and waters, whether pushed in by wind-driven tides or flooding.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Since the 1990s, the submerged aquatic vegetation in the lake had gradually then suddenly disappeared, depriving the hundreds of thousands of waterfowl along the Atlantic Flyway that had stopped over for food and shelter.</p>



<p>Once Hyde County’s community hub, the lake, the refuge and the long-closed Mattamuskeet Lodge, which the county plans to restore and reopen, is still supporting hunting, fishing and farming activities. And ducks, swans and geese still alight at Mattamuskeet, but now mostly at the seasonal duck impoundments created around the lake.</p>



<p>Since 2017, the stakeholder team has been focused on solutions to the lake’s water quality problems, including loss of SAV and persistent algal blooms, as well as flooding and drainage of the surrounding land.</p>



<p>Guidance for the work has been provided by a <a href="https://www.nccoast.org/project/lake-mattamuskeet-watershed-restoration/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">watershed restoration plan</a> facilitated by the North Carolina Coastal Federation, in partnership with Hyde County, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. The Coastal Federation is the publisher of Coastal Review, an independent online newspaper that covers coastal issues in North Carolina.</p>



<p>Despite uncertainty with staffing and funding concerns related to recent cuts in the federal government, work at the lake and surrounding land is ongoing and planned for upcoming months, according to a discussion during the Jan. 30 team meeting in the Hyde County Government Complex.</p>



<p>Five projects, funded by a $16.86 million Regional Conservation Partnership Program grant awarded to the North Carolina Coastal Federation, are designed to enhance water quality within the Lake Mattamuskeet watershed.</p>



<p>Project planned are improvements in the Fairfield Drainage District including installing a pump station to reduce drainage into the lake and enhance crops, restoring 1,000 acres of wetlands on converted agricultural land, constructing a 4,506-linear foot living shoreline to protect a Natural Resources Conservation Service dike in Swan Quarter and other critical infrastructure, facilitating agricultural best management practices to mitigate discharge of agricultural runoff into the lake, and outreach to aquaculture producers in an effort to boost participation in oyster restoration.</p>



<p>The Coastal Federation is currently working to finalize a partnership agreement with the Conservation Service, according to the federation’s coastal advocate Alyson Flynn, the meeting’s moderator. She also said that the federation has contracted with consultant Jonathan Hinkle to assist in the design and modeling of the large-scale restoration projects.</p>



<p>Part of the work, which has a four-year timeline, with a potential 1-year extension, involves diverting, pumping and draining water on the land in a way that would avoid adding sediment or nutrients to the lake, a hydrology challenge to engineer and a problem when there may be divergent goals. Drainage improvements also include cleaning out major drainage canals.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="926" height="1280" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Cypress-Swamp-vert-926x1280.jpg" alt="Dappled sunlight illuminates cypresses standing in Cypress Swamp in the Mattamuskeet National Wildlife Refuge in December. Photo: Catherine Kozak" class="wp-image-95662" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Cypress-Swamp-vert-926x1280.jpg 926w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Cypress-Swamp-vert-289x400.jpg 289w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Cypress-Swamp-vert-145x200.jpg 145w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Cypress-Swamp-vert-768x1062.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Cypress-Swamp-vert-1111x1536.jpg 1111w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Cypress-Swamp-vert.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 926px) 100vw, 926px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Dappled sunlight illuminates cypresses standing in Cypress Swamp in the Mattamuskeet National Wildlife Refuge in December. Photo: Catherine Kozak</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p> “We all agree that the lake is in poor health, and we want to help fix it, but what that looks like seem to change,” Flynn said in an interview, referring to the proposed Fairfield project. “And so, yes, by diverting that fresh water up into the north, we&#8217;re hoping that the lake water will naturally filter out through that designed wetland before it gets to the Intracoastal Waterway in the north, with the assistance of pumps.”</p>



<p>Davis, who attended the stakeholders meeting informally as an area landowner, said that water is affected by changes in sea level and by wind tide, and there’s no choice but to work with the conditions, whatever their whims.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>



<p>“There will be times where some of that water movement is hampered until the wind shifts and blows the sound back out, but that&#8217;s part of water management in Hyde County, or really on the peninsula,” Davis said. “Whether the water body is the Pungo River, the Intracoastal Waterway, the Pamlico Sound, or Lake Mattamuskeet, the whole idea is to try to get the sediment trapped somewhere before it hits that water. And as the water slowly move through wetlands, the slower you can move the water, the more time it has for the sediment to fall out, and the more what you&#8217;re sending to the water bodies is mostly just water.”</p>



<p>What is important, she added, is that all the projects’ stakeholders are engaged and involved — and patient.</p>



<p>“They&#8217;re big projects, but they&#8217;re also projects that should have decades of value. The projects don&#8217;t have to be perfect,” she said, adding that every challenge that is addressed at the time makes a difference. “Because the needs are now, and they will be in the near term and the long term, and the wind still blows the sound out.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pamlico Sound ferries begin offering 3 round trips daily</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2024/04/pamlico-sound-ferries-begin-offering-3-round-trips-daily/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 18:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCDOT Ferry Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outer Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coastalreview.org/?p=87256</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="575" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/leaving-ocracoke-terminal-to-cedar-island-768x575.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Departing Ocracoke terminal by ferry during a recent cloudy weekend. Photo: Jennifer Allen" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/leaving-ocracoke-terminal-to-cedar-island-768x575.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/leaving-ocracoke-terminal-to-cedar-island-400x300.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/leaving-ocracoke-terminal-to-cedar-island-200x150.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/leaving-ocracoke-terminal-to-cedar-island.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />The additional runs were added Tuesday for the Cedar Island-Ocracoke and Swan Quarter-Ocracoke routes.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="575" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/leaving-ocracoke-terminal-to-cedar-island-768x575.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Departing Ocracoke terminal by ferry during a recent cloudy weekend. Photo: Jennifer Allen" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/leaving-ocracoke-terminal-to-cedar-island-768x575.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/leaving-ocracoke-terminal-to-cedar-island-400x300.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/leaving-ocracoke-terminal-to-cedar-island-200x150.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/leaving-ocracoke-terminal-to-cedar-island.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /><div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1200" height="899" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/leaving-ocracoke-terminal-to-cedar-island.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-79675" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/leaving-ocracoke-terminal-to-cedar-island.jpg 1200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/leaving-ocracoke-terminal-to-cedar-island-400x300.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/leaving-ocracoke-terminal-to-cedar-island-200x150.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/leaving-ocracoke-terminal-to-cedar-island-768x575.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Departing Ocracoke terminal by ferry during a recent cloudy weekend. Photo: Jennifer Allen</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>Transportation officials are adding more round trips to the Cedar Island-Ocracoke and Swan Quarter-Ocracoke ferry schedules. &nbsp;</p>



<p>The North Carolina Department of Transportation announced Monday that the schedule will be the following starting Tuesday:   </p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Cedar Island to Ocracoke:</strong>&nbsp;7:30 a.m., 10:30 a.m., 4:30 p.m.</li>



<li><strong>Ocracoke to Cedar Island:&nbsp;</strong>7:30 a.m., 1 p.m., 4:30 p.m.</li>



<li><strong>Swan Quarter to Ocracoke:</strong>&nbsp;10 a.m., 1:30 p.m., 4:30 p.m.</li>



<li><strong>Ocracoke to Swan Quarter:</strong>&nbsp;7 a.m., 10 a.m., 1:30 p.m.</li>
</ul>



<p>The schedule for all of the North Carolina state ferries can be found&nbsp;on the <a href="https://www.ncdot.gov/travel-maps/ferry-tickets-services/Pages/default.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NCDOT website</a>.</p>



<p>Officials recommend making reservations during the spring. Travelers can make <a href="https://www.ncdot.gov/travel-maps/ferry-tickets-services/Pages/default.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">reservations online</a> or on the phone at 1-800-BY-FERRY. &nbsp;</p>



<p>For real-time text or email updates on weather or mechanical delays, sign up for the Ferry Information Notification System at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ncdot.gov/travel-maps/ferry-tickets-services/Pages/ferry-information-notification-system.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.ncdot.gov/fins</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Last Days of the East Dismal Swamp</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2023/11/the-last-days-of-the-east-dismal-swamp/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Cecelski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture & History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture and history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Dismal Swamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coastalreview.org/?p=83293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="561" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/log-train-768x561.webp" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Log train on the Norfolk &amp; Southern’s Main Line bound for the John H. Roper Lumber Co.’s mill in Belhaven, N.C., ca. 1907. The trees, apparently from old-growth groves 8 miles north of Belhaven, are poplar, pine, and tupelo (black) gum. American Lumberman, April 27, 1907." style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/log-train-768x561.webp 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/log-train-400x292.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/log-train-200x146.webp 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/log-train.webp 1014w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />Historian David Cecelski created what he called an online history exhibit featuring 40 images illustrating the last decades of an ancient swamp forest that was once located on the North Carolina coast.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="561" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/log-train-768x561.webp" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Log train on the Norfolk &amp; Southern’s Main Line bound for the John H. Roper Lumber Co.’s mill in Belhaven, N.C., ca. 1907. The trees, apparently from old-growth groves 8 miles north of Belhaven, are poplar, pine, and tupelo (black) gum. American Lumberman, April 27, 1907." style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/log-train-768x561.webp 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/log-train-400x292.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/log-train-200x146.webp 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/log-train.webp 1014w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /><div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="543" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/A-logging-crew-in-the-East-Dismal-Swamp-historically-one-of-the-largest-freshwater-wetlands-on-the-North-Carolina-coast.webp" alt="A logging crew in the East Dismal Swamp, historically one of the largest freshwater wetlands on the North Carolina coast, ca. 1910-12. Source: Surry Parker, Steam Logging Machinery (Pine Town, N.C., 1912). Copy, North Carolina Collection, UNC-Chapel Hill

" class="wp-image-83294" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/A-logging-crew-in-the-East-Dismal-Swamp-historically-one-of-the-largest-freshwater-wetlands-on-the-North-Carolina-coast.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/A-logging-crew-in-the-East-Dismal-Swamp-historically-one-of-the-largest-freshwater-wetlands-on-the-North-Carolina-coast-400x321.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/A-logging-crew-in-the-East-Dismal-Swamp-historically-one-of-the-largest-freshwater-wetlands-on-the-North-Carolina-coast-200x161.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A logging crew in the East Dismal Swamp, historically one of the largest freshwater wetlands on the North Carolina coast, ca. 1910-12. Source: Surry Parker, Steam Logging Machinery (Pine Town, N.C., 1912). Copy, North Carolina Collection, UNC-Chapel Hill

</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p><em>Coastal Review features the work of North Carolina historian David Cecelski, who writes about the history, culture and politics of the North Carolina coast.</em></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">***</p>



<p class="has-text-align-left"><em>Note from the author: I have written this as kind of an online history exhibit. The story starts with a short introduction, then features more than 40 annotated photographs and other images illustrating the last decades of an ancient swamp forest that was once located on the North Carolina coast.&nbsp;</em></p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">***</p>



<p>For quite some time, I have been collecting historical&nbsp;photographs, maps, and manuscripts that document the lumber boomtowns and logging camps of the Pungo River and its hinterlands in the late 19th century and the early part of the 20th century.</p>



<p>After the Civil War, lumber companies bought thousands of square miles of forestlands on the North Carolina coast. As if out of nowhere, scores of lumber mill towns sprang up virtually overnight (only to vanish, most of them, when the forest was gone).</p>



<p>The lumber companies reshaped the land, our most important towns, and even some of our most remote islands.</p>



<p>Logging camps seemed to be everywhere. Hundreds, maybe thousands, of miles of railroads were built to move logging machinery into even the most remote swamp forests, to haul logs to mills, and to carry lumber after it was milled to northern seaports.</p>



<p>Canals were built to drain swamp forests. Lumber barges and schooners crowded local waterways.</p>



<p>For the sake of building America, coastal forests that had stood for centuries, and sometimes millennia, vanished.</p>



<p>I do not know to what I can compare that part of North Carolina’s coastal history. It was a frontier world, often almost lawless, dangerous, destructive, and, for some, liberating, all at once.</p>



<p>Thousands of people left farms and fishing boats and their old lives to make a go of it in the mills and logwoods.</p>



<p>And they came from all over, not just from local towns and villages, but Appalachian hollows, Great Lakes logging camps, and New York City tenement houses.</p>



<p>They included men and women with the scars of slavery still on their backs, Outer Banks fishing families, and immigrants fresh from Ellis Island, many of them speaking barely a word of English &#8212; all made their way to the lumber mill towns and logging camps.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="600" height="663" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/lake-matt.jpg" alt="This 1808 map shows what is still the largest freshwater wetlands complex on the North Carolina coast. The dotted territory is swamplands, mostly pocosins, but also Includes river bottomlands, cypress and gum swamps, and other wetlands. We can see the Pungo River on the western side of Hyde County. We can also see the Pungo’s place within the larger, even more vast territory of freshwater wetlands that make up the Albemarle-Pamlico peninsula.  Pocosins— an Algonquin word– are a unique kind of raised peat bog and make up the majority of five counties on that part of the North Carolina coast: Beaufort, Washington, Hyde, Tyrrell, and Dare. Taken together, they make up what Dr. John Paul Lilly, professor emeritus of soil science at N. C. State, has called “the largest pocosin in the world.” Jonathan Price et. al., This first actual survey of the state of North Carolina taken by the subscribers is respectfully dedicated…. (Philadelphia: C.P. Harrison, 1808). Courtesy, Library of Congress

" class="wp-image-83295" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/lake-matt.jpg 600w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/lake-matt-362x400.jpg 362w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/lake-matt-181x200.jpg 181w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">This 1808 map shows what is still the largest freshwater wetlands complex on the North Carolina coast. The dotted territory is swamplands, mostly pocosins, but also Includes river bottomlands, cypress and gum swamps, and other wetlands. We can see the Pungo River on the western side of Hyde County. We can also see the Pungo’s place within the larger, even more vast territory of freshwater wetlands that make up the Albemarle-Pamlico peninsula.  Pocosins— an Algonquin word– are a unique kind of raised peat bog and make up the majority of five counties on that part of the North Carolina coast: Beaufort, Washington, Hyde, Tyrrell, and Dare. Taken together, they make up what Dr. John Paul Lilly, professor emeritus of soil science at N. C. State, has called “the largest pocosin in the world.” Jonathan Price et. al., This first actual survey of the state of North Carolina taken by the subscribers is respectfully dedicated…. (Philadelphia: C.P. Harrison, 1808). Courtesy, Library of Congress

</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>In this collection of historical images today, I am focusing on the lumber boom in just one corner of the North Carolina coast, the Pungo and the forests within about 15 miles of its shores.</p>



<p>But I hope that by so doing, we can at least get a glimpse of the size and scale of the lumber boom throughout the North Carolina coast, what it was like for the people who lived through it, and how it transformed our communities, as well as our land and waters.</p>



<p>Rising in the central part of Washington County, in the remnants of what local people today often call the “Big Swamp,” the&nbsp;Pungo, an Algonquin Indian word, is only 35 miles long.</p>



<p>In its northernmost reaches, the river flows today through a canal that was dug in the 1950s to drain the farmlands west of Pungo Lake and what is now the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fws.gov/refuge/pocosin-lakes" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge</a>.</p>



<p>But then the river grows wild again. It meanders south, passing along breathtakingly beautiful cane brakes and marshlands until it opens up into a broad bay, an estuary really, that eventually folds itself into the Pamlico River and the Pamlico Sound.</p>



<p>Today it is a quiet, peaceful place. Belhaven, the only town on the river, has a population of less than 1,500. Pantego (another Algonquin name), the only town on any of the river’s tributaries, has maybe a few more than 200 residents.</p>



<p>It is a place of rural byways and little crossroads: when you leave Belhaven, you can go 25 miles in any direction &#8212; east, west, north, or south &#8212; and never hit a stoplight.</p>



<p>But as you will see here, the Pungo was once a very different place.</p>



<p>As you look through these old photographs and yellowed maps, please know that I am, as people sometimes say, a “lifetime learner.” I would always welcome hearing from anyone who might know more about any of these images.</p>



<p>In studying the Pungo’s lumber boom, one thing is very clear to me though: whatever other stories I tell, anything I write will also be an elegy. It just has to be.</p>



<p>The Pungo River was once the heart of one of America’s great natural wonders. When you left the river’s shores, you entered a vast wilderness, a swamp forest that covered hundreds of square miles and was so large and so foreboding that it had long been a refuge for the local Algonquin people, fugitive slaves, and other outcasts.</p>



<p>For those who care about our natural heritage, it was a marvel: the East Dismal Swamp, as I am going to call it, &nbsp;was home to&nbsp;ancient and majestic groves of bald cypress, some of the country’s largest stands of Atlantic white cedar (juniper), and&nbsp;pocosin wetlands&nbsp;of a size and grandeur found in few other places on Earth.</p>



<p>But especially between 1880 and 1920, the logging companies and land developers did not just log the Pungo’s old-growth forests: they erased them.</p>



<p>Using railroads and new kinds of machinery, they logged even the most remote corners of the East Dismal. Then, especially in the pocosins, they dug great canals and vast networks of ditches to drain the land. When the peat soils dried out, they then burned what was left of the forest and the peat beds again and again.</p>



<p>They did that until the East Dismal Swamp &#8212; or whatever you want to call that great swamp wilderness &#8212; was gone.</p>



<p>If you visit the site of the East Dismal today, you will find only a broad, open plain and seeming endless farm fields, stretching, in many places almost treeless, as far as the eye can see.</p>



<p>You might think that you were in Kansas or Nebraska, if it were not for the miles and miles of canals and ditches.</p>



<p>History is for me, when all is said and done, about remembrance and recalling the ancestors.</p>



<p>And through them, coming to know ourselves.</p>



<p>But there are also times when I think that we should remember lost places, out of respect for them and maybe for our own good, too. I think that this is one of those times.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-center">-1-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="855" height="779" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/a_map_of_the_albemarle_swamp_land_companys_lands_that_part_of_the_lands_claimed_by_the_state_lying_near_lake_pungo_and_pungo_river_by_washington_w_hayman_may_1844-e1697588506204.jpg" alt="This survey is the earliest detailed map of the East Dismal Swamp that I have seen. Dated 1844, it shows the holdings of the Albemarle Swamp Land Company, a Virginia lumber company that had purchased approximately 100,000 acres of the East Dismal in 1840. The company had bought the land from the heirs of Josiah Collins (1735-1819), a wealthy planter who operated what amounted to a massive slave labor camp at Lake Phelps, 10 miles east of the Pungo River. At that site, Collins forced hundreds of Africans and their children and grandchildren to hew an agricultural plantation out of a vast pocosin swamp. Southern agricultural leaders widely considered his plantation at Lake Phelps to be a pioneering model for turning pocosin swamplands into agricultural fields. A central lesson of his experience, however, was that, at least at that time, it could only be done with large numbers of slave laborers and at the cost of an enormous amount of human suffering. On this map, we can see two major infrastructure projects that enslaved Africans and their descendants were forced to build in the vicinity of the Pungo River: the Pungo Canal, which runs out of Pungo Lake a distance of 6 and 1/2 miles to the Pungo River, and the Plymouth &amp; Pungo Turnpike (in the map’s top left corner). Both projects helped to open up the East Dismal to logging after the Civil War. Source: Washington W. Hayman, “A Map of the Albemarle Swamp Land Company’s Lands… near Lake Pungo and Pungo River” (1844). Courtesy, State Archives of North Carolina

" class="wp-image-83296" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/a_map_of_the_albemarle_swamp_land_companys_lands_that_part_of_the_lands_claimed_by_the_state_lying_near_lake_pungo_and_pungo_river_by_washington_w_hayman_may_1844-e1697588506204.jpg 855w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/a_map_of_the_albemarle_swamp_land_companys_lands_that_part_of_the_lands_claimed_by_the_state_lying_near_lake_pungo_and_pungo_river_by_washington_w_hayman_may_1844-e1697588506204-400x364.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/a_map_of_the_albemarle_swamp_land_companys_lands_that_part_of_the_lands_claimed_by_the_state_lying_near_lake_pungo_and_pungo_river_by_washington_w_hayman_may_1844-e1697588506204-200x182.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/a_map_of_the_albemarle_swamp_land_companys_lands_that_part_of_the_lands_claimed_by_the_state_lying_near_lake_pungo_and_pungo_river_by_washington_w_hayman_may_1844-e1697588506204-768x700.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 855px) 100vw, 855px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">This survey is the earliest detailed map of the East Dismal Swamp that I have seen. Dated 1844, it shows the holdings of the Albemarle Swamp Land Co., a Virginia lumber company that had purchased approximately 100,000 acres of the East Dismal in 1840. The company had bought the land from the heirs of <a href="https://www.ncpedia.org/biography/collins-josiah-sr" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Josiah Collins</a> (1735-1819), a wealthy planter who operated what amounted to a massive slave labor camp at Lake Phelps, 10 miles east of the Pungo River. At that site, Collins forced hundreds of Africans and their children and grandchildren to hew an agricultural plantation out of a vast pocosin swamp. Southern agricultural leaders widely considered his plantation at Lake Phelps to be a pioneering model for turning pocosin swamplands into agricultural fields. A central lesson of his experience, however, was that, at least at that time, it could only be done with large numbers of slave laborers and at the cost of an enormous amount of human suffering. On this map, we can see two major infrastructure projects that enslaved Africans and their descendants were forced to build in the vicinity of the Pungo River: the Pungo Canal, which runs out of Pungo Lake a distance of 6.5 miles to the Pungo River, and the Plymouth &amp; Pungo Turnpike (in the map’s top left corner). Both projects helped to open up the East Dismal to logging after the Civil War. Source: Washington W. Hayman, <a href="https://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/ncmaps/id/4386/rec/3" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">“A Map of the Albemarle Swamp Land Company’s Lands… near Lake Pungo and Pungo River”</a> (1844). Courtesy, State Archives of North Carolina </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-2-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="483" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/tyrrell-map.webp" alt="Map of the Albemarle &amp; Pantego Railroad (G. W. and C. B. Colton &amp; Co.), 1887. Courtesy, Library of Congress. The shaded portion of the map shows the approx. 140,000 acres of the East Dismal Swamp that the John L. Roper Lumber Co. first leased and later acquired from the Albemarle Swamp Land Company ca. 1880. Prior to the Civil War, an unknown but not insignificant part of that swamp forest had been selectively logged at least once (largely by enslaved laborers). Once in possession of the land, the Roper Lumber Co. built the Albemarle &amp; Pantego Railroad to serve as the backbone for its far more extensive logging operations on that part of the N.C. coast. The Norfolk &amp; Southern Railroad– of which John L. Roper was a principal investor and officer– purchased the railroad and expanded the line from Mackey’s Ferry to Belhaven ca. 1891.

" class="wp-image-83297" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/tyrrell-map.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/tyrrell-map-400x286.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/tyrrell-map-200x143.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><a href="https://www.loc.gov/resource/g3901p.rr003170/?r=-0.406,0.416,1.283,0.624,0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Map of the Albemarle &amp; Pantego Railroad</a> (G. W. and C. B. Colton &amp; Co.), 1887. Courtesy, Library of Congress. The shaded portion of the map shows the approx. 140,000 acres of the East Dismal Swamp that the John L. Roper Lumber Co. first leased and later acquired from the Albemarle Swamp Land Company ca. 1880. Prior to the Civil War, an unknown but not insignificant part of that swamp forest had been selectively logged at least once (largely by enslaved laborers). Once in possession of the land, the Roper Lumber Co. built the Albemarle &amp; Pantego Railroad to serve as the backbone for its far more extensive logging operations on that part of the N.C. coast. The Norfolk &amp; Southern Railroad, for which John L. Roper was a principal investor and officer, purchased the railroad and expanded the line from Mackey’s Ferry to Belhaven 1891. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-3-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="901" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/woods.webp" alt="This is logging railroad built through an Atlantic white cedar swamp forest 8-10 miles northeast of the Pungo River’s headwaters, ca. 1900-1907. The railroad carried logs to the John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s cedar mill in Roper, in Washington County, N.C. The abundance of Atlantic white cedar (Chaemaecyparis thyoids), also known as juniper, was one of the most compelling reasons that the John L. Roper Lumber Co. purchased more than 100,000 acres in the East Dismal Swamp ca. 1880. Atlantic white cedar are evergreen coniferous trees native to peaty swamps and bogs in a narrow coastal belt running from southern Maine to Mississippi. No tree was more valued by lumber companies on the North Carolina coast. Because it is lightweight, resistant to water decay, and straight grained, the wood of Atlantic white cedars has historically been used for making shingles, shakes, posts, and other building materials, as well as for the construction of tubs, pails and other woodenware. It was also the preferring wood for North Carolina’s boat builders, and remains so today. Because of the wood’s desirability and the high prices it brought, lumber companies targeted Atlantic white cedar forests with special vigor. Photo from American Lumberman, 27 April 1907.

" class="wp-image-83298" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/woods.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/woods-300x400.webp 300w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/woods-150x200.webp 150w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">This is logging railroad built through an Atlantic white cedar swamp forest 8-10 miles northeast of the Pungo River’s headwaters, 1900-1907. The railroad carried logs to the John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s cedar mill in Roper, in Washington County. The abundance of Atlantic white cedar (Chaemaecyparis thyoids), also known as juniper, was one of the most compelling reasons that the John L. Roper Lumber Co. purchased more than 100,000 acres in the East Dismal Swamp around 1880. Atlantic white cedar are evergreen coniferous trees native to peaty swamps and bogs in a narrow coastal belt running from southern Maine to Mississippi. No tree was more valued by lumber companies on the North Carolina coast. Because it is lightweight, resistant to water decay, and straight grained, the wood of Atlantic white cedars has historically been used for making shingles, shakes, posts, and other building materials, as well as for the construction of tubs, pails and other woodenware. It was also the preferring wood for North Carolina’s boat builders, and remains so today. Because of the wood’s desirability and the high prices it brought, lumber companies targeted Atlantic white cedar forests with special vigor. Photo from American Lumberman, April 27, 1907. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-4-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full is-resized"><img decoding="async" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/wonderland-2-e1689007664545.jpg" alt="This is a remote labor camp called Wonderland, on the border of Washington County and Beaufort County, N.C., November 1917. The railroad tracks are those of the Norfolk &amp; Southern. On the left, we can see a commissary and post office being built. On the right, we can see barracks for some of the hundreds of black workers that were employed in logging, clearing, and burning and re-burning what was left of the East Dismal Swamp. After logging the swamp forest, the Roper Lumber Co. had sold 40,000 acres of its holdings in the East Dismal to Mark W. Potter, a wealthy New York attorney who was president of the Ohio, Clinchfield &amp; Carolina Railway Co. (a subsidiary of the Norfolk and Southern). Going into business with local lumbermen and land developers John A. and Samuel Wilkinson (more on them later), Potter aimed to reclaim the logged swamplands, subdivide the land, and sell plots to farmers recruited mainly in the Midwestern states. However, according to federal records, Wonderland only had a post office from 1917 to 1925. Once the ground was made ready for farming, the little settlement disappeared and was soon forgotten. Other land developers attempted similar projects on the Roper Lumber Co.’s former holdings. According to a WPA interview with Samuel Wilkinson in 1938, most, including the Wilkinson brothers, ended up making little if any profit, in large part due to the ongoing costs of draining the land. By the time that they added up their losses however, only a scattered few thousand acres of the East Dismal had not been logged, drained, burned repeatedly, and turned into farmland. From Views of Potter Farms Development: Showing Various Stages in the Evolution of Potter Farms (1917),  North Carolina Collection, Wilson Library, UNC-Chapel Hill

" class="wp-image-83299" width="600" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/wonderland-2-e1689007664545.jpg 408w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/wonderland-2-e1689007664545-400x236.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/wonderland-2-e1689007664545-200x118.jpg 200w" sizes="(max-width: 408px) 100vw, 408px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">This is a remote labor camp called Wonderland, on the border of Washington and Beaufort counties November 1917. The railroad tracks are those of the Norfolk &amp; Southern. On the left, we can see a commissary and post office being built. On the right, we can see barracks for some of the hundreds of Black workers that were employed in logging, clearing, and burning and reburning what was left of the East Dismal Swamp. After logging the swamp forest, the Roper Lumber Co. had sold 40,000 acres of its holdings in the East Dismal to Mark W. Potter, a wealthy New York attorney who was president of the Ohio, Clinchfield &amp; Carolina Railway Co. (a subsidiary of the Norfolk and Southern). Going into business with local lumbermen and land developers John A. and Samuel Wilkinson (more on them later), Potter aimed to reclaim the logged swamplands, subdivide the land, and sell plots to farmers recruited mainly in the Midwestern states. However, according to federal records, Wonderland only had a post office from 1917 to 1925. Once the ground was made ready for farming, the little settlement disappeared and was soon forgotten. Other land developers attempted similar projects on the Roper Lumber Co.’s former holdings. According to a <a href="https://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/search/collection/03709/searchterm/folder_803!03709/field/contri!escri/mode/exact!exact/conn/and!and/order/relatid/ad/asc/cosuppress/0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">WPA interview</a> with Samuel Wilkinson in 1938, most, including the Wilkinson brothers, ended up making little, if any, profit, in large part due to the ongoing costs of draining the land. By the time that they added up their losses however, only a scattered few thousand acres of the East Dismal had not been logged, drained, burned repeatedly, and turned into farmland. From Views of Potter Farms Development: Showing Various Stages in the Evolution of Potter Farms (1917),  North Carolina Collection, Wilson Library, UNC-Chapel Hill </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-5-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="507" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/machine.webp" alt="In 1913, Samuel Wilmer, a correspondent for the Manufacturers Record in Baltimore, visited one of John A. and Samuel Wilkinson’s drainage projects in the East Dismal Swamp. The Wilkinson brothers had bought a 20 or 25,000-acre tract of heavily logged swampland from the Roper Lumber Co. to convert it into farmland for their own profit. Wilmer wrote: “Back in the woods . . . is a big steam dredge built by the American Steam Dredge Co., Fort Wayne, Ind., working night and day…. It is operated by two crews, one of whom sleeps in a houseboat attached while the other works.” The Wilkinsons’ two dredges dug many miles of canals through the section of the East Dismal northwest of Pantego (in the area that became the community of Terra Ceia) and also along the main line of the Norfolk &amp; Southern, on and around the border of Hyde and Washington counties. Their dredging crews dug the main canals 20 feet across and 8 feet deep and located them a mile apart. Since that time, the drainage of those freshwater wetlands into the Pungo River watershed has had a profound effect on water quality in the Pamlico Sound and on the estuary’s commercial fisheries.  Photo from Samuel G. Wilmer, “New Railroad and Drainage Work,” Manufacturers Record (Baltimore, Md.), 1 Jan. 1914

" class="wp-image-83300" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/machine.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/machine-400x300.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/machine-200x150.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">In 1913, Samuel Wilmer, a correspondent for the Manufacturers Record in Baltimore, visited one of John A. and Samuel Wilkinson’s drainage projects in the East Dismal Swamp. The Wilkinson brothers had bought a 20 or 25,000-acre tract of heavily logged swampland from the Roper Lumber Co. to convert it into farmland for their own profit. Wilmer wrote: “Back in the woods . . . is a big steam dredge built by the American Steam Dredge Co., Fort Wayne, Ind., working night and day…. It is operated by two crews, one of whom sleeps in a houseboat attached while the other works.” The Wilkinsons’ two dredges dug many miles of canals through the section of the East Dismal northwest of Pantego (in the area that became the community of Terra Ceia) and also along the main line of the Norfolk &amp; Southern, on and around the border of Hyde and Washington counties. Their dredging crews dug the main canals 20 feet across and 8 feet deep and located them a mile apart. Since that time, the drainage of those freshwater wetlands into the Pungo River watershed has had a profound effect on water quality in the Pamlico Sound and on the estuary’s commercial fisheries.  Photo from Samuel G. Wilmer, “New Railroad and Drainage Work,” Manufacturers Record (Baltimore, Md.), 1 Jan. 1914

</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-6-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="494" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/dredge.webp" alt="This is a somewhat later view of one of the Wilkinson brothers’ dredges at work in the swamp forests near the Pungo River, ca. 1918. In an interview 20 years later, when he was almost 80, Samuel Wilkinson described the birth of Terra Ceia, a farming settlement built on the the remains of an old growth swamp forest northwest of Pantego. He told the interviewer, Muriel Wolff: “When I was a boy all that land over there wasn’t anything but swamp. It was full of great big cypress and juniper trees, timber that never had been cut. Well, back in 1905 I was working for the Roper Lumber Company, located over in Belhaven, and they started logging that swamp. To do that they had to dig ditches and drain off some of the water, but it still wasn’t fit for anything when me and my brother bought up 20,000 acres in 1911…. If you don’t believe we spent the money, I’ll tell you what we had to do. That was swamp land, remember, and ditches wouldn’t drain off all the water. There had to be 40 miles of canals besides the ditches. We paid $20,000 for a dredge to dig canals. It broke after the first seven miles. We bought another but it broke too before we finished. Then we had to put through a branch line of the railroad—11 miles of it at $1,000 a mile. Before we could lay a track we had to buy the right of way and buy $70,000 worth of Norfolk &amp; Southern stock. But we got the railroad through.” Ms. Wolff’s interview can be found in the Federal Writers’ Project Papers at the Southern Historical Collection at UNC-Chapel Hill. Photo source: Cut-Over Lands vol. 1, #4 (July 1918).

" class="wp-image-83301" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/dredge.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/dredge-400x292.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/dredge-200x146.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">This is a somewhat later view of one of the Wilkinson brothers’ dredges at work in the swamp forests near the Pungo River around 1918. In an interview 20 years later, when he was almost 80, Samuel Wilkinson described the birth of Terra Ceia, a farming settlement built on the the remains of an old growth swamp forest northwest of Pantego. He told the interviewer, Muriel Wolff: “When I was a boy all that land over there wasn’t anything but swamp. It was full of great big cypress and juniper trees, timber that never had been cut. Well, back in 1905 I was working for the Roper Lumber Company, located over in Belhaven, and they started logging that swamp. To do that they had to dig ditches and drain off some of the water, but it still wasn’t fit for anything when me and my brother bought up 20,000 acres in 1911…. If you don’t believe we spent the money, I’ll tell you what we had to do. That was swamp land, remember, and ditches wouldn’t drain off all the water. There had to be 40 miles of canals besides the ditches. We paid $20,000 for a dredge to dig canals. It broke after the first seven miles. We bought another but it broke too before we finished. Then we had to put through a branch line of the railroad—11 miles of it at $1,000 a mile. Before we could lay a track we had to buy the right of way and buy $70,000 worth of Norfolk &amp; Southern stock. But we got the railroad through.” Ms. Wolff’s interview can be found in the <a href="https://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/03709/id/1046/rec/1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Federal Writers’ Project Papers</a> at the Southern Historical Collection at UNC-Chapel Hill. Photo source: <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=pGfmAAAAMAAJ&amp;pg=RA3-PA14&amp;lpg=RA3-PA14&amp;dq=%22stuck+corn%22+belhaven&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=p1kUHfNSXn&amp;sig=ACfU3U1TzhDAq_Xt479mLuvoYUp4SOT57A&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=2ahUKEwiIj-OYxZyCAxXIk2oFHbsqAVIQ6AF6BAgJEAM#v=onepage&amp;q=%22stuck%20corn%22%20belhaven&amp;f=false" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Cut-Over Lands vol. 1, #4 (July 1918</a>). </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-7-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/swamp-forest.webp" alt="According to the Raleigh News &amp; Observer (28 August 1910), the process that John A. and Samuel Wilkinson used to turn old-growth swamp forests into farmland had been used on a much smaller scale in the East Dismal since before the Civil War. The N&amp;O’s correspondent wrote: “Here for 75 years the people have removed the merchantable timber, cut down the remainder of the growth in the summer and fall and left it to dry out until early spring…. [They then] set fire to it so that a terrible fire has destroyed it all, leaving over the rich earth a mass of ashes and such charred poles and stumps as would soon decay….” The fires were great conflagrations: most of the East Dismal was a pocosin, a kind of raised peat bog, and the peat, used as a fuel in many parts of the world, was sometimes as much as 10-12 feet in depth. When drained, the upper layers of the peat dried out and grew especially combustible, leading to fires of almost unimaginable fury and environmental devastation– and capable of burning, in some cases, for months. While adopting a long-standing practice, the Wilkinsons applied that method of swamp reclamation on a much larger scale by introducing the use of steam dredges, massive canal digging projects, railroads, and mechanical logging equipment. “Day and night their labors and the labors of hundreds of employees, three locomotives, two dredges and five skidding machines have been wiping out the forest and transforming the great Albemarle swamp….” The not-very-good photo above (from the same issue of the N&amp;O) shows one of the canals that their dredges dug through the swamp.

" class="wp-image-83302" width="676" height="477" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/swamp-forest.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/swamp-forest-400x282.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/swamp-forest-200x141.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">According to the Raleigh News &amp; Observer (Aug. 28, 1910), the process that John A. and Samuel Wilkinson used to turn old-growth swamp forests into farmland had been used on a much smaller scale in the East Dismal since before the Civil War. The N&amp;O’s correspondent wrote: “Here for 75 years the people have removed the merchantable timber, cut down the remainder of the growth in the summer and fall and left it to dry out until early spring…. [They then] set fire to it so that a terrible fire has destroyed it all, leaving over the rich earth a mass of ashes and such charred poles and stumps as would soon decay….” The fires were great conflagrations: most of the East Dismal was a pocosin, a kind of raised peat bog, and the peat, used as a fuel in many parts of the world, was sometimes as much as 10-12 feet in depth. When drained, the upper layers of the peat dried out and grew especially combustible, leading to fires of almost unimaginable fury and environmental devastation and capable of burning, in some cases, for months. While adopting a long-standing practice, the Wilkinsons applied that method of swamp reclamation on a much larger scale by introducing the use of steam dredges, massive canal digging projects, railroads, and mechanical logging equipment. “Day and night their labors and the labors of hundreds of employees, three locomotives, two dredges and five skidding machines have been wiping out the forest and transforming the great Albemarle swamp &#8230;” The not-very-good photo above (from the same issue of the N&amp;O) shows one of the canals that their dredges dug through the swamp. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-8-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/workers-in-east-dismal.webp" alt="African American workers in the East Dismal, ca. 1910. They were preparing to plant “stick corn” near Wonderland, the labor camp at Potter Farms. In July 1918, a journal called Cut-Over Lands (vol. 1, #4) described how the Wilkinson brothers used the planting of stick corn at two locales near the Pungo River– Potter Farms and Terra Ceia– as the final step in converting the swamp forest into agricultural fields: “About May 1st, after the cutting [of the forest], the entire area is burned over, the fire consuming all small stuff and partially consuming the larger logs and stumps. Immediately after the burn, corn is planted among the logs and stumps by the “stuck corn” method, without plowing. The work is done chiefly by negro men and women and consists of dropping the seed in a hole made with a small stick…. Native labor (chiefly colored men and women) gather the corn in the fall and bring it to the ditch banks, from which it is carted to the cribs. After the corn is gathered, the stalks are cut down, and about May 1st of the following year– the stalks serving as kindling– the land is again burned over, further consuming the logs and stumps which have had a year’s drying since the first burn. The consumption of the stumps is facilitated by the fact that the soil in settling after the removal of the water through the ditches, draws away from the upper portions of the roots, permitting the fire to attack them and work under the main portions of the stumps. After the removal of the second or third crop . . ., the remaining sticks and portions of logs and root snags are piled and burned.”

" class="wp-image-83303" width="676" height="303" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/workers-in-east-dismal.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/workers-in-east-dismal-400x179.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/workers-in-east-dismal-200x90.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">African American workers in the East Dismal 1910. They were preparing to plant “stick corn” near Wonderland, the labor camp at Potter Farms. In July 1918, a journal called <a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=pGfmAAAAMAAJ&amp;pg=RA3-PA14&amp;lpg=RA3-PA14&amp;dq=%22stuck+corn%22+belhaven&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=p1kUHfNSXn&amp;sig=ACfU3U1TzhDAq_Xt479mLuvoYUp4SOT57A&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=2ahUKEwiIj-OYxZyCAxXIk2oFHbsqAVIQ6AF6BAgJEAM#v=onepage&amp;q=%22stuck%20corn%22%20belhaven&amp;f=false" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Cut-Over Lands (vol. 1, #4</a>) described how the Wilkinson brothers used the planting of stick corn at two locales near the Pungo River, Potter Farms and Terra Ceia, as the final step in converting the swamp forest into agricultural fields: “About May 1st, after the cutting [of the forest], the entire area is burned over, the fire consuming all small stuff and partially consuming the larger logs and stumps. Immediately after the burn, corn is planted among the logs and stumps by the &#8216;“&#8217;stuck corn&#8217;”&#8217; method, without plowing. The work is done chiefly by negro men and women and consists of dropping the seed in a hole made with a small stick…. Native labor (chiefly colored men and women) gather the corn in the fall and bring it to the ditch banks, from which it is carted to the cribs. After the corn is gathered, the stalks are cut down, and about May 1st of the following year &#8212; the stalks serving as kindling &#8212; the land is again burned over, further consuming the logs and stumps which have had a year’s drying since the first burn. The consumption of the stumps is facilitated by the fact that the soil in settling after the removal of the water through the ditches, draws away from the upper portions of the roots, permitting the fire to attack them and work under the main portions of the stumps. After the removal of the second or third crop . . ., the remaining sticks and portions of logs and root snags are piled and burned.” </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-9-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="484" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/swamp-forest-near-pungo-river.webp" alt="This is a logging crew and a logging machine called a “skidder“ finishing off a section of black gum (Nyssa sylvatica, also called “tupelo gum”) swamp forest  near the Pungo River, ca. 1907-1912. In 1910 a reporter visited one of the  Wilkinson brothers’  logging crews in the East Dismal and described a skidder’s operation. He wrote: “By and by, . . . the position of the`skidder’ was revealed by clouds of steam and the voices of the loggers became audible. Then around an abrupt curve the odd machine came into view as it tugged away at a heavy log some distance off to one side…. A wire rope more than 100 yards long and with a hook at its free end was hitched about the log and the drum of the `skidder’ was winding up the stout cord while the heavy piece of timber came smashing through the undergrowth, mowing down brush and breaking and crushing the saplings. . . .There is something thrilling about seeing one of these big logs pulled by the rope, come tumbling through the bushes and smaller timber as lightly almost as if it were a toothpick. . ..  From the woods, by means of the tram road, the logs are gotten out and sent to the mills in Belhaven, where . . .  they are speedily cut up into lumber for building and other purposes, including the manufacture of blocks for street paving, the black gum wood being found suitable for the latter purpose.” (Republished from the Manufacturers Record  in the Raleigh News &amp; Observer, 28 Aug. 1910.)" class="wp-image-83304" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/swamp-forest-near-pungo-river.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/swamp-forest-near-pungo-river-400x286.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/swamp-forest-near-pungo-river-200x143.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">This is a logging crew and a logging machine called a “skidder“ finishing off a section of black gum (Nyssa sylvatica, also called “tupelo gum”) swamp forest near the Pungo River 1907-1912. In 1910, a reporter visited one of the  Wilkinson brothers’  logging crews in the East Dismal and described a skidder’s operation. He wrote: “By and by, . . . the position of the `skidder’ was revealed by clouds of steam and the voices of the loggers became audible. Then around an abrupt curve the odd machine came into view as it tugged away at a heavy log some distance off to one side…. A wire rope more than 100 yards long and with a hook at its free end was hitched about the log and the drum of the `skidder’ was winding up the stout cord while the heavy piece of timber came smashing through the undergrowth, mowing down brush and breaking and crushing the saplings. . . .There is something thrilling about seeing one of these big logs pulled by the rope, come tumbling through the bushes and smaller timber as lightly almost as if it were a toothpick. . ..  From the woods, by means of the tram road, the logs are gotten out and sent to the mills in Belhaven, where . . .  they are speedily cut up into lumber for building and other purposes, including the manufacture of blocks for street paving, the black gum wood being found suitable for the latter purpose.” (Republished from the Manufacturers Record  in the Raleigh News &amp; Observer, 28 Aug. 1910.)</figcaption></figure>
</div>

<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="664" height="1024" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/railroad-lumber-map.webp" alt="The John L. Roper Co. and the Wilkinson brothers were not the only lumber interests at work in the vicinity of the Pungo River. There were probably 10 or 12 lumber mill boomtowns and scores of logging camps located within 15 miles of the Pungo between 1870 and 1930. On this map, for instance, we see the logging village of Waring (later known as Dymond or Dymond City) and the Jamesville &amp; Washington Railroad and Lumber Co.’s extensive land holdings ca. 1890. Located several miles west of the Pungo, the 21-mile-long railroad– known whimsically as the “Jolt and Wiggle”– was built– like all the region’s railroads– primarily for logging and the lumber trade. In the case of the J&amp;W, the purpose of the railroad was to carry logs to its mill in Waring and then to carry lumber that was milled in Waring to freight vessels in Jamesville, on the Roanoke River, or in Washington, N.C., on the Pamlico River. On the map, note the large stands of bald cypress and Atlantic white cedar (juniper) in those swamp forests, especially northeast and southeast of Waring and in the headwaters of Deep Run Creek. According to a Feb. 3, 1963 article in The State, Waring was settled principally by Quakers and had a sawmill, a 32-room boardinghouse, a 3-story company store, worker housing, and a railroad shop. Since its abandonment, Dymond– as it is usually remembered today–  has been the subject of more than a few ghost stories. F. Lightfoot, “Map of the Jamesville and Washington Railroad &amp; Lumber Co.’s Land and Railroad,” ca. 1885-1905, Getsinger Family Papers, ECU Digital Collections

" class="wp-image-83305" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/railroad-lumber-map.webp 664w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/railroad-lumber-map-259x400.webp 259w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/railroad-lumber-map-130x200.webp 130w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 664px) 100vw, 664px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The John L. Roper Co. and the Wilkinson brothers were not the only lumber interests at work in the vicinity of the Pungo River. There were probably 10 or 12 lumber mill boomtowns and scores of logging camps located within 15 miles of the Pungo between 1870 and 1930. On this map, for instance, we see the logging village of Waring (later known as Dymond or Dymond City) and the Jamesville &amp; Washington Railroad and Lumber Co.’s extensive land holdings 1890. Located several miles west of the Pungo, the 21-mile-long railroad, known whimsically as the “Jolt and Wiggle,” was built, like all the region’s railroads. primarily for logging and the lumber trade. In the case of the J&amp;W, the purpose of the railroad was to carry logs to its mill in Waring and then to carry lumber that was milled in Waring to freight vessels in Jamesville, on the Roanoke River, or in Washington on the Pamlico River. On the map, note the large stands of bald cypress and Atlantic white cedar (juniper) in those swamp forests, especially northeast and southeast of Waring and in the headwaters of Deep Run Creek. According to a Feb. 3, 1963, article in The State, Waring was settled principally by Quakers and had a sawmill, a 32-room boardinghouse, a 3-story company store, worker housing, and a railroad shop. Since its abandonment, Dymond, as it is usually remembered today, has been the subject of more than a few ghost stories. F. Lightfoot, “Map of the Jamesville and Washington Railroad &amp; Lumber Co.’s Land and Railroad,” ca. 1885-1905, Getsinger Family Papers, ECU Digital Collections </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-11-</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1000" height="648" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/belhaven-postcard.jpg" alt="Established in Belhaven in 1905, the Interstate Cooperage Co. was the largest mill on the Pungo River in the early 20th century and was one of the largest lumber mills anywhere on the North Carolina coast. In the early 1900s, the company acquired the rights to hundreds of thousands of acres of forestland in at least Hyde, Beaufort, Carteret, Craven, and Jones counties, including a large part of what is now the Croatan National Forest. The company’s property on the Pungo included a sprawling sawmill, dry kilns, a stave mill, a barrel factory, and what was said to be the largest box factory in the world. Among much else, Interstate turned out the barrels and pallets that its owner, Standard Oil (the world’s largest petroleum company at that time), used for shipping petroleum. Somewhere between 600 and 900 workers, the vast majority of them African American, worked at the company’s mill in Belhaven, while many more toiled in its logging camps. Among its workers were also recent immigrant laborers brought south by labor agents.  Lumber and railroad companies in the vicinity of the East Dismal employed sizable numbers of Russian, Polish, Italian, Greek, Hungarian, Latin American, and other immigrants, especially between 1900 and 1925. Postcard from the Moore Family Papers, East Carolina University Digital Collections

" class="wp-image-83306" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/belhaven-postcard.jpg 1000w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/belhaven-postcard-400x259.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/belhaven-postcard-200x130.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/belhaven-postcard-768x498.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Established in Belhaven in 1905, the Interstate Cooperage Co. was the largest mill on the Pungo River in the early 20th century and was one of the largest lumber mills anywhere on the North Carolina coast. In the early 1900s, the company acquired the rights to hundreds of thousands of acres of forestland in at least Hyde, Beaufort, Carteret, Craven, and Jones counties, including a large part of what is now the <a href="https://www.fs.usda.gov/recarea/nfsnc/recarea/?recid=48466" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Croatan National Forest</a>. The company’s property on the Pungo included a sprawling sawmill, dry kilns, a stave mill, a barrel factory, and what was said to be the largest box factory in the world. Among much else, Interstate turned out the barrels and pallets that its owner, Standard Oil (the world’s largest petroleum company at that time), used for shipping petroleum. Somewhere between 600 and 900 workers, the vast majority of them African American, worked at the company’s mill in Belhaven, while many more toiled in its logging camps. Among its workers were also recent immigrant laborers brought south by labor agents.  Lumber and railroad companies in the vicinity of the East Dismal employed sizable numbers of Russian, Polish, Italian, Greek, Hungarian, Latin American, and other immigrants, especially between 1900 and 1925. Postcard from the Moore Family Papers, East Carolina University Digital Collections </figcaption></figure>



<p class="has-text-align-center">-12-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="430" height="576" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/enquirer-southerner.webp" alt="Prior to and immediately after the Civil War, the Albemarle Swamp Land Company was the largest logging operation in the East Dismal Swamp. Chartered in 1840, the company’s shingle and lumber mills, blacksmith shop, and worker housing were all located in Pantego, a small village on Pantego Creek, a tributary of the Pungo River. The company owned approximately 100,000 acres of swamp forest, most of it in the headwaters of the Pungo River and east toward Alligator Lake. In its Oct. 2, 1874 issue, the Tarboro Enquirer Southerner printed a letter that describes the company’s operations after the war, when it still relied on wooden railroad track with logging cars hauled by mules. The newspaper’s correspondent– he signed his letter “Zara.”– wrote: “They make a large quantity of juniper shingles on their lands, which are brought to this place by carting to the river, they are then floated 10 miles and . . . brought the balance of the way (5 miles) on a railroad with a mule for an engine and a negro boy for conductor and engineer. . ..  Vessels large enough to sail to Philadelphia and New York can come to within 4 or 5 miles, which distance the shingles are carried in large flats.” The John H. Roper Lumber Co. later bought out the company’s land holdings.

" class="wp-image-83307" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/enquirer-southerner.webp 430w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/enquirer-southerner-299x400.webp 299w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/enquirer-southerner-149x200.webp 149w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 430px) 100vw, 430px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Prior to and immediately after the Civil War, the Albemarle Swamp Land Co. was the largest logging operation in the East Dismal Swamp. Chartered in 1840, the company’s shingle and lumber mills, blacksmith shop, and worker housing were all located in Pantego, a small village on Pantego Creek, a tributary of the Pungo River. The company owned approximately 100,000 acres of swamp forest, most of it in the headwaters of the Pungo River and east toward Alligator Lake. In its Oct. 2, 1874 issue, the Tarboro Enquirer Southerner printed a letter that describes the company’s operations after the war, when it still relied on wooden railroad track with logging cars hauled by mules. The newspaper’s correspondent &#8212; he signed his letter “Zara.” &#8212;  wrote: “They make a large quantity of juniper shingles on their lands, which are brought to this place by carting to the river, they are then floated 10 miles and . . . brought the balance of the way (5 miles) on a railroad with a mule for an engine and a negro boy for conductor and engineer. . ..  Vessels large enough to sail to Philadelphia and New York can come to within 4 or 5 miles, which distance the shingles are carried in large flats.” The John H. Roper Lumber Co. later bought out the company’s land holdings. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-13-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="712" height="418" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/high-wheeled-cart.webp" alt="According to local historian Elizabeth Parker Roberts, loggers used oxen to haul high-wheeled carts laden with Atlantic white cedar (juniper) logs out of the Pike Road section of the East Dismal Swamp beginning in the 1890s. As discussed above, the Albemarle Swamp Land Co. had earlier used a similar, if somewhat rougher route to transport logs to its mills in Pantego: first using oxen and probably horses to haul logs out of swamplands to the Pungo River, then floating the logs down the river to a creek called Indian Run. At a landing on Indian Run, they loaded the logs onto railroad cars that were pulled by mules over hand-hewn wooden rails to Pantego, a distance of 4 miles. The company sent its finished shingles, staves and other products from Pantego to a wharf on the Pungo River over a similar rail system. According to a letter from Pantego published in the Democratic Advocate, in Westminster, Maryland (12 Mar. 1871), the company shipped its products directly to Philadelphia and Providence, Rhode Island. Photo courtesy, W. Mayo. Originally published in Elizabeth Parker Roberts, Family and Friends: Pine Town, North Carolina, 1893-1918.

" class="wp-image-83308" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/high-wheeled-cart.webp 712w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/high-wheeled-cart-400x235.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/high-wheeled-cart-200x117.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 712px) 100vw, 712px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">According to local historian Elizabeth Parker Roberts, loggers used oxen to haul high-wheeled carts laden with Atlantic white cedar (juniper) logs out of the Pike Road section of the East Dismal Swamp beginning in the 1890s. As discussed above, the Albemarle Swamp Land Co. had earlier used a similar, if somewhat rougher route to transport logs to its mills in Pantego: first using oxen and probably horses to haul logs out of swamplands to the Pungo River, then floating the logs down the river to a creek called Indian Run. At a landing on Indian Run, they loaded the logs onto railroad cars that were pulled by mules over hand-hewn wooden rails to Pantego, a distance of 4 miles. The company sent its finished shingles, staves and other products from Pantego to a wharf on the Pungo River over a similar rail system. According to a letter from Pantego published in the Democratic Advocate, in Westminster, Maryland (12 Mar. 1871), the company shipped its products directly to Philadelphia and Providence, Rhode Island. Photo courtesy, W. Mayo. Originally published in Elizabeth Parker Roberts, Family and Friends: Pine Town, North Carolina, 1893-1918.

</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-14-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="507" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/1844-survey-map.webp" alt="On this 1844 survey map, we can see the blackwater creek known as Indian Run and the point where it flows into the upper part of the Pungo River. The Albemarle Swamp Land Company’s mule-powered railroad ran from Indian Run several miles southwest to the company’s shingle mill in the village of Pantego. The surrounding lands were pocosins, bald cypress swamps, and other wetlands. Detail from Washington W. Hayman, “A Map of the Albemarle Swamp Land Company’s Lands… near Lake Pungo and Pungo River” (1844). Courtesy, State Archives of North Carolina

" class="wp-image-83309" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/1844-survey-map.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/1844-survey-map-400x300.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/1844-survey-map-200x150.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">On this 1844 survey map, we can see the blackwater creek known as Indian Run and the point where it flows into the upper part of the Pungo River. The Albemarle Swamp Land Co.’s mule-powered railroad ran from Indian Run several miles southwest to the company’s shingle mill in the village of Pantego. The surrounding lands were pocosins, bald cypress swamps, and other wetlands. Detail from Washington W. Hayman, “<a href="https://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/ncmaps/id/4386/rec/3" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">A Map of the Albemarle Swamp Land Company’s Lands… near Lake Pungo and Pungo River</a>” (1844). Courtesy, State Archives of North Carolina </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-15-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="265" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Belhaven-1907.webp" alt="A view of the John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s planing mill on the Pungo River at Belhaven, N.C., ca. 1907.  In its early days, Belhaven was a company town bought, built and run by a railroad– the Norfolk &amp; Southern– and a company– the John L. Roper Lumber Co.– that were both bent on making a fortune logging the ancient forests in and around the East Dismal Swamp. Prior to 1890, a little oystering village called Jack’s Leg was all that was located on that part of the Pungo. That changed almost overnight. The area’s transformation began when the Norfolk &amp; Southern ran a line to Jack’s Leg. The railroad’s president then financially backed a local farmer and veteran lumberman named John A. Wilkinson to establish a new lumber mill on that part of the Pungo River. That mill would become part of the John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s empire. Wilkinson and his brother Samuel, with whom he often partnered in business matters, knew the southern part of the East Dismal like few others: they had grown up in a small farming settlement called Wilkinson that is a few miles northwest of Belhaven, on the edge of Pantego Swamp. Samuel Wilkinson continued to farm there throughout his life. Photo courtesy, American Lumberman, April 27, 1907.

" class="wp-image-83310" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Belhaven-1907.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Belhaven-1907-400x157.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Belhaven-1907-200x78.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A view of the John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s planing mill on the Pungo River at Belhaven 1907.  In its early days, Belhaven was a company town bought, built and run by a railroad, the Norfolk &amp; Southern, and a company, the John L. Roper Lumber Co., which were both bent on making a fortune logging the ancient forests in and around the East Dismal Swamp. Prior to 1890, a little oystering village called Jack’s Leg was all that was located on that part of the Pungo. That changed almost overnight. The area’s transformation began when the Norfolk &amp; Southern ran a line to Jack’s Leg. The railroad’s president then financially backed a local farmer and veteran lumberman named John A. Wilkinson to establish a new lumber mill on that part of the Pungo River. That mill would become part of the John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s empire. Wilkinson and his brother Samuel, with whom he often partnered in business matters, knew the southern part of the East Dismal like few others: they had grown up in a small farming settlement called Wilkinson that is a few miles northwest of Belhaven, on the edge of Pantego Swamp. Samuel Wilkinson continued to farm there throughout his life. Photo courtesy, <a href="https://www.google.com/books/edition/American_Lumberman/XbGGQ38WXlQC?hl=en&amp;gbpv=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">American Lumberman</a>, April 27, 1907. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-16-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="799" height="644" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/The-John-L.-Roper-Lumber-Co.s-power-plant-Belhaven-N.C.-ca.-1906.jpg" alt="The John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s power plant, Belhaven, N.C., ca. 1906.  In 1893, with the arrival of the railroad and the construction of the Roper Company’s mill, Jack’s Leg was rechristened Belhaven. Within a year, the town’s population rose from 78 to 700. In addition to the sawmill and planing mill, John H. Wilkinson and his brother Samuel established a company store, an ice plant, a light and power plant, and other businesses. Whole neighborhoods of shanties, shotgun houses and boardinghouses– West Belhaven, Black Bottom, Rittertown– were built. Within a few years, Belhaven was home to a half-dozen lumber mills. Lumber barges and log rafts crowded the Pungo. Visitors reported that the whistle of the Norfolk &amp; Southern’s log trains could be heard night and day, seven days a week. Even during the Great Depression, as many as a thousand carloads of lumber left the town by rail a year. Courtesy, H. H. Bromley Collection, State Archives of North Carolina

" class="wp-image-83311" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/The-John-L.-Roper-Lumber-Co.s-power-plant-Belhaven-N.C.-ca.-1906.jpg 799w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/The-John-L.-Roper-Lumber-Co.s-power-plant-Belhaven-N.C.-ca.-1906-400x322.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/The-John-L.-Roper-Lumber-Co.s-power-plant-Belhaven-N.C.-ca.-1906-200x161.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/The-John-L.-Roper-Lumber-Co.s-power-plant-Belhaven-N.C.-ca.-1906-768x619.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 799px) 100vw, 799px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s power plant, Belhaven 1906.  In 1893, with the arrival of the railroad and the construction of the Roper Co.’s mill, Jack’s Leg was rechristened Belhaven. Within a year, the town’s population rose from 78 to 700. In addition to the sawmill and planing mill, John H. Wilkinson and his brother Samuel established a company store, an ice plant, a light and power plant, and other businesses. Whole neighborhoods of shanties, shotgun houses and boardinghouses– West Belhaven, Black Bottom, Rittertown– were built. Within a few years, Belhaven was home to a half-dozen lumber mills. Lumber barges and log rafts crowded the Pungo. Visitors reported that the whistle of the Norfolk &amp; Southern’s log trains could be heard night and day, seven days a week. Even during the Great Depression, as many as a thousand carloads of lumber left the town by rail a year. Courtesy, H. H. Bromley Collection, State Archives of North Carolina </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-17-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="507" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/railroad-stock.webp" alt="Stock certificate for the Roanoke Railroad &amp; Lumber Co., 1928. In the 1880s, a Philadelphia lumber baron named Clarence Branning established a lumber mill village called Bayside on the Pamlico River, 12 miles southwest of Belhaven. His company also built a logging railroad, the Bayside &amp; Yeatesville, that connected the mill to timber holdings in Yeatesville, Bath, and Pamlico Beach. Branning sold the mill, railroad, and the village–  “everything except the walnut desk belonging to Mr. Branning,” according to one source– to the Roanoke Railroad &amp; Lumber Co. in 1887. Life in Bayside revolved around the mill and the lumber trains until 1919, when the mill burned. After the company left Bayside for good, the village’s name was changed to Bayview and it gradually became the little community that it is today. Note: According to a reminiscence later published in the Nashville Graphic (Nashville, N.C., 23 June 1953), the Roanoke Railroad &amp;  Lumber Co. brought in “Russian, Italian and Arabian workers” to work at its mill in Momeyer, in a different part of eastern N.C. I would expect that the company also employed a significant number of immigrant laborers at its mill in Bayside.

" class="wp-image-83312" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/railroad-stock.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/railroad-stock-400x300.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/railroad-stock-200x150.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Stock certificate for the Roanoke Railroad &amp; Lumber Co., 1928. In the 1880s, a Philadelphia lumber baron named Clarence Branning established a lumber mill village called Bayside on the Pamlico River, 12 miles southwest of Belhaven. His company also built a logging railroad, the Bayside &amp; Yeatesville, that connected the mill to timber holdings in Yeatesville, Bath and Pamlico Beach. Branning sold the mill, railroad, and the village &#8212; “everything except the walnut desk belonging to Mr. Branning,” according to one source &#8212; to the Roanoke Railroad &amp; Lumber Co. in 1887. Life in Bayside revolved around the mill and the lumber trains until 1919, when the mill burned. After the company left Bayside for good, the village’s name was changed to Bayview and it gradually became the little community that it is today. Note: According to a reminiscence later published in the Nashville Graphic (Nashville, June 23, 1953), the Roanoke Railroad &amp;  Lumber Co. brought in “Russian, Italian and Arabian workers” to work at its mill in Momeyer, in a different part of eastern N.C. I would expect that the company also employed a significant number of immigrant laborers at its mill in Bayside. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-18-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="758" height="568" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/roper.webp" alt="The John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s company store in yet another lumber boomtown–  Roper,  10 miles north of the Pungo’s headwaters, ca. 1907. Lee’s Mill– the name of the settlement until the company arrived in 1889– had been the site of small-scale shingle and lumber mills since the 1700s. Prior to the Civil War, local milling companies loaded their wood products onto flatboats and floated them down Kendrick Creek to the Albemarle Sound, where they were transferred onto sloops and schooners for shipment north. When the John L. Roper Lumber Co. and the Norfolk &amp; Southern Railroad arrived however,  everything changed, including the village’s name. Hundreds of new residents moved to Roper to work in the company’s mills. Electric lights illuminated the streets. Shops, boardinghouses, inns, and taverns and the like opened in the booming village, as did the impressive company store that we see here, which was part grocery, part hardware store, part pharmacy, and part bank (or perhaps more accurately, part payday lender). Trains came and went several times a day, and the voices of people from all over the U.S. and other nations  could be heard in the village streets. Photo from American Lumberman, April 27, 1907.

" class="wp-image-83313" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/roper.webp 758w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/roper-400x300.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/roper-200x150.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 758px) 100vw, 758px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s company store in yet another lumber boomtown: Roper, 10 miles north of the Pungo’s headwaters 1907. Lee’s Mill– the name of the settlement until the company arrived in 1889– had been the site of small-scale shingle and lumber mills since the 1700s. Prior to the Civil War, local milling companies loaded their wood products onto flatboats and floated them down Kendrick Creek to the Albemarle Sound, where they were transferred onto sloops and schooners for shipment north. When the John L. Roper Lumber Co. and the Norfolk &amp; Southern Railroad arrived however,  everything changed, including the village’s name. Hundreds of new residents moved to Roper to work in the company’s mills. Electric lights illuminated the streets. Shops, boardinghouses, inns, and taverns and the like opened in the booming village, as did the impressive company store that we see here, which was part grocery, part hardware store, part pharmacy, and part bank (or perhaps more accurately, part payday lender). Trains came and went several times a day, and the voices of people from all over the U.S. and other nations  could be heard in the village streets. Photo from American Lumberman, April 27, 1907. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-19-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="457" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/juniper-mill-Roper.webp" alt="The John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s Atlantic white cedar (juniper) mill in Roper. The town of Roper was a lumber mill boomtown renown especially for this mill, said to be the largest cedar mill in the United States at that time. Moving left to right, we can see the mill’s water tower, power plant, the cedar sawmill, railroad cars, and the Norfolk &amp; Southern’s spur that led into the mill. On the near side of the tracks, we can see stacks of cedar shingles and laths. Railroads were central to all lumber companies on the North Carolina coast at that time: to move its logs and lumber, the Roper Lumber Co. is estimated to have built somewhere between 150 and 200 miles of railroad. The Roper plant had the company’s only mills that relied entirely on railroads for log deliveries– at the company’s other mill sites, logs also arrived by water.  Roper, unlike so many of the lumber boom towns, has found new life and is an incorporated town today, though it has been a long time since it was as bustling as it was when the Roper Lumber Co.’s mill was still in business. American Lumberman, April 27, 1907.

" class="wp-image-83314" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/juniper-mill-Roper.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/juniper-mill-Roper-400x270.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/juniper-mill-Roper-200x135.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s Atlantic white cedar (juniper) mill in Roper. The town of Roper was a lumber mill boomtown renown especially for this mill, said to be the largest cedar mill in the United States at that time. Moving left to right, we can see the mill’s water tower, power plant, the cedar sawmill, railroad cars, and the Norfolk &amp; Southern’s spur that led into the mill. On the near side of the tracks, we can see stacks of cedar shingles and laths. Railroads were central to all lumber companies on the North Carolina coast at that time: to move its logs and lumber, the Roper Lumber Co. is estimated to have built somewhere between 150 and 200 miles of railroad. The Roper plant had the company’s only mills that relied entirely on railroads for log deliveries &#8212; at the company’s other mill sites, logs also arrived by water.  Roper, unlike so many of the lumber boom towns, has found new life and is an incorporated town today, though it has been a long time since it was as bustling as it was when the Roper Lumber Co.’s mill was still in business. American Lumberman, April 27, 1907. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-20-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="507" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cedar-shingles.webp" alt="Atlantic white cedar (juniper) shingles at the John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s mill in Roper, N.C. In the 19th century, cedar shingles and shakes grew to be the most widely used roofing material on public buildings and residences in the U.S. By most accounts, the Roper company’s mill on the north side of the East Dismal was the country’s largest supplier of shingles in the late 19th and early 20th century. The impact of the company’s logging on the Atlantic white cedar forests of eastern N.C. was staggering: According to forestry researchers, more than half of the Atlantic white cedar forests in eastern North Carolina were cut down between 1880 and 1900, the bulk of them by the John L. Roper Lumber Co. and the Richmond Cedar Works (which operated in the vicinity of the Alligator River).  Very little, if any, of the Atlantic white cedar forests around the Pungo have survived to the present day. According to the N.C. Forest Service, 95% of the state’s Atlantic white cedar swamps have been lost over the last 120 years. The largest surviving white cedar forests in North Carolina, and probably the largest in the world, are now located in the Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge, in Dare County, N.C.  Photo from the American Lumberman, 27 April 1907

" class="wp-image-83315" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cedar-shingles.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cedar-shingles-400x300.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cedar-shingles-200x150.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Atlantic white cedar (juniper) shingles at the John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s mill in Roper, N.C. In the 19th century, cedar shingles and shakes grew to be the most widely used roofing material on public buildings and residences in the U.S. By most accounts, the Roper company’s mill on the north side of the East Dismal was the country’s largest supplier of shingles in the late 19th and early 20th century. The impact of the company’s logging on the Atlantic white cedar forests of eastern N.C. was staggering: According to forestry researchers, more than half of the Atlantic white cedar forests in eastern North Carolina were cut down between 1880 and 1900, the bulk of them by the John L. Roper Lumber Co. and the Richmond Cedar Works (which operated in the vicinity of the Alligator River).  Very little, if any, of the Atlantic white cedar forests around the Pungo have survived to the present day. According to the <a href="https://ncforestservice.gov/Managing_your_forest/atlantic_white_cedar.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">N.C. Forest Service</a>, 95% of the state’s Atlantic white cedar swamps have been lost over the last 120 years. The largest surviving white cedar forests in North Carolina, and probably the largest in the world, are now located in the <a href="https://www.fws.gov/refuge/alligator-river" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge</a>, in Dare County, N.C.  Photo from the American Lumberman, 27 April 1907 </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-21-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="901" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/logging-railroad.webp" alt="This is a logging railroad through a black gum swamp forest roughly 10 miles northeast of the Pungo River’s headwaters, ca. 1900-1907. Black gum (Nyssa sylvatica)— also known as tupelo, tupelo gum or sour gum– flourished in the swamp forests along the Pungo’s shores and throughout much of the North Carolina coast. A deciduous species of medium height, black gum trees can sometimes live more than 500 years. Their early-ripening fruit plays an especially important role as a food source for migrating birds in the fall, and of course “tupelo honey” is widely treasured. Tough, cross-grained, and difficult to split, the wood has historically been used to make railroad ties, paving blocks, mauls, pulleys, and the like. In North Carolina’s coastal villages, black gum was also a preferred wood for making pound net stakes, net floats, and waterfowl decoys.

" class="wp-image-83316" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/logging-railroad.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/logging-railroad-300x400.webp 300w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/logging-railroad-150x200.webp 150w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">This is a logging railroad through a black gum swamp forest roughly 10 miles northeast of the Pungo River’s headwaters, ca. 1900-1907. Black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) &#8212; also known as tupelo, tupelo gum or sour gum &#8212; flourished in the swamp forests along the Pungo’s shores and throughout much of the North Carolina coast. A deciduous species of medium height, black gum trees can sometimes live more than 500 years. Their early-ripening fruit plays an especially important role as a food source for migrating birds in the fall, and of course “tupelo honey” is widely treasured. Tough, cross-grained, and difficult to split, the wood has historically been used to make railroad ties, paving blocks, mauls, pulleys, and the like. In North Carolina’s coastal villages, black gum was also a preferred wood for making pound net stakes, net floats, and waterfowl decoys. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-22-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="836" height="434" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Eureka-lumber-mill.webp" alt="Even lumber mills some distance from the Pungo exploited the East Dismal’s swamp forests. One of them was that of the Eureka Lumber Co., which for many years was the largest lumber mill in Washington, N.C. One of the company’s sources of logs was the Pungo River. The company’s lumbermen shipped logs from the Pungo up the Pamlico River to its mill (seen here), a distance of about 30 miles, and also east from extensive land holdings well up the Tar River. In 1904-08, the company also ran a logging railroad 40 miles southeast to Vandemere, in Pamlico County. Organized in 1892, the company specialized in producing, among other things, the wooden beams that held up mine shafts. Photo courtesy, Sabin Leach

" class="wp-image-83317" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Eureka-lumber-mill.webp 836w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Eureka-lumber-mill-400x208.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Eureka-lumber-mill-200x104.webp 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Eureka-lumber-mill-768x399.webp 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 836px) 100vw, 836px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Even lumber mills some distance from the Pungo exploited the East Dismal’s swamp forests. One of them was that of the Eureka Lumber Co., which for many years was the largest lumber mill in Washington, N.C. One of the company’s sources of logs was the Pungo River. The company’s lumbermen shipped logs from the Pungo up the Pamlico River to its mill (seen here), a distance of about 30 miles, and also east from extensive land holdings well up the Tar River. In 1904-08, the company also ran a logging railroad 40 miles <a href="https://www.carolana.com/NC/Transportation/railroads/nc_rrs_washington_vandemere.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">southeast to Vandemere, in Pamlico County</a>. Organized in 1892, the company specialized in producing, among other things, the wooden beams that held up mine shafts. Photo courtesy, Sabin Leach </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-23-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="507" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/death-knell.webp" alt="A crew of the John H. Roper Lumber Co.’s loggers using a steam skidder in a section of the East Dismal 9 or 10 miles northeast of the Pungo River’s headwaters. A technological revolution in logging technology may have been the first note in the East Dismal’s death knell. The industry’s adoption of steam power and railroads in the late 1800s meant that logging no longer had to  occur in the proximity of a waterway: railroads could reach into the interior of swamp forests, and logs and logging machinery could be moved by rail. The first successful steel-railed logging railroad in the U.S. was built in 1876– and the number of those logging roads in the U.S. rose from zero to 30,000 by 1910. Steam skidding (as we see in this photograph) and the first widely used steam-powered log loaders only appeared in the 1880s. Innovations in crosscut saws– the invention of raker teeth and the use of tempered steel blades–  also made logging more efficient. (Gasoline powered chain saws were not widely used until after World War Two.) Especially when combined with the use of steam-powered dredges to drain wetlands and make them more accessible to loggers, those developments meant that forests such as those in the East Dismal, that had previously seemed far less vulnerable to large-scale commercial logging, were suddenly in danger. American Lumberman, April 27, 1907.

" class="wp-image-83318" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/death-knell.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/death-knell-400x300.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/death-knell-200x150.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A crew of the John H. Roper Lumber Co.’s loggers using a steam skidder in a section of the East Dismal 9 or 10 miles northeast of the Pungo River’s headwaters. A technological revolution in logging technology may have been the first note in the East Dismal’s death knell. The industry’s adoption of steam power and railroads in the late 1800s meant that logging no longer had to  occur in the proximity of a waterway: railroads could reach into the interior of swamp forests, and logs and logging machinery could be moved by rail. The first successful steel-railed logging railroad in the U.S. was built in 1876 &#8212; and the number of those logging roads in the U.S. rose from zero to 30,000 by 1910. Steam skidding (as we see in this photograph) and the first widely used steam-powered log loaders only appeared in the 1880s. Innovations in crosscut saws– the invention of raker teeth and the use of tempered steel blades–  also made logging more efficient. (Gasoline powered chain saws were not widely used until after World War Two.) Especially when combined with the use of steam-powered dredges to drain wetlands and make them more accessible to loggers, those developments meant that forests such as those in the East Dismal, that had previously seemed far less vulnerable to large-scale commercial logging, were suddenly in danger. American Lumberman, April 27, 1907. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-24-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="846" height="594" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/locomotive.webp" alt="A locomotive hauling a load of logs out of a swamp forest near the Pungo River, ca. 1910-12. Surry Parker, a designer and builder of steam logging machinery, published this photograph in his company’s 1912 catalog to illustrate how the use of railroads and steam logging machinery opened up even the soggiest parts of swamp forests to logging. Source: Surry Parker, Steam Logging Machinery (Pine Town, N.C., 1912). Copy, North Carolina, UNC-Chapel Hill

" class="wp-image-83319" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/locomotive.webp 846w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/locomotive-400x281.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/locomotive-200x140.webp 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/locomotive-768x539.webp 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 846px) 100vw, 846px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A locomotive hauling a load of logs out of a swamp forest near the Pungo River 1910-12. Surry Parker, a designer and builder of steam logging machinery, published this photograph in his company’s 1912 catalog to illustrate how the use of railroads and steam logging machinery opened up even the soggiest parts of swamp forests to logging. Source: Surry Parker, Steam Logging Machinery (Pine Town, N.C., 1912). Copy, North Carolina, UNC-Chapel Hill </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-25-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="507" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/innovations.webp" alt="Technological innovations in sawmills were no less important to the East Dismal’s fate than those in logging. In the late 1800s, the introduction of steam feeds, log rollers, dry kilns, band saws (like this one at the John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s cedar mill in Roper, N.C.), mechanical carriers, so-called endless chains (for bringing logs into mills) and planing machines, among much else, all dramatically increased the milling capacity of sawmills, with far-reaching consequences for forests such as those in the East Dismal. Photo from American Lumberman, April 27, 1907.

" class="wp-image-83320" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/innovations.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/innovations-400x300.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/innovations-200x150.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Technological innovations in sawmills were no less important to the East Dismal’s fate than those in logging. In the late 1800s, the introduction of steam feeds, log rollers, dry kilns, band saws, like this one at the John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s cedar mill in Roper, mechanical carriers, so-called endless chains (for bringing logs into mills) and planing machines, among much else, all dramatically increased the milling capacity of sawmills, with far-reaching consequences for forests such as those in the East Dismal. Photo from American Lumberman, April 27, 1907. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-26-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="507" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/berkley.webp" alt="In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, another cluster of lumber mill towns and logging camps was located on the east side of the Lower Pungo. This is a hand-drawn map of Berkley, a hard-drinking, hard-living shanty town that was home to many of the Scranton Land and Lumber Co.’s African American  workers. It sat on the north side of Scranton Creek, opposite the site of the company’s mill and the village of Scranton, yet another of the Pungo’s lumber boom towns. (Scranton Creek flows into the Pungo 8 miles upriver of Belhaven.) Chartered in Scranton, Penn., in 1889, the company had large land holdings on the east side of the Pungo in the 1890s. Local historian Morgan Harris recalled that Berkley had a reputation for being a refuge for drifters and the dispossessed, though of course one could say that of many logging camps and lumber mill villages in those days. Map courtesy, Morgan H. Harris, Hyde Yesterdays: A History of Hyde County

" class="wp-image-83321" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/berkley.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/berkley-400x300.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/berkley-200x150.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, another cluster of lumber mill towns and logging camps was located on the east side of the Lower Pungo. This is a hand-drawn map of Berkley, a hard-drinking, hard-living shanty town that was home to many of the Scranton Land and Lumber Co.’s African American  workers. It sat on the north side of Scranton Creek, opposite the site of the company’s mill and the village of Scranton, yet another of the Pungo’s lumber boom towns. (Scranton Creek flows into the Pungo 8 miles upriver of Belhaven.) Chartered in Scranton, Penn., in 1889, the company had large land holdings on the east side of the Pungo in the 1890s. Local historian Morgan Harris recalled that Berkley had a reputation for being a refuge for drifters and the dispossessed, though of course one could say that of many logging camps and lumber mill villages in those days. Map courtesy, Morgan H. Harris, Hyde Yesterdays: A History of Hyde County

</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-27-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="507" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/makleyville.webp" alt="Makleyville was another village that grew up around the Scranton Land and Lumber Co.’s operations on the east side of the Lower Pungo. It was located where Slade Creek flows into the Pungo, several miles downriver of  Belhaven. The Makleyville Hotel (seen here) served as the village’s hotel, boardinghouse, company store, and post office. Local buildings included sawmills, dry kilns, barracks for the largely African American workforce, a pair of warehouses, and a long wharf that reached into the Pungo. Most of the mill’s buildings were built on sawdust mounds and wharf pilings. Ethel Ayers Gibbs, the daughter of the hotel’s managers, recalled that she had “seen as many as six and eight big barges from Baltimore up at the mill loading at a time.” Makleyville was a bustling little town in its time, and a regular stop on the steamer lines that ran between Edenton and Washington, N.C. Like so many other lumber boomtowns, the town vanished after the last of its mills shut down. This photograph originally appeared in a 1949 article in the Belhaven Times by Ethel Ayers Gibbs and was re-published in the Beaufort-Hyde News (Belhaven, N.C.), 13 March 1980.

" class="wp-image-83322" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/makleyville.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/makleyville-400x300.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/makleyville-200x150.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Makleyville was another village that grew up around the Scranton Land and Lumber Co.’s operations on the east side of the Lower Pungo. It was located where Slade Creek flows into the Pungo, several miles downriver of  Belhaven. The Makleyville Hotel, shown here, served as the village’s hotel, boardinghouse, company store, and post office. Local buildings included sawmills, dry kilns, barracks for the largely African American workforce, a pair of warehouses, and a long wharf that reached into the Pungo. Most of the mill’s buildings were built on sawdust mounds and wharf pilings. Ethel Ayers Gibbs, the daughter of the hotel’s managers, recalled that she had “seen as many as six and eight big barges from Baltimore up at the mill loading at a time.” Makleyville was a bustling little town in its time, and a regular stop on the steamer lines that ran between Edenton and Washington, N.C. Like so many other lumber boomtowns, the town vanished after the last of its mills shut down. This photograph originally appeared in a 1949 article in the Belhaven Times by Ethel Ayers Gibbs and was re-published in the Beaufort-Hyde News, Belhaven, March 13, 1980. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-28-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="418" height="557" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/daily-expense.webp" alt="In 1899 life in Scranton revolved around the Alleghany Lumber Co.’s mill, purchased along with an estimated 100,000 acres of forestland from the Scranton Land and Lumber Co. ca. 1892-95. This is a page from a daily account book of the company’s workers and hours. Note the central role of railroad construction in logging in the forests along the Lower Pungo. On the day shown here– — May 29, 1899– roughly a quarter of the company’s workforce was building railroad spurs into the company’s forestlands. The company used those railroads to transport steam-powered skidders and loaders into even the most remote parts of the forest, and also used to them to haul logs back to the company’s mill in Scranton. After a section of forest was logged, workers would tear up the rails and run new lines into uncut parts of the forest. From Allegheny Lumber Co. Account Book, Outer Banks History Center

" class="wp-image-83323" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/daily-expense.webp 418w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/daily-expense-300x400.webp 300w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/daily-expense-150x200.webp 150w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 418px) 100vw, 418px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">In 1899 life in Scranton revolved around the Alleghany Lumber Co.’s mill, purchased along with an estimated 100,000 acres of forestland from the Scranton Land and Lumber Co. 1892-95. This is a page from a daily account book of the company’s workers and hours. Note the central role of railroad construction in logging in the forests along the Lower Pungo. On the day shown here &#8212; May 29, 1899 &#8212; roughly a quarter of the company’s workforce was building railroad spurs into the company’s forestlands. The company used those railroads to transport steam-powered skidders and loaders into even the most remote parts of the forest, and also used to them to haul logs back to the company’s mill in Scranton. After a section of forest was logged, workers would tear up the rails and run new lines into uncut parts of the forest. From <a href="https://axaem.archives.ncdcr.gov/findingaids/PC_5325_Allegheny_Lumber_Compan_.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Allegheny Lumber Co. Account Book</a>, Outer Banks History Center </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-29-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1280" height="514" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Log-train-coming-into-the-John-L.-Ropers-lumber-mill-in-Scranton-ca.-1907.-American-Lumberman-27-April-1907-1280x514.jpg" alt="Log train coming into the John L. Roper’s lumber mill in Scranton, ca. 1907. American Lumberman, 27 April 1907

" class="wp-image-83324" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Log-train-coming-into-the-John-L.-Ropers-lumber-mill-in-Scranton-ca.-1907.-American-Lumberman-27-April-1907-1280x514.jpg 1280w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Log-train-coming-into-the-John-L.-Ropers-lumber-mill-in-Scranton-ca.-1907.-American-Lumberman-27-April-1907-400x161.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Log-train-coming-into-the-John-L.-Ropers-lumber-mill-in-Scranton-ca.-1907.-American-Lumberman-27-April-1907-200x80.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Log-train-coming-into-the-John-L.-Ropers-lumber-mill-in-Scranton-ca.-1907.-American-Lumberman-27-April-1907-768x308.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Log-train-coming-into-the-John-L.-Ropers-lumber-mill-in-Scranton-ca.-1907.-American-Lumberman-27-April-1907-1536x617.jpg 1536w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Log-train-coming-into-the-John-L.-Ropers-lumber-mill-in-Scranton-ca.-1907.-American-Lumberman-27-April-1907-2048x822.jpg 2048w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Log-train-coming-into-the-John-L.-Ropers-lumber-mill-in-Scranton-ca.-1907.-American-Lumberman-27-April-1907.jpg 2000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Log train coming into the John L. Roper’s lumber mill in Scranton, ca. 1907. American Lumberman, 27 April 1907

</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-30-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="658" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/hand-drawn-map.webp" alt="This is a hand-drawn map of still another lumber mill village that was located in the vicinity of the Pungo River. The village’s name was Burrell, and it was the site of the Burrell Lumber Co.’s mill on the upper part of the Pungo River, ca. 1920s/30s. The village was located on the New Holland, Higginsport, and Mount Vernon Railroad, a 35-mile-long spur that ran from the Norfolk &amp; Southern’s main line in Wenona to Lake Mattamuskeet. As you can see on the map, Burrell included, besides the company’s mill,  a company store, a railroad station, and a large barracks for housing mill workers and loggers. According to local lore, Davis Landing (on the map just below the Burrell mill store and barracks) was the site of an Algonquin Indian village late into the 19th century. That village seemed to vanish with the forest. Courtesy, Morgan H. Harris, Hyde Yesterdays: A History of Hyde County

" class="wp-image-83325" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/hand-drawn-map.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/hand-drawn-map-400x389.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/hand-drawn-map-200x195.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">This is a hand-drawn map of still another lumber mill village that was located in the vicinity of the Pungo River. The village’s name was Burrell, and it was the site of the Burrell Lumber Co.’s mill on the upper part of the Pungo River, 920s-1930s. The village was located on the <a href="https://issuu.com/sencmagazine/docs/eastern_living_e-edition/s/10793664" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">New Holland, Higginsport, and Mount Vernon Railroad</a>, a 35-mile-long spur that ran from the Norfolk &amp; Southern’s main line in Wenona to Lake Mattamuskeet. As you can see on the map, Burrell included, besides the company’s mill,  a company store, a railroad station, and a large barracks for housing mill workers and loggers. According to local lore, Davis Landing (on the map just below the Burrell mill store and barracks) was the site of an Algonquin Indian village late into the 19th century. That village seemed to vanish with the forest. Courtesy, Morgan H. Harris, Hyde Yesterdays: A History of Hyde County </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-31-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="507" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/new-holland.webp" alt="Documentary sources tell us frustrating little about what daily life was like for the loggers, sawmill workers, and railroad builders who worked in the vicinity of the Pungo. One exception is a collection of newspaper accounts, court records, and other historical sources related to the brutality and peonage-like conditions that the builders of the New Holland, Higginsport, and Mount Vernon Railroad faced in the early 1920s. Originating on the Norfolk &amp; Southern’s main line in Wenona, the NHHMV ran through the lumber mill village of Burrell (site of Kirwan Station on this map) and on to Lake Mattamuskeet. Built primarily to supply coal to the pumping station in New Holland, the railroad also opened up a large section of swamp forest to logging. For more on the working conditions in the NHHMV’s work camps, see my recent story, “The Italian Workers: The Life and Times of the Immigrants who Built North Carolina’s Railroads.” This map is from The Official Standard Time of the Railways and Steam Navigation Lines of the United States, Porto Rico, Canada, Mexico and Cuba (July 1928).

" class="wp-image-83326" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/new-holland.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/new-holland-400x300.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/new-holland-200x150.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Documentary sources tell us frustrating little about what daily life was like for the loggers, sawmill workers, and railroad builders who worked in the vicinity of the Pungo. One exception is a collection of newspaper accounts, court records, and other historical sources related to the brutality and peonage-like conditions that the builders of the New Holland, Higginsport, and Mount Vernon Railroad faced in the early 1920s. Originating on the Norfolk &amp; Southern’s main line in Wenona, the NHHMV ran through the lumber mill village of Burrell (site of Kirwan Station on this map) and on to Lake Mattamuskeet. Built primarily to supply coal to the pumping station in New Holland, the railroad also opened up a large section of swamp forest to logging. For more on the working conditions in the NHHMV’s work camps, see my recent story, “<a href="https://davidcecelski.com/2023/09/08/the-italian-workers-the-life-and-times-of-the-immigrants-who-built-north-carolinas-railroads/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Italian Workers: The Life and Times of the Immigrants who Built North Carolina’s Railroads</a>.” This map is from The Official Standard Time of the Railways and Steam Navigation Lines of the United States, Porto Rico, Canada, Mexico and Cuba (July 1928). </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-32-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="506" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/riot-at-belhaven.webp" alt="For me headlines such as this– from the March 19, 1908 edition of the Washington Progress (Washington, N.C.)– show how much more I have to learn about the history of the region’s lumber industry workers. The story refers to a melee between local workers and immigrant workers at Interstate Cooperage’s mill in Belhaven that grew so violent that local officials called in the Washington Light Infantry to restore order. I do not fully understand the historical context for this conflict. However,  what I suspect, based on a variety of other sources, is that the company’s leaders had recruited Greek immigrants in the northern states as a way of undermining an effort by the local workers to improve pay and working conditions at Interstate Cooperage. It was not an isolated incident. I have caught glimpses, but only glimpses, of labor strikes, walk-outs, and the violent repression of worker organizing at lumber mills elsewhere on that part of the North Carolina coast. I do not think that I know enough to say more than that, except that I think it would be a difficult, but potentially promising, area of historical research.

" class="wp-image-83327" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/riot-at-belhaven.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/riot-at-belhaven-400x299.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/riot-at-belhaven-200x150.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">For me headlines such as this from the March 19, 1908 edition of the Washington Progress (Washington) show how much more I have to learn about the history of the region’s lumber industry workers. The story refers to a melee between local workers and immigrant workers at Interstate Cooperage’s mill in Belhaven that grew so violent that local officials called in the Washington Light Infantry to restore order. I do not fully understand the historical context for this conflict. However,  what I suspect, based on a variety of other sources, is that the company’s leaders had recruited Greek immigrants in the northern states as a way of undermining an effort by the local workers to improve pay and working conditions at Interstate Cooperage. It was not an isolated incident. I have caught glimpses, but only glimpses, of labor strikes, walk-outs, and the violent repression of worker organizing at lumber mills elsewhere on that part of the North Carolina coast. I do not think that I know enough to say more than that, except that I think it would be a difficult, but potentially promising, area of historical research. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-33-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="507" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/NS-railroad.webp" alt="This scene is one of the John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s log re-loading stations on the Norfolk &amp; Southern Railroad, probably somewhere in the first few miles of track north of Pantego. The big logs in the foreground are yellow poplars (Liriodendron tulipifera), or tulip trees, one of the largest native trees in eastern North America. They are known to reach heights of more than 175 feet at maturity. The tree’s wood had a large variety of uses, including in the construction of organs, coffins, wooden ware, and the interior finishing of houses. The logs in this photograph were destined for the company’s mill in Roper, 18 miles to the north. American Lumberman, April 27, 1907

" class="wp-image-83328" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/NS-railroad.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/NS-railroad-400x300.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/NS-railroad-200x150.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">This scene is one of the John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s log re-loading stations on the Norfolk &amp; Southern Railroad, probably somewhere in the first few miles of track north of Pantego. The big logs in the foreground are yellow poplars (Liriodendron tulipifera), or tulip trees, one of the largest native trees in eastern North America. They are known to reach heights of more than 175 feet at maturity. The tree’s wood had a large variety of uses, including in the construction of organs, coffins, wooden ware, and the interior finishing of houses. The logs in this photograph were destined for the company’s mill in Roper, 18 miles to the north. American Lumberman, April 27, 1907

</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-34-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="507" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/scranton.webp" alt="The John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s sawmill in Scranton, on the east side of the Lower Pungo River, ca. 1907. In the 1890s and early 1900s, the company gobbled up other lumber companies left and right, including at least three on the Pungo River– the Albemarle Swamp Land Co., the Belhaven Lumber Co., and the Alleghany Lumber Co. By the date of this photograph, the Roper Lumber Co. had reportedly accumulated land holdings totaling 600,000 acres and had leasing rights to another 200,000 acres on the North Carolina coast and in southeast Virginia. According to company reports, its mills were capable of sawing approx. 500,000 board ft. of lumber a day. In addition to its larger mills in Gilmerton, Va., and in Belhaven, Roper, Oriental, and New Bern, N.C., the company also had sizable but smaller sawmills in seven other locales on the North Carolina coast: Scranton, Pollocksville, Jacksonville, James City, Winthrop (at the mouth of Adams Creek), and two sites on Clubfoot Creek. American Lumberman, April 27, 1907.

" class="wp-image-83329" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/scranton.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/scranton-400x300.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/scranton-200x150.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s sawmill in Scranton, on the east side of the Lower Pungo River, ca. 1907. In the 1890s and early 1900s, the company gobbled up other lumber companies left and right, including at least three on the Pungo River– the Albemarle Swamp Land Co., the Belhaven Lumber Co., and the Alleghany Lumber Co. By the date of this photograph, the Roper Lumber Co. had reportedly accumulated land holdings totaling 600,000 acres and had leasing rights to another 200,000 acres on the North Carolina coast and in southeast Virginia. According to company reports, its mills were capable of sawing approx. 500,000 board ft. of lumber a day. In addition to its larger mills in Gilmerton, Va., and in Belhaven, Roper, Oriental, and New Bern, the company also had sizable but smaller sawmills in seven other locales on the North Carolina coast: Scranton, Pollocksville, Jacksonville, James City, Winthrop (at the mouth of Adams Creek), and two sites on Clubfoot Creek. American Lumberman, April 27, 1907. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-35-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1014" height="741" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/log-train.webp" alt="Log train on the Norfolk &amp; Southern’s Main Line bound for the John H. Roper Lumber Co.’s mill in Belhaven, N.C., ca. 1907. The trees, apparently from old-growth groves 8 miles north of Belhaven, are poplar, pine, and tupelo (black) gum. American Lumberman, April 27, 1907.

" class="wp-image-83330" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/log-train.webp 1014w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/log-train-400x292.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/log-train-200x146.webp 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/log-train-768x561.webp 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1014px) 100vw, 1014px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Log train on the Norfolk &amp; Southern’s Main Line bound for the John H. Roper Lumber Co.’s mill in Belhaven 1907. The trees, apparently from old-growth groves 8 miles north of Belhaven, are poplar, pine, and tupelo (black) gum. American Lumberman, April 27, 1907. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-36-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="788" height="591" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/logs-at-roper.webp" alt="The Atlantic white cedar (juniper) log pond at the John H. Roper’s cedar mill in Roper, N.C., ca. 1907. A log pond was a basic part of a lumber operation at that time. Workers would roll logs off train flatcars into a natural body of water or a reservoir created by damming a creek or river. (This is a branch of Kendrick Creek, which flows north into the Albemarle Sound.) Storing the logs in water helped remove dirt that might otherwise dull saws, lessened the risk of fire, and helped prevent wood from drying out and splitting before milling. Most importantly, the pond’s waters made it possible to move logs readily to the hoists that lifted them into the mill, not an easy thing in the days before internal combustion engines powered tractors.  Photo from American Lumberman, April 27, 1907.

" class="wp-image-83331" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/logs-at-roper.webp 788w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/logs-at-roper-400x300.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/logs-at-roper-200x150.webp 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/logs-at-roper-768x576.webp 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 788px) 100vw, 788px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The Atlantic white cedar (juniper) log pond at the John H. Roper’s cedar mill in Roper, N.C., ca. 1907. A log pond was a basic part of a lumber operation at that time. Workers would roll logs off train flatcars into a natural body of water or a reservoir created by damming a creek or river. (This is a branch of Kendrick Creek, which flows north into the Albemarle Sound.) Storing the logs in water helped remove dirt that might otherwise dull saws, lessened the risk of fire, and helped prevent wood from drying out and splitting before milling. Most importantly, the pond’s waters made it possible to move logs readily to the hoists that lifted them into the mill, not an easy thing in the days before internal combustion engines powered tractors. Photo from American Lumberman, April 27, 1907. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-37-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="507" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/lumber-barge.webp" alt="A lumber barge at the John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s wharf in the mill village of Scranton, on the east side of the Lower Pungo River.  As of 1907, the John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s fleet of vessels included 16 barges, 12 tugboats, three schooners, and a yacht. In addition to shipping lumber to northern seaports, the company also used local waterways to transport logs to its sawmills, sometimes on barges and other times by floating rafts of logs down a river or creek. Photo from American Lumberman, April 27, 1907.

" class="wp-image-83332" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/lumber-barge.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/lumber-barge-400x300.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/lumber-barge-200x150.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A lumber barge at the John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s wharf in the mill village of Scranton, on the east side of the Lower Pungo River. As of 1907, the John L. Roper Lumber Co.’s fleet of vessels included 16 barges, 12 tugboats, three schooners, and a yacht. In addition to shipping lumber to northern seaports, the company also used local waterways to transport logs to its sawmills, sometimes on barges and other times by floating rafts of logs down a river or creek. Photo from American Lumberman, April 27, 1907. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-38-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="513" height="731" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/shipping-news.webp" alt="I found this May 18, 1895 notice from the Virginian-Pilot in Bill Barber’s excellent new book, Timber, Land and Railroads: A History of the John L. Roper Lumber Company (2023). By listing shipments of North Carolina lumber that arrived in the port of Norfolk, Va. via the Albemarle &amp; Chesapeake Canal on a single day, this notice gives us a sense of the staggering amount of the state’s forests that was being shipped north in the late 19th century.  Bill Barber has also written a fascinating study of two of the most important lumber companies working in coastal forests just east of the East Dismal, in the vicinity of the Alligator River and the Scuppernong River. That study is called Tyrrell Timber: A History of the Branning Manufacturing Company and the Richmond Cedar Works (2021).

" class="wp-image-83333" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/shipping-news.webp 513w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/shipping-news-281x400.webp 281w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/shipping-news-140x200.webp 140w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 513px) 100vw, 513px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">I found this May 18, 1895 notice from the Virginian-Pilot in Bill Barber’s excellent new book, &#8220;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Timber-Land-Railroads-History-Company/dp/B0BZ6MNB9N" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Timber, Land and Railroads: A History of the John L. Roper Lumber Company</a>&#8221; (2023). By listing shipments of North Carolina lumber that arrived in the port of Norfolk, Va. via the Albemarle &amp; Chesapeake Canal on a single day, this notice gives us a sense of the staggering amount of the state’s forests that was being shipped north in the late 19th century.  Bill Barber has also written a fascinating study of two of the most important lumber companies working in coastal forests just east of the East Dismal, in the vicinity of the Alligator River and the Scuppernong River. That study is called <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Tyrrell-Timber-Branning-Manufacturing-Richmond/dp/B099C8QGWV/ref=sr_1_1?crid=VQHS6XTK0T9Q&amp;keywords=tyrrell+timber&amp;qid=1696959928&amp;s=books&amp;sprefix=tyrrell+timbe%2Cstripbooks%2C167&amp;sr=1-1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tyrrell Timber: A History of the Branning Manufacturing Company and the Richmond Cedar Works</a> (2021). </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-39-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="706" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/pinetown.webp" alt="Elizabeth Parker Roberts, Detail of map of Pinetown, N.C., 1918. Located 14 miles northwest of the Pungo River,  Pinetown had a unique identity among the region’s boom towns. In the early 1890s, the town grew up not around a sawmill but around Surry Parker’s logging machine shops. Parker, a former locomotive engineer with the Roanoke Railroad &amp; Lumber Co., was an inventive mechanical engineer. At Pinetown, he designed and built steam logging machinery with an emphasis on equipment that made logging remote wetlands such as the East Dismal more practical and profitable. Parker sold machinery to logging companies as far away as South America, but the East Dismal and the other swamplands around the Pungo River were his testing ground. Both the John L. Roper Lumber Co. and the Wilkinson brothers used his machinery extensively. In its heyday, Pinetown was home to 400-500 residents. As we can see on Ms. Robert’s map, the town had the company’s machine shops, several  stores,  3 churches, a school, a theater and, at Parker’s home, a lending library. Today the town’s boom years are long past. Pinetown is currently a small, unincorporated rural community of perhaps 150 residents. Map from Elizabeth Parker Roberts, Family and Friends: Pinetown, North Carolina, 1893-1918.

" class="wp-image-83334" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/pinetown.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/pinetown-383x400.webp 383w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/pinetown-192x200.webp 192w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Elizabeth Parker Roberts, Detail of map of Pinetown, N.C., 1918. Located 14 miles northwest of the Pungo River, Pinetown had a unique identity among the region’s boom towns. In the early 1890s, the town grew up not around a sawmill but around Surry Parker’s logging machine shops. Parker, a former locomotive engineer with the Roanoke Railroad &amp; Lumber Co., was an inventive mechanical engineer. At Pinetown, he designed and built steam logging machinery with an emphasis on equipment that made logging remote wetlands such as the East Dismal more practical and profitable. Parker sold machinery to logging companies as far away as South America, but the East Dismal and the other swamplands around the Pungo River were his testing ground. Both the John L. Roper Lumber Co. and the Wilkinson brothers used his machinery extensively. In its heyday, Pinetown was home to 400-500 residents. As we can see on Ms. Robert’s map, the town had the company’s machine shops, several  stores,  3 churches, a school, a theater and, at Parker’s home, a lending library. Today the town’s boom years are long past. Pinetown is currently a small, unincorporated rural community of perhaps 150 residents. Map from Elizabeth Parker Roberts, Family and Friends: Pinetown, North Carolina, 1893-1918. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-40-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="421" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/surry-parker.webp" alt="A logging crew on the western end of the East Dismal, May 1, 1897. Surry Parker is the man wearing a derby in the middle of the group. From Elizabeth Parker Roberts, Family and Friends: Pinetown, North Carolina, 1893-1918.

" class="wp-image-83335" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/surry-parker.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/surry-parker-400x249.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/surry-parker-200x125.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A logging crew on the western end of the East Dismal, May 1, 1897. Surry Parker is the man wearing a derby in the middle of the group. From Elizabeth Parker Roberts, Family and Friends: Pinetown, North Carolina, 1893-1918.

</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-41-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="328" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/skidding-tongs.webp" alt="Surry Parker’s machine works turned out a large variety of logging machinery and equipment, including these different size skidding tongs. Loggers attached them to logs so that a steam skidder could drag the logs from where they were cut to a rail line. Parker’s company also made excavating, dredging, and hoisting machinery. Source: Surry Parker, Steam Logging Machinery (Pine Town, N.C., 1912). Copy, North Carolina Collection, UNC Chapel Hill.

" class="wp-image-83336" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/skidding-tongs.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/skidding-tongs-400x194.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/skidding-tongs-200x97.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Surry Parker’s machine works turned out a large variety of logging machinery and equipment, including these different size skidding tongs. Loggers attached them to logs so that a steam skidder could drag the logs from where they were cut to a rail line. Parker’s company also made excavating, dredging, and hoisting machinery. Source: Surry Parker, Steam Logging Machinery (Pine Town, 1912). Copy, North Carolina Collection, UNC Chapel Hill. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-42-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="676" height="501" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/hyde-park.webp" alt="One of the more fanciful plans for draining the East Dismal and turning the land to agricultural production dates to 1870. This map shows the Southern Land Company’s vision of a development called “Hyde Park,” which was to include three villages and dozens of farms on the pocosin lands mostly south and east of Pungo Lake. Based in New York, the Southern Land Co. had purchased 90,000 acres of land with an eye to enticing settlers from northern states to settle there. A few settlers may have found a home along the Pungo Canal, the slave-dug, antebellum canal that runs between Pungo Lake and the Pungo River. Overall, though, Hyde Park was just a developer’s dream, at best. You can find the Southern Land Co.’s prospectus for recruiting settlers to Hyde Park here. Quite a few other land developments in the vicinity of the Pungo also came to naught; on the other hand, at least one, a farming community called Terra Ceia that had a core of Dutch immigrants, was more successful. This map of Hyde Park comes from the North Carolina Collection at UNC-Chapel Hill’s Wilson Library.

" class="wp-image-83337" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/hyde-park.webp 676w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/hyde-park-400x296.webp 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/hyde-park-200x148.webp 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">One of the more fanciful plans for draining the East Dismal and turning the land to agricultural production dates to 1870. This map shows the Southern Land Company’s vision of a development called “Hyde Park,” which was to include three villages and dozens of farms on the pocosin lands mostly south and east of Pungo Lake. Based in New York, the Southern Land Co. had purchased 90,000 acres of land with an eye to enticing settlers from northern states to settle there. A few settlers may have found a home along the Pungo Canal, the slave-dug, antebellum canal that runs between Pungo Lake and the Pungo River. Overall, though, Hyde Park was just a developer’s dream, at best. You can find the Southern Land Co.’s prospectus for recruiting settlers to Hyde Park <a href="https://digital.lib.ecu.edu/13420" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a>. Quite a few other land developments in the vicinity of the Pungo also came to naught; on the other hand, at least one, a farming community called <a href="https://www.ncpedia.org/listening-to-history/van-wyk-case-ellene" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Terra Ceia</a> that had a core of Dutch immigrants, was more successful. This map of Hyde Park comes from the <a href="https://web.lib.unc.edu/nc-maps/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">North Carolina Collection</a> at UNC-Chapel Hill’s Wilson Library. </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-43-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="569" height="436" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/white-city.jpg" alt="This is a last glimpse at a neighborhood called White City in the town of Plymouth, which is located on the Roanoke River, only a few miles north of the East Dismal (or as people there more often say, the” Big Swamp”). Built by the Wilts Veneer Co. ca. 1913, the neighborhood provided housing for many of the company’s African American mill workers and their families. Plymouth, the seat of Washington County, had been a small but important river port since the late 1700s, but became predominantly a lumber mill town in the early 20th century. Several mills, most notably the Wilts Veneer Co. (later the Chicago Mill &amp; Lumber Co.) and the National Handle Company, located there. Just in the first decade of the 20th century, the population of Plymouth doubled: from 1,011 to 2,165. The town’s lumber companies probably did their largest share of logging in the region’s more upland pinewoods and in the Roanoke River bottomlands, but were also a presence in the East Dismal. In the late 1930s, the arrival of the North Carolina Pulp Company (later Weyerhaeuser, now Domtar), completed the town’s transformation into a wood products town.  The New Jersey-based company drew thousands of workers to Plymouth from a large swath of North Carolina and many other states. This photograph is from the Sept. 12, 1973 edition of the Roanoke Beacon (Plymouth, N.C.) and accompanied an article describing the razing of the last houses in White City to make way for the construction of a public housing project. (A special thanks to Rosa Brown at the Washington County African American Museum and Cultural Center in Roper, N.C., for directing me to that article.)

" class="wp-image-83338" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/white-city.jpg 569w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/white-city-400x307.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/white-city-200x153.jpg 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 569px) 100vw, 569px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">This is a last glimpse at a neighborhood called White City in the town of Plymouth, which is located on the Roanoke River, only a few miles north of the East Dismal, or as people there more often say, the” Big Swamp.&#8221; Built by the Wilts Veneer Co. 1913, the neighborhood provided housing for many of the company’s African American mill workers and their families. Plymouth, the seat of Washington County, had been a small but important river port since the late 1700s, but became predominantly a lumber mill town in the early 20th century. Several mills, most notably the Wilts Veneer Co., later the Chicago Mill &amp; Lumber Co., and the National Handle Company, located there. Just in the first decade of the 20th century, the population of Plymouth doubled: from 1,011 to 2,165. The town’s lumber companies probably did their largest share of logging in the region’s more upland pinewoods and in the Roanoke River bottomlands, but were also a presence in the East Dismal. In the late 1930s, the arrival of the North Carolina Pulp Company (later Weyerhaeuser, now Domtar), completed the town’s transformation into a wood products town. The New Jersey-based company drew thousands of workers to Plymouth from a large swath of North Carolina and many other states. This photograph is from the Sept. 12, 1973, edition of the Roanoke Beacon (Plymouth) and accompanied an article describing the razing of the last houses in White City to make way for the construction of a public housing project. (A special thanks to Rosa Brown at the <a href="https://gowildnc.com/AfricanAmericanMuseum.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Washington County African American Museum and Cultural Center</a> in Roper, N.C., for directing me to that article.) </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">-44-</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="550" height="372" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/sunset-at-pocosin-lakes-nwr.jpg" alt="Sunset at Pungo Lake in the Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, Washington County, N.C. By 1990, forestry biologists judged that 97% of the East Dismal Swamp had not only been logged, but, after decades of drainage work and repeated burnings, converted into farmland or pine plantations. At the time of that study, the remaining 3% of the East Dismal’s forests were owned by lumber companies and were being actively drained and cut. If you go there today, it is hard to imagine that it was once the site of a vast and majestic swamp forest. It is also difficult, I think, to remember the thousands of men and women who found homes in the old lumber boomtowns along the Pungo and who toiled in its logging camps and mills. I dedicate this story to them, and to the memory of the great swamp. Photo courtesy, Roads End Naturalist

" class="wp-image-83339" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/sunset-at-pocosin-lakes-nwr.jpg 550w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/sunset-at-pocosin-lakes-nwr-400x271.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/sunset-at-pocosin-lakes-nwr-200x135.jpg 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Sunset at Pungo Lake in the <a href="https://www.fws.gov/refuge/pocosin-lakes" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge</a>, Washington County, N.C. By 1990, forestry biologists judged that 97% of the East Dismal Swamp had not only been logged, but, after decades of drainage work and repeated burnings, converted into farmland or pine plantations. At the time of that study, the remaining 3% of the East Dismal’s forests were owned by lumber companies and were being actively drained and cut. If you go there today, it is hard to imagine that it was once the site of a vast and majestic swamp forest. It is also difficult, I think, to remember the thousands of men and women who found homes in the old lumber boomtowns along the Pungo and who toiled in its logging camps and mills. I dedicate this story to them, and to the memory of the great swamp. Photo courtesy, <a href="https://roadsendnaturalist.com/2013/04/22/a-spring-trip-to-pungo/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Roads End Naturalist</a> </figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p class="has-text-align-center">***</p>



<p><em>Cecelski shares on his&nbsp;<a href="https://davidcecelski.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">website</a>&nbsp;essays and lectures he has written about the state’s coast as well as brings readers along on his search&nbsp;for the lost stories of our coastal past in the museums, libraries and archives he visits in the U.S. and across the globe.&nbsp;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pamlico Sound ferries on altered schedule due to shoaling</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2022/11/pamlico-sound-ferries-on-altered-schedule-due-to-shoaling/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCDOT Ferry Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outer Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coastalreview.org/?p=74032</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="514" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-768x514.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-768x514.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-400x268.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-1024x685.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-200x134.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-1536x1028.jpg 1536w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-2048x1371.jpg 2048w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-968x648.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-636x426.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-320x214.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-239x160.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />The Ferry Division is running an alternate schedule between Cedar Island, Swan Quarter and Ocracoke due to critical shoaling issues in the ferry channel near Ocracoke.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="514" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-768x514.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-768x514.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-400x268.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-1024x685.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-200x134.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-1536x1028.jpg 1536w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-2048x1371.jpg 2048w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-968x648.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-636x426.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-320x214.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-239x160.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /><div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-medium"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="400" height="268" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-400x268.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-51904" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-400x268.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-1024x685.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-200x134.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-768x514.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-1536x1028.jpg 1536w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-2048x1371.jpg 2048w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-600x400.jpg 600w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-968x648.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-636x426.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-320x214.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OcracokeFlight-233-239x160.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /><figcaption>The North Carolina Department of Transportation ferry Croatoan gets underway from Hatteras Island to Ocracoke. Photo: Mark Hibbs</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<p>Ferries taking passengers between Cedar Island, Swan Quarter and Ocracoke are on an alternate schedule as of Monday due to critical shoaling issues in the ferry channel just outside of Ocracoke’s Silver Lake Harbor.</p>



<p>The North Carolina Department of Transportation’s Ferry Division announced Monday the following schedule change:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Ocracoke to Cedar Island: 7:30 a.m., 1 p.m.</li><li>Cedar Island to Ocracoke: 10:30 a.m., 4:30 p.m.</li><li>Ocracoke to Swan Quarter: 7 a.m., 1:30 p.m.</li><li>​​​Swan Quarter to Ocracoke: 10 a.m., 4:30 p.m.</li></ul>



<p>The Army Corps of Engineers’ contractor Cottrell Dredging is to use the Dredge Lexington in the Bigfoot Slough channel to clear the shoaling, but dredging operations are dependent on weather and tides. </p>



<p>Once water depths in the ferry channel return to acceptable levels, the Ferry Division plans to resume its regular schedule on both routes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pamlico Sound oyster sanctuary network continues to grow</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2022/08/pamlico-sound-oyster-sanctuary-network-continues-to-grow/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer Allen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2022 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Habitat Restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisheries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water quality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coastalreview.org/?p=70913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="527" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/stevens-towing-cedar-island-sanctuary-July-26-768x527.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/stevens-towing-cedar-island-sanctuary-July-26-768x527.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/stevens-towing-cedar-island-sanctuary-July-26-400x275.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/stevens-towing-cedar-island-sanctuary-July-26-200x137.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/stevens-towing-cedar-island-sanctuary-July-26.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />With the current project to build an oyster sanctuary near Cedar Island, the Division of Marine Fisheries is getting closer to its goal of 500 acres of protected oyster reefs in Pamlico Sound by 2026.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="527" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/stevens-towing-cedar-island-sanctuary-July-26-768x527.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/stevens-towing-cedar-island-sanctuary-July-26-768x527.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/stevens-towing-cedar-island-sanctuary-July-26-400x275.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/stevens-towing-cedar-island-sanctuary-July-26-200x137.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/stevens-towing-cedar-island-sanctuary-July-26.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />
<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1200" height="824" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/stevens-towing-cedar-island-sanctuary-July-26.jpg" alt="Excavators deploy limestone marl and concrete into the Pamlico Sound Tuesday to build the Cedar Island Oyster Sanctuary. Photo: Jennifer Allen" class="wp-image-70915" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/stevens-towing-cedar-island-sanctuary-July-26.jpg 1200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/stevens-towing-cedar-island-sanctuary-July-26-400x275.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/stevens-towing-cedar-island-sanctuary-July-26-200x137.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/stevens-towing-cedar-island-sanctuary-July-26-768x527.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /><figcaption>Excavators deploy limestone marl and concrete into the Pamlico Sound Tuesday to build the Cedar Island Oyster Sanctuary. Photo: Jennifer Allen</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>In Pamlico Sound early Tuesday afternoon, near Cedar Island National Wildlife Refuge in Down East Carteret County, two excavators at each end of a barge strategically placed the day’s load of 700 tons of limestone marl and crushed concrete into the water.</p>



<p>They are building the new Cedar Island Oyster Sanctuary. The three-phase project, currently in phase 2, is the most recent for the North Carolina Coastal Federation and the state Division of Marine Fisheries to build up the oyster population in Pamlico Sound. The Coastal Federation publishes Coastal Review.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The nonprofit organization and the state agency, along with contractor Stevens Towing, which has an office in North Carolina, have partnered since 2009 to build about 110 acres of oyster sanctuaries, which are large-scale oyster restoration reefs that provide oyster larvae that reseed the wild population and cultch-planted areas.</p>



<p>A handful of division officials, federation staff, members of the media and Sen. Norm Sanderson, R-Pamlico, rode out Tuesday to the Cedar Island Oyster Sanctuary construction site to see how the material is deployed to create what looks like ridges underwater for oysters to grow on and spawn.</p>



<p>This was the first trip for Sanderson to see how the sanctuaries are built.</p>



<p>“It’s pretty awesome,” he told Coastal Review on the ride back to South River, “to be that close and see how simple it is but how affective it is.”&nbsp;</p>



<p>He said initiatives like the oyster sanctuaries are important to him because he has a heart for commercial fishermen, and always has.&nbsp;</p>



<p>“I know that they’re in a bad place right now, and I don&#8217;t see this industry as something that can save them, but we can help give them options,” he said, adding this work benefits not only the fishing industry, but also the environment and the state’s economy and tourism. “There&#8217;s just a lot of positives about it.”</p>



<p>Expected to be about 75 acres once complete, the Cedar Island sanctuary is the newest in the Sen. Jean Preston Oyster Sanctuary Network in Pamlico Sound.</p>



<p>Now in its fourth edition, the “<a href="https://www.nccoast.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Oyster-Blueprint-2021-2025-FINAL-web.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Oyster Restoration and Protection Plan for North Carolina: A Blueprint for Action</a>,” which details strategies for oyster protection, restoration, harvest and education, set a goal in 2008 for 500 acres of protected sanctuary by 2025 in the network named after the senator from Carteret County who died in 2013. To date, there are 15 sanctuaries, according to the division, with Cedar Island being the newest and will contribute to the 500-acre goal. </p>



<p>The division’s sanctuary biologist, Bennett Paradis, told the group on the way to the site that division staff had been busy all summer checking progress.&nbsp;A crew dives the sanctuaries and brings material up to the boat. Then, they count and measure oyster density to get an idea of what the population structure looks like. The larger oysters are older, and if there&#8217;s a lot of larger oysters, then he said they know it’s a thriving population.</p>



<p>Erin Fleckenstein, coastal scientist with the Coastal Federation, said during the trip out to the site that researchers have found that the oyster sanctuaries are successful. The sanctuaries make up 6% of all the potential oyster reef in Pamlico Sound and contribute 20% of the population. “It&#8217;s only a 6% footprint, but it&#8217;s 20% of the whole population, and then they&#8217;re contributing 25% of all the oyster babies that are floating around in the sound.”</p>



<p>Federation Executive Director Todd Miller told Coastal Review that the science shows that the sanctuary plays a vital role in sustaining healthy oyster populations in the sound and the coastal economy.</p>



<p>“This large construction project employs local marine contractors, barge operators, truck drivers, boat crews, and rock miners — and is an important economic driver in eastern North Carolina both during construction but also in sustaining our marine fisheries and tourism economies,” Miller said, adding that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association and the North Carolina General Assembly support the project.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Jordan Byrum is the division’s artificial reef program coordinator who oversees the oyster sanctuary program.</p>



<p>He said during a brief presentation while heading to the sanctuary site that earlier this year, 18,000 tons of rock was stockpiled at the division’s South River site and about a third of it is left to be deployed for this phase. There have been between 20 and 25 deployments so far this year.&nbsp;</p>



<p>About 20 acres of the Cedar Island sanctuary were completed last summer during the first phase. For Phase 2 this year, contractors have been moving material since spring from a division site in South River to the sanctuary. The same progress is expected this year, around 20 acres, totaling around 40 to 45 acres completed.&nbsp;He said that he expects the Cedar Island sanctuary to take another year or year and a half to be complete.</p>



<p>“We should wrap up year two at Cedar Island in a couple more weeks,” Byrum said in a follow-up email Friday. “That will bring us up to about 320 acres of habitat in oyster sanctuaries.”</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1200" height="900" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/DMF-presentation-bennett-jordan-jacob-kathy.jpg" alt="From left, Bennett Paradis, Jordan Byrum and Jacob Boyd with the Division of Marine Fisheries join Division Director Kathy Rawls to give a brief presentation Tuesday about the Cedar Island Oyster Sanctuary now under construction. Photo: Jennifer Allen" class="wp-image-70916" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/DMF-presentation-bennett-jordan-jacob-kathy.jpg 1200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/DMF-presentation-bennett-jordan-jacob-kathy-400x300.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/DMF-presentation-bennett-jordan-jacob-kathy-200x150.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/DMF-presentation-bennett-jordan-jacob-kathy-768x576.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /><figcaption>From left, Bennett Paradis, Jordan Byrum and Jacob Boyd with the Division of Marine Fisheries join Division Director Kathy Rawls to give a brief presentation Tuesday about the Cedar Island Oyster Sanctuary now under construction. Photo: Jennifer Allen</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>All the limestone marl and granite for this project was purchased from North Carolina companies, Byrum said. The material is trucked to staging sites by a Vanceboro towing company, including the site in South River where Stevens Towing collects material for the Cedar Island sanctuary.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Byrum explained to the group Tuesday that the Coastal Federation had applied for a NOAA grant that would help meet the goal of 500 acres of protected oyster sanctuary in Pamlico Sound. “We&#8217;ve put together a plan to basically create two new sanctuaries,” he said, as well as finish out some of the undeveloped areas on a handful of other sanctuaries, with the ultimate goal to meet the 500 acres of oyster sanctuary.</p>



<p>After next year, then three more years of construction, they’ll meet the 500 acres of sanctuary goal, Byrum said.</p>



<p>To put that in perspective, he said, this year 18,000 tons of rock was used. Over the next three years, the plan is to use about 60,000 tons each year, for a total of 180,000.</p>



<p>NOAA began supporting the Coastal Federation’s large-scale oyster sanctuary work in 2009 with a $5 million American Recovery and Reinvestment Act grant and has provided more than $12 million since for oyster restoration efforts in the state, Christine Van Dyck, federation assistant director, told Coastal Review.</p>



<p>The federal agency also contributed funding to the North Carolina Oyster Blueprint, monitoring by N.C. State University&#8217;s Center for Marine Sciences and Technology, or CMAST, and adaptive management by the project team of the federation, Division of Marine Fisheries, the contractors and the researchers, Van Dyck said.</p>



<p>“We are currently on year two of our most recent NOAA partnership, and are applying to their Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grants this fall,“ in partnership with the division and CMAST for $15 million to complete the 500-acre Jean Preston Oyster Sanctuary in Pamlico Sound, Van Dyck said.&nbsp;</p>



<p>The state has provided millions in matching funds through the partnership, she added.&nbsp;</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<div class="epyt-video-wrapper"><div  id="_ytid_54472"  width="800" height="450"  data-origwidth="800" data-origheight="450"  data-relstop="1" data-facadesrc="https://www.youtube.com/embed/9cT5RXtMblQ?enablejsapi=1&#038;origin=https://coastalreview.org&#038;autoplay=0&#038;cc_load_policy=0&#038;cc_lang_pref=&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;loop=0&#038;rel=0&#038;fs=1&#038;playsinline=0&#038;autohide=2&#038;theme=dark&#038;color=red&#038;controls=1&#038;disablekb=0&#038;" class="__youtube_prefs__ epyt-facade epyt-is-override  no-lazyload" data-epautoplay="1" ><img decoding="async" data-spai-excluded="true" class="epyt-facade-poster skip-lazy" loading="lazy"  alt="YouTube player"  src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/9cT5RXtMblQ/maxresdefault.jpg"  /><button class="epyt-facade-play" aria-label="Play"><svg data-no-lazy="1" height="100%" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 68 48" width="100%"><path class="ytp-large-play-button-bg" d="M66.52,7.74c-0.78-2.93-2.49-5.41-5.42-6.19C55.79,.13,34,0,34,0S12.21,.13,6.9,1.55 C3.97,2.33,2.27,4.81,1.48,7.74C0.06,13.05,0,24,0,24s0.06,10.95,1.48,16.26c0.78,2.93,2.49,5.41,5.42,6.19 C12.21,47.87,34,48,34,48s21.79-0.13,27.1-1.55c2.93-0.78,4.64-3.26,5.42-6.19C67.94,34.95,68,24,68,24S67.94,13.05,66.52,7.74z" fill="#f00"></path><path d="M 45,24 27,14 27,34" fill="#fff"></path></svg></button></div></div>
</div><figcaption>Stevens Towing deploys material July 22 to build the Cedar Island Oyster Sanctuary in the Pamlico Sound.</figcaption></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pamlico Sound ferries resume full summer schedules</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2022/07/pamlico-sound-ferries-resume-full-summer-schedules/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 15:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stateline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCDOT Ferry Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coastalreview.org/?p=70035</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="719" height="420" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt.jpg 719w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt-400x234.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt-200x117.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt-636x372.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt-320x187.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt-239x140.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 719px) 100vw, 719px" />Ferries to and from Ocracoke from Cedar Island and Swan Quarter have resumed regular summer schedules.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="719" height="420" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt.jpg 719w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt-400x234.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt-200x117.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt-636x372.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt-320x187.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt-239x140.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 719px) 100vw, 719px" />
<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-full is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-49455" width="702" height="410" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt.jpg 719w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt-400x234.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt-200x117.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt-636x372.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt-320x187.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-dredge-Merritt-239x140.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 702px) 100vw, 702px" /><figcaption>The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers&#8217; dredge Merritt works in 2020 in the Big Foot Slough area of the Pamlico Sound just outside of Ocracoke. Photo: Peter Vankevich </figcaption></figure></div>



<p>After several weeks of adjusted schedules and a dredge project just outside the Ocracoke-Silver Lake Terminal to alleviate shoaling, ferries that cross the Pamlico Sound to Ocracoke resumed full summer schedules Friday. </p>



<p>The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’&nbsp;dredge Merritt&nbsp;began work June 17 in Bigfoot Slough. Shoaling in that area made the ferry channel too shallow to safely operate the division&#8217;s largest vessels. The dredge project took about two weeks, state Department of Transportation&#8217;s Ferry Division officials said.</p>



<p>The following is the full summer schedule:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Cedar Island-Ocracoke:&nbsp;8 a.m., 10 a.m., 1 p.m. and 4:30 p.m.</li><li>Ocracoke-Cedar Island:&nbsp;7:30 a.m., 10 a.m., 1 p.m. and 5:30 p.m.</li><li>Swan Quarter-Ocracoke:&nbsp;7 a.m., 10 a.m., 2 p.m. and 4:30 p.m.</li><li>Ocracoke-Swan Quarter:&nbsp;7 a.m., 11 a.m., 12:45 p.m. and 3:45 p.m.</li></ul>



<p>​Officials highly recommended travelers make reservations during the busy summer season either online at&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ncferry.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.ncferry.org</a>, or by phone at 1-800-BY-FERRY.</p>



<p>Real-time updates on weather or mechanical delays on the Cedar Island and Swan Quarter routes can be found on the Twitter feed&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/NCFerryPamSound" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@NCFerryPamSound</a>.</p>



<p>The North Carolina Department of Transportation&#8217;s Ferry Division oversees the ferry system&#8217;s seven routes and 21 ferries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>High winds force Pamlico Sound ferry runs to be canceled</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2021/11/high-winds-force-pamlico-sound-ferry-runs-to-be-canceled/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2021 16:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCDOT Ferry Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coastalreview.org/?p=62203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="513" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-768x513.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-768x513.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-400x267.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-1280x855.jpg 1280w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-200x134.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-1536x1026.jpg 1536w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-2048x1368.jpg 2048w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-600x400.jpg 600w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-1024x684.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-968x647.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-636x425.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-320x214.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-239x160.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />Other state ferry schedules could be affected this weekend because of an expected strong storm with heavy rain and winds.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="513" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-768x513.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-768x513.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-400x267.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-1280x855.jpg 1280w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-200x134.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-1536x1026.jpg 1536w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-2048x1368.jpg 2048w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-600x400.jpg 600w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-1024x684.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-968x647.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-636x425.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-320x214.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-239x160.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />
<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1280" height="855" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-1280x855.jpg" alt="NCDOT has canceled departures Friday to Ocracoke from Cedar Island and Swan Quarter due to high winds." class="wp-image-49188" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-1280x855.jpg 1280w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-400x267.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-200x134.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-768x513.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-1536x1026.jpg 1536w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-2048x1368.jpg 2048w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-600x400.jpg 600w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-1024x684.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-968x647.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-636x425.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-320x214.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Cedar-Island-terminal-239x160.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px" /><figcaption>Passengers wait to load the ferry at the Cedar Island Ferry Terminal. Cedar Island and Swan Quarter departures to Ocracoke have been canceled for Friday due to high winds. Photo: Jennifer Allen</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Weather packing wind gusts up to 30 mph has made travel unsafe in the Pamlico Sound, forcing North Carolina Department of Transportation to cancel ferry departures on Friday to Ocracoke Island from Swan Quarter and Cedar Island. </p>



<p>In addition, state ferry schedules could change this weekend due to a strong storm with heavy rain and winds that is forecast for eastern North Carolina, NCDOT officials said Friday.</p>



<p>The following departures between Ocracoke and Swan Quarter and Ocracoke and Cedar Island have been canceled for Friday:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Ocracoke-Swan Quarter: 10 a.m., 1:30 p.m., 4:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m.</li><li>Ocracoke-Cedar Island: 4 p.m. and 4:30 p.m.</li></ul>



<p>Ferry schedules will resume when it&#8217;s safe to do so.</p>



<p>Travelers wishing to use a ferry should stay tuned to&nbsp;<a href="https://u7061146.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=4tNED-2FM8iDZJQyQ53jATUR337CCEUWr7mMImZc-2BzLWkn3io38amP1yMgid-2BBSuI92QXb_jrUqf5zwH7FzSx1F7hMR7-2FjQNZm1ybgIkK8nT6npAYADwq5MGPfk6e8i0wkeSvdpPTOtPOjMW6rnR3a8XA3NoSbJ3tYil24xvCBQu-2B2H1qUzVLNTT8QdcP8BUGMJU0uMgjuW6prbVoG3riicPpQYWIjvZoVlvIdXx8zv46nPqF43dB3QKdhGbCRJBQMiPoLZ3uQRsks72X1c-2BGttFIiA5kgBpTcqscSeLs-2FrDl1HWPdIBw3mHDGSfcxRXQfGyoW-2FMxa6vheYKgfsFdtVcW6GOQql56aj22a8Hoe-2Bo8UVjmuaktF-2Bgz30YrFOG9IHjysuhpFJYFAUp3EPoBAVDZTtM1sV2nZhbfuk2FendKt7YGw-3D" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NCDOT on social media</a>&nbsp;for updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pamlico Sound Ferries Resume Full Schedule</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2021/04/pamlico-sound-ferries-resume-full-schedule/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCDOT Ferry Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coastalreview.org/?p=54502</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="497" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-768x497.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-768x497.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-400x259.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-1024x663.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-200x129.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-1536x994.jpg 1536w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-968x626.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-636x411.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-320x207.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-239x155.jpg 239w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE.jpg 2000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />NCDOT's Ferry Division has resumed its full schedule for Pamlico Sound routes connecting Ocracoke to Cedar Island and Swan Quarter.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="497" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-768x497.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-768x497.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-400x259.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-1024x663.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-200x129.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-1536x994.jpg 1536w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-968x626.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-636x411.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-320x207.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE-239x155.jpg 239w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/DR-NC-FERRY-OCRACOKE.jpg 2000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /><p><figure id="attachment_53814" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-53814" style="width: 2560px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-53814 size-full" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Murden-IMG_99371-scaled.jpg" alt="" width="2560" height="1328" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-53814" class="wp-caption-text">The Army Corps of Engineers’ Dredge Murden off Ocracoke. Photo: P. Vankevich/Ocracoke Observer</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>Pamlico Sound ferry routes between the mainland and Ocracoke returned to a full schedule Wednesday after being reduced to two runs for most of this month because of shoaling in the ferry channel outside Ocracoke Harbor.</p>
<p>A test run with the M/V Swan Quarter Tuesday showed that the Army Corps of Engineers’ dredging efforts opened ferry channel depths and widths in Bigfoot Slough, allowing safe passage for all of the state’s ferries, officials with the N.C. Department of Transportation’s Ferry Division said Tuesday.</p>
<div>The following is the full schedule beginning Wednesday:</div>
<div>
<ul>
<li>Ocracoke to Cedar Island:  7:30 a.m., 1 p.m. and 4:30 p.m.</li>
<li>Cedar Island to Ocracoke: 7:30 a.m., 10:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.</li>
<li>Ocracoke to Swan Quarter: 7 a.m., 10 a.m. and 1:30 p.m.</li>
<li>Swan Quarter to Ocracoke: 10 a.m., 1:30 p.m. and 4:30 p.m.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>For up-to-the-minute information on schedule changes on the Cedar Island and Swan Quarter routes, please follow <a href="https://twitter.com/NCFerryPamSound" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">@NCFerryPamSound​</a> on Twitter.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pamlico Sound Ferries on Adjusted Schedule</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2021/04/pamlico-sound-ferries-on-adjusted-schedule/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 16:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCDOT Ferry Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coastalreview.org/?p=54401</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="506" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-768x506.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-768x506.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-400x264.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-1280x844.jpg 1280w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-200x132.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-1536x1012.jpg 1536w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-2048x1350.jpg 2048w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-1024x675.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-968x638.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-636x419.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-320x211.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-239x158.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />NCDOT's Ferry Division is extending the alternate schedule on Pamlico Sound between Cedar Island, Swan Quarter and Ocracoke through Monday.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="506" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-768x506.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-768x506.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-400x264.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-1280x844.jpg 1280w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-200x132.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-1536x1012.jpg 1536w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-2048x1350.jpg 2048w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-1024x675.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-968x638.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-636x419.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-320x211.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cedar-island-ferry-rest-area-239x158.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /><p><figure id="attachment_27976" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-27976" style="width: 1325px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-27976" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry.png" alt="" width="1325" height="668" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry.png 1325w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-400x202.png 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-1280x645.png 1280w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-200x101.png 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-768x387.png 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-1024x516.png 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1325px) 100vw, 1325px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-27976" class="wp-caption-text">A state ferry arrives at the Swan Quarter dock. Photo: N.C. Ferry Division</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>Ferries between the mainland and Ocracoke will continue to run on a reduced schedule until Monday.</p>
<p>The North Carolina Department of Transportation’s Ferry Division extended the altered schedule on Pamlico Sound between Cedar Island, Swan Quarter and Ocracoke through Monday while the Army Corps of Engineers continues 24-hour dredging to combat shoaling issues in the ferry channel just outside Ocracoke’s Silver Lake Harbor.</p>
<div>The following schedule is in place until Monday, weather permitting:</div>
<div>
<ul>
<li>Ocracoke to Cedar Island:  7:30 a.m., 1 p.m.</li>
<li>Cedar Island to Ocracoke: 10:30 a.m., 4:30 p.m.</li>
<li>Ocracoke to Swan Quarter: 7 a.m., 1:30 p.m.</li>
<li>Swan Quarter to Ocracoke: 10 a.m., 4:30 p.m.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>Shoaling occurs when sand and sediment fill into a ferry channel, making water depths too shallow and the channel too narrow for safe operation of the ferry system’s largest vessels.</p>
<p>The Corps has two dredges, Murden and Merritt, working together in Bigfoot Slough channel to perform 24-hour dredging. On Monday, the Ferry Division will make a test run in the channel with its largest vessel, the M/V Swan Quarter. If water depths and channel widths are at acceptable levels, the ferry division will resume its regular schedule on both routes Tuesday, according to NCDOT.</p>
<p align="left">The schedule was first reduced from three to two ferry runs per day March 26 and again April 1, then April 5. The ferry was suspended completely from April 8 to April 12, all due to shoaling in the ferry channel just outside of Ocracoke’s Silver Lake Harbor. Two ferry runs resumed April 13.</p>
<p>For up-to-the-minute information on schedule changes on the Cedar Island and Swan Quarter routes, please follow <a href="https://twitter.com/NCFerryPamSound">@NCFerryPamSound​</a> on Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pamlico Sound Ferries Back to 2 Trips a Day</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2020/08/pamlico-sound-ferries-back-to-2-trips-a-day/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCDOT Ferry Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coastalreview.org/?p=48458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="387" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-768x387.png" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-768x387.png 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-400x202.png 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-1280x645.png 1280w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-200x101.png 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-1024x516.png 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry.png 1325w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />With the return of M/V Silver Lake to Ocracoke, ferry routes taking passengers to and from Ocracoke from both Swan Quarter and Cedar Island returned Sunday to two-boat schedules.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="387" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-768x387.png" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-768x387.png 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-400x202.png 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-1280x645.png 1280w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-200x101.png 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-1024x516.png 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry.png 1325w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /><p><figure id="attachment_27976" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-27976" style="width: 1325px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-27976" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry.png" alt="" width="1325" height="668" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry.png 1325w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-400x202.png 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-1280x645.png 1280w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-200x101.png 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-768x387.png 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/State-ferry-1024x516.png 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1325px) 100vw, 1325px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-27976" class="wp-caption-text">A state ferry arrives at the Swan Quarter dock. Photo: N.C. Ferry Division</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>With the return of the M/V Silver Lake from its required dry dock period, the North Carolina Ferry Division was able to resume Sunday a two-boat schedule on its routes between Cedar Island, Ocracoke and Swan Quarter.</p>
<div>The following is the schedule that will remain in place until further notice:</div>
<div>
<ul>
<li>Ocracoke to Cedar Island: 7:30 a.m., 1 p.m.</li>
<li>Cedar Island to Ocracoke: 10:30 a.m., 4:30 p.m.</li>
<li>Ocracoke to Swan Quarter: 7:00 a.m., 1:30 p.m.</li>
<li>Swan Quarter to Ocracoke: 10 a.m., 4:30 p.m.</li>
</ul>
<p>Passengers can reserve space on these departures online at <a href="https://www.ncdot.gov/travel-maps/ferry-tickets-services/Pages/default.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">www.ncferry.org</a>, or by calling 1-800-BY FERRY.​</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ferry Trips Across Pamlico Sound Reduced</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2020/07/ferry-trips-across-pamlico-sound-reduced/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCDOT Ferry Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coastalreview.org/?p=47835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="426" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-768x426.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-768x426.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-e1522951324677-400x222.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-e1522951324677-200x111.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-e1522951324677.jpg 720w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-968x536.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-636x352.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-320x177.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-239x132.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />Because of shoaling issues in the ferry channel outside of Ocracoke's Silver Lake Harbor, daily service will be reduced by one trip each way between Ocracoke and both Cedar Island and Swan Quarter until further notice.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="426" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-768x426.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-768x426.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-e1522951324677-400x222.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-e1522951324677-200x111.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-e1522951324677.jpg 720w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-968x536.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-636x352.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-320x177.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-239x132.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /><p><figure id="attachment_28042" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-28042" style="width: 720px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-28042 size-full" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-e1522951324677.jpg" alt="" width="720" height="399" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-e1522951324677.jpg 720w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-e1522951324677-400x222.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/O-Harbor2-Dec-2017-CL-e1522951324677-200x111.jpg 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-28042" class="wp-caption-text">&#8220;Slick cam&#8221; on Ocracoke’s Silver Lake harbor. Photo: C. Leinbach/Ocracoke Observer</figcaption></figure></p>
<p align="left"><span id="m_665534575338700319">Because of shoaling issues in the ferry channel outside of Ocracoke&#8217;s Silver Lake Harbor, daily service will be reduced by one trip each way on the Pamlico Sound between Ocracoke and both Cedar Island and Swan Quarter until further notice.</span></p>
<p align="left">The state Department of Transportation’s Ferry Division announced Wednesday the following schedule that will start Thursday:</p>
<ul>
<li>Cedar Island to Ocracoke: 10:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.</li>
<li>Ocracoke to Cedar Island:  7:30 a.m. and 1 p.m.</li>
<li>Swan Quarter to Ocracoke:  10 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.</li>
<li>Ocracoke to Swan Quarter:  7 a.m. and 1:30 p.m.</li>
</ul>
<p>Reservation holders whose trips are affected by the change will be notified by email or phone.</p>
<p>The latest survey by the Army Corps of Engineers shows water depths in Bigfoot Slough near Ocracoke as low as 8 feet, which means the ferry system’s two largest sound-class vessels, the Swan Quarter and the Sea Level, cannot cross the area safely.</p>
<p>The ferry channel in Bigfoot Slough is a federally maintained channel, meaning that any dredging that occurs must be performed by the Army Corps of Engineers. The Ferry Division has notified the Corps of the critical need for dredging in the area, according to NCDOT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mapping Pamlico Sound: The Secotan Site</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2020/07/mapping-pamlico-sound-the-secotan-site/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Duffus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 04:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture & History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture and history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coastalreview.org/?p=47482</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="521" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-768x521.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-768x521.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-400x271.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-200x136.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-1024x695.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-968x657.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-636x432.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-320x217.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-239x162.jpg 239w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail.jpg 1105w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />In our continuing series on the July 1585 circumnavigation of Pamlico Sound, historian Kevin Duffus shares his evidence pointing to the Native American village of Secotan's location.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="521" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-768x521.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-768x521.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-400x271.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-200x136.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-1024x695.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-968x657.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-636x432.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-320x217.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail-239x162.jpg 239w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/White-Secotan-detail.jpg 1105w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /><p><figure id="attachment_47465" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47465" style="width: 1270px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1.-HydeCounty-detail.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-47465" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1.-HydeCounty-detail.jpg" alt="" width="1270" height="715" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1.-HydeCounty-detail.jpg 1270w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1.-HydeCounty-detail-400x225.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1.-HydeCounty-detail-1024x577.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1.-HydeCounty-detail-200x113.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1.-HydeCounty-detail-768x432.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1.-HydeCounty-detail-968x545.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1.-HydeCounty-detail-636x358.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1.-HydeCounty-detail-482x271.jpg 482w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1.-HydeCounty-detail-320x180.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1.-HydeCounty-detail-239x135.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1270px) 100vw, 1270px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47465" class="wp-caption-text">Detail of &#8220;La Virginea Pars&#8221; showing locations of recognizable geographic features of Hyde County shoreline. Author-submitted artwork.</figcaption></figure></p>
<p><em>Coastal Review Online is featuring the research, findings and commentary of author Kevin Duffus</em><i>.</i></p>
<p><em>Second of three parts</em></p>
<p>It happened about 10 weeks before the second of Walter Raleigh’s three expeditions to establish an English colony on the North American continent arrived at Ocracoke Inlet in 1585. The expedition of seven ships was led by Raleigh’s cousin, 43-year-old<strong> </strong>Sir Richard Grenville aboard his flagship Tiger.</p>
<p>In the middle of the afternoon on April 19 in the Algonquian towns along the Pamlico, the sky grew dark, birds and beasts became eerily silent, and people trembled in fear. A rare hybrid solar eclipse was spreading across North America. The 25-year-old mathematician, expedition scientist, ethnographer and Algonquian translator Thomas Harriot was later told by the Native Americans that the eclipse “unto them appeared very terrible.” The event seemed to portend an ominous sign.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">———</p>
<p>Describing the next leg of the exploration of Pamlico Sound after visiting Pomeiooc the journal of the flagship Tiger was succinct: “The 13. (July 13) we passed by water to Aquascogoc.” More than that surely transpired.</p>
<p>The Algonquian town of Aquascogoc, according to the map “La Virginea Pars” by expedition surveyor and artist John White, was located on the east bank of today’s Pungo Creek, a few miles north of Belhaven. The distance from Pomeiooc to Aquascogoc was roughly 50 miles, a lengthy trip in small boats that likely took two days to travel.</p>
<p><div class="article-sidebar-left"><a href="https://coastalreview.org/2020/07/crossing-the-threshold-of-history/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Read Part 1: The 1585 Circumnavigation of Pamlico Sound</a> </div></p>
<p>As the motley Elizabethan flotilla of Grenville’s London ferry boat, future governor of the Roanoke Island colony Ralph Lane’s Puerto Rican pinnace and the two ships&#8217; boats were rowed or sailed westward, White, Harriot and their assistants began constantly taking soundings and bearings, estimating distances and noting the locations of points of land, bays and islands, and carefully converting the data to sectional sheets or small maps even while the boats pitched and rolled on gentle swells.</p>
<p>It was imperative that the surveyors maintain a constant proportion or scale — not a simple task while underway using 16th century technology. Keeping the paper dry was another challenge and periodic rain showers may have prevented some parts of the shoreline to be accurately recorded. But White’s watercolor rendering of the southern shoreline of today’s Hyde County reflects his best work.</p>
<p>We are able to recognize nearly all of the prominent geographic features the Elizabethans observed 435 years ago. The shape of Long Point appears as the first prominent peninsula passed by the explorers after weighing anchor in Far Creek and rounding Gibbs Shoal.</p>
<p>Wysocking Bay is likely the next major geographic feature they passed and White’s map matches well with today’s charts of the bay framed on the northeast and southwest by Long Point and Benson’s Point. Continuing their southwestward journey, the next prominent feature is Bluff Point. South of the point on White’s map is what seems to be a large island or peninsula connected to the mainland by a narrow isthmus.</p>
<p>This is where we encounter what was once a mystery—what lay beneath a small patch of similarly made paper and color palette fixed onto the final “La Virginea Pars” map, presumably by White. The reason for the patch had escaped the scrutiny of the greatest Roanoke Voyages scholars until eight years ago.</p>
<p>This writer had something to do with the discovery when his initial discussions with members of the First Colony Foundation regarding the accuracy of White’s map and its positions of Algonquian towns along the Pamlico eventually led them to contact experts at the British Museum. By examining the map using noninvasive infrared radiation, scientific conservators and curators in London were able to peer beneath the patch and see White’s initial graphite line drawing.</p>
<p>At the time, the greatest public interest (bordering on near hysteria) concerned a second patch that appeared to cover the symbol of a fort and potentially the destination and resettlement of the Lost Colony at the western end of Albemarle Sound. That is not our interest here; ours is why White’s painted patch depicted Bluff Point as a large island—larger, for example, than Great Island to the west that survives to this day.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_47464" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47464" style="width: 1502px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2.-detail-of-infrared-reflectogram-of-Hyde-County-shoreline.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-47464" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2.-detail-of-infrared-reflectogram-of-Hyde-County-shoreline.jpg" alt="" width="1502" height="1149" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2.-detail-of-infrared-reflectogram-of-Hyde-County-shoreline.jpg 1502w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2.-detail-of-infrared-reflectogram-of-Hyde-County-shoreline-400x306.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2.-detail-of-infrared-reflectogram-of-Hyde-County-shoreline-1024x783.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2.-detail-of-infrared-reflectogram-of-Hyde-County-shoreline-200x153.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2.-detail-of-infrared-reflectogram-of-Hyde-County-shoreline-768x588.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2.-detail-of-infrared-reflectogram-of-Hyde-County-shoreline-968x741.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2.-detail-of-infrared-reflectogram-of-Hyde-County-shoreline-636x487.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2.-detail-of-infrared-reflectogram-of-Hyde-County-shoreline-320x245.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2.-detail-of-infrared-reflectogram-of-Hyde-County-shoreline-239x183.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1502px) 100vw, 1502px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47464" class="wp-caption-text">Detail of British Museum’s infrared reflectogram of Hyde County shoreline.</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>The British Museum’s infrared reflectogram appears to answer the question. White’s graphite underdrawing seems to show, rather than a large island, an indistinct shape of either a small island or shoal off a more well-defined Bluff Point. The artist, after he had returned to England, may have been confused by data provided by Harriot or a missing sectional chart and then altered the original painting. Nevertheless, what caused White to paint the nonexistent island over the patch will remain a mystery.</p>
<p>The next familiar landmark appearing on White’s map as we and the Elizabethan explorers make our way westward is Great Island, just as it exists today southeast of Swan Quarter.</p>
<p>By the time Grenville’s party reached the lower part of Swan Quarter Bay, they had traveled approximately 25 miles — a full and tiring day in open boats, especially if they were being rowed. It was time for them to find an anchorage for the night. Few places are better for that at the mouth of the Pamlico River than Deep Cove below Judith Island.</p>
<p>For anyone who rides the Swan Quarter ferry to Ocracoke, Judith Island lies just off the ferry’s starboard side soon after departing the terminal.</p>
<p>The similarity between White’s 1585 map of the boot-like shape of land west of Swan Quarter Bay and the present-day complex of Judith Marsh, Judith Island and Swan Quarter Island is unmistakable. Deep Cove would have made an excellent protected anchorage (from waves, not mosquitoes) for the Elizabethans, just as it has on numerous occasions for this writer.</p>
<p>We can speculate that most of the following day, Wednesday, July 14, the explorers encountered poor weather. There was no journal entry for that day and White’s rendering of the Pungo River is badly distorted, indicating that it must have been difficult to take accurate bearings or to even see the shape of the river. White’s Pungo River is too wide and almost looks like a large bay of the Pamlico Sound rather than a southward flowing tributary of the Pamlico River.</p>
<p>Although it is angled northward and not eastward as it should be, the right-hand bend of the upper Pungo appears as an extension of the river pointing toward Lake Mattamuskeet. Other geographic features are more easily recognized. Both Broad Creek and Pantego Creek are depicted on White’s map, as is today’s Jordan Creek in its relative location about halfway down Pungo River on the west bank.</p>
<p>Manteo’s participation at this point is evermore assured because the Englishmen probably would have never found Aquascogoc without him. Neither would have the Roanoke Voyages historian David Quinn, whose analysis of the town’s location places it in the far eastern end of the Pungo River near present-day Scranton.</p>
<p>Comparing White’s underdrawing beneath the watercolor patch, it appears that the artist may have moved the symbol for Aquascogoc farther north on Pantego Creek, although this is only conjecture. The highest elevation of land along the creek, where the town would have been most likely located, is about 0.8 miles east of the present-day town of Pantego or 3.5 miles north of Belhaven.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_47463" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47463" style="width: 200px" class="wp-caption alignright"><a href="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3.-Aquascogoc-detail.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-47463" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3.-Aquascogoc-detail-200x158.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="158" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3.-Aquascogoc-detail-200x158.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3.-Aquascogoc-detail-400x317.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3.-Aquascogoc-detail-768x608.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3.-Aquascogoc-detail-636x504.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3.-Aquascogoc-detail-320x253.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3.-Aquascogoc-detail-239x189.jpg 239w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3.-Aquascogoc-detail.jpg 913w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47463" class="wp-caption-text">Detail of Aquascogoc location on the British Museum’s infrared reflectogram.</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>White seems to have made no drawings or paintings of the town of Aquascogoc or its people unless the images were lost during the Lane colony’s hasty departure from Roanoke Island in June 1586. There are differing opinions as to whether White remained on Roanoke Island with Harriot or returned to England with Grenville in September 1585. Nor do we know how many families lived at Aquascogoc or whether it was palisaded or an open plan. But we do know for certain that they visited the enigmatic town because of what happened two days later.</p>
<p>On June 15, 1585, Grenville’s expedition traveled farther up the Pamlico River to the town of Secotan, the primary objective of their trip. The town was considered the chief settlement of the Secotan nation, which likely included a confederation with the “kings” of Aquascogoc and Pomeiooc. The Secotans may have considered Wococon, or Ocracoke, to be part of their territory, too.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_47471" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47471" style="width: 1105px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4.-White-Secotan150dpi.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-47471 size-full" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4.-White-Secotan150dpi.jpg" alt="" width="1105" height="1800" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4.-White-Secotan150dpi.jpg 1105w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4.-White-Secotan150dpi-246x400.jpg 246w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4.-White-Secotan150dpi-629x1024.jpg 629w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4.-White-Secotan150dpi-123x200.jpg 123w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4.-White-Secotan150dpi-768x1251.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4.-White-Secotan150dpi-943x1536.jpg 943w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4.-White-Secotan150dpi-968x1577.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4.-White-Secotan150dpi-636x1036.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4.-White-Secotan150dpi-320x521.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4.-White-Secotan150dpi-239x389.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1105px) 100vw, 1105px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47471" class="wp-caption-text">Secotan, a town of surprising gentility and vibrancy. John White watercolor, 1585. ©The Trustees of the British Museum</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>Secotan is historically significant because it is widely accepted that White created at least eight of his most iconic images there. For lack of their own original, site-specific illustrations, many of White’s Secotan paintings and their reproductions today are used in visitor’s centers and museums from Jamestown to Plymouth Rock, and elsewhere, to represent Atlantic coast Native American culture during the contact period.</p>
<p>What is far less agreed upon and far more controversial is where Secotan was located. This is an unsolved mystery that is, arguably, as important as the fate of the Lost Colony because of White’s paintings.</p>
<p>It should not be a mystery at all. Numerous sources of information, as well as physical evidence, point to the west bank of today’s Bath Creek as the probable location of Secotan and not on Pungo River or south of the Pamlico River, as some scholars have suggested.</p>
<p>John White is partly to blame for the confusion. The badly distorted shape of the Pungo River on his “La Virginea Pars” map has caused some historians not personally familiar with the waters to lose their way. Significantly confounding the issue, on the same map White labeled “Secotan” on the south side of the Pamlico River and “Seco” directly across the river on the north side.</p>
<p>First, irrespective of archaeological surveys, let’s rule out Pungo River as the home of Secotan. In 1584 at Roanoke Island, the Native Americans briefed captains Arthur Barlowe and Philip Amadas, who led Raleigh’s first expedition in 1584, of the region’s geography and towns, including the various “kings” who ruled them. “Towards the Sunne set, foure daies journey, is situate a Town called Sequotan,” they explained.</p>
<p>We can deduce that the direction, towards the sunset, was southwest by west along the north shore of Pamlico Sound. A four-day journey by canoe would have been roughly 80 miles, just as it is today. Bath Creek is almost exactly 80 miles from the north end of Roanoke Island.</p>
<p>For the index listing of Secotan village in the book, “A New World,” by British Curator of Drawings Kim Sloan, in parentheses is written, “near Winsteadville, NC?” Winsteadville is a small community at the head of Jordan Creek on the west bank of the Pungo River. This obscure and unexplained reference by Sloan has confused more than one archaeologist. If it took Grenville’s flotilla a full day to travel from Aquascogoc to Secotan, it is unlikely that the latter was located just 8 miles away on the Pungo River.</p>
<p>A more decisive item of evidence is found on a crudely drawn but pivotal sketch map of “Raleigh’s Virginia” believed to have been dispatched in September 1585 with four letters from Ralph Lane at Roanoke Island to Sir Francis Walsingham and his son-in-law in England. Quinn wrote: “These five items (including the sketch map) are all of the greatest interest since they represent original correspondence from the first English settlement in North America.” That ought to be a milestone in the history of the Royal Mail.</p>
<p>The maker of the map is unknown. The technique is not White’s, nor is the handwriting Harriot’s. Since Lane mailed it, it may have been sketched by him or one of his assistants. Quinn calls it the “earliest English map of North America made from direct observation,” and there is no doubt that it was made in the summer of 1585.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_47470" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47470" style="width: 930px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/5.-1585-sketch-map-with-titles.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-47470 size-full" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/5.-1585-sketch-map-with-titles.jpg" alt="" width="930" height="709" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/5.-1585-sketch-map-with-titles.jpg 930w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/5.-1585-sketch-map-with-titles-400x305.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/5.-1585-sketch-map-with-titles-200x152.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/5.-1585-sketch-map-with-titles-768x585.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/5.-1585-sketch-map-with-titles-636x485.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/5.-1585-sketch-map-with-titles-320x244.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/5.-1585-sketch-map-with-titles-239x182.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 930px) 100vw, 930px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47470" class="wp-caption-text">Anonymous sketch map sent to London from Roanoke Island in September 1585. Original copy in author’s collection from British Archives courtesy of Robert J. Cain.</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>The map’s westward orientation and its geography suggests that it was copied by Theodore DeBry for his widely published 1590 engraved map, “Americae Pars.” Quinn observed that the sketch map’s value is that “it contributes several pieces of detail both to the narrative and to the nomenclature and topography of the general (‘La Virginea Pars’) map.”</p>
<p>Of particular interest among those items of detail is that the map locates Secotan on the north side of Pamlico River and on the west bank of a major southward flowing tributary of that river west of Pungo River. No other tributary better fits that description other than Bath Creek. “If the sketch-map of 1585 is taken as the best authority, (Secotan) was near the north bank of the Pamlico River, at, or not far, from the site of Bath,” wrote Quinn in 1955. Other authorities agree.</p>
<p>William Haag, an archaeologist who was contracted by the National Park Service in 1954 to complete a comprehensive cultural survey of the Outer Banks and its neighboring sounds observed that the knowledgeable Native Americans would have located their primary, summer residences on the north side of the river. “The prevailing summer breeze is from the south; thus the north shore is blown free of mosquitoes and the south shore is quieter, more humid, and insect ridden,” Haag wrote in his report.</p>
<p>Unlike Pomeiooc, which is marked on the sketch map as a palisaded town by a series of dots surrounded by a circle, Secotan is shown on the sketch map as an unenclosed town. White’s captivating painting of the town, a half bird’s-eye view of the streetscape, concurs. The artist must have spent quite a few hours composing the image, depicting numerous activities going on at the same time.</p>
<p>At Secotan, the Elizabethans encountered what was essentially a prototypical small American town with close knit family units, a local government, a place of worship, and a cemetery where their beloved ancestors were buried. There were picket-like fences around small garden plots, well-constructed houses with natural air conditioning, and sophisticated agricultural processes featuring rows of sweet corn, kidney beans, squash, peas, melons, pumpkins, sunflowers, and the broad leaves of young tobacco swaying in the summer breeze. The residents had festivals, cookouts, sports, dances, and occasional recitations of their history by village elders (their version of The History Channel).</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_47469" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47469" style="width: 1177px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6.-Fire-ceremony.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-47469 size-full" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6.-Fire-ceremony.jpg" alt="" width="1177" height="1248" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6.-Fire-ceremony.jpg 1177w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6.-Fire-ceremony-377x400.jpg 377w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6.-Fire-ceremony-966x1024.jpg 966w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6.-Fire-ceremony-189x200.jpg 189w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6.-Fire-ceremony-768x814.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6.-Fire-ceremony-968x1026.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6.-Fire-ceremony-636x674.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6.-Fire-ceremony-320x339.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6.-Fire-ceremony-239x253.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1177px) 100vw, 1177px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47469" class="wp-caption-text">A fire ceremony, John White watercolor, 1585. ©The Trustees of the British Museum</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>Given that some measure of White’s and Harriot’s work was propaganda intended to entice future settlers to Raleigh’s Virginia, we can still accept that Secotan was a town of surprising gentility and vibrancy.</p>
<p>In her book, “Indians and English: Facing Off in Early America,” New York University professor Karen Kupperman wrote: “White and Harriot together argued in the most forceful and effective way that the American natives were social beings, possessing all the characteristics necessary to civility; community life and the family structure … all informed by a religious sensibility that honored the human dependence on supernatural forces in the universe.” Kupperman’s characterization is certainly reflected in White’s painting of Secotan.</p>
<p>Unlike the Tiger’s matter-of-fact journal entries for Monday and Tuesday of that week, the visit to Secotan must have been more memorable: “The 15. we came to Secotan and were well intertayned there of the (residents).”</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_47468" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47468" style="width: 759px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7.-Broyling-of-fish.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-47468" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7.-Broyling-of-fish.jpg" alt="" width="759" height="676" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7.-Broyling-of-fish.jpg 759w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7.-Broyling-of-fish-400x356.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7.-Broyling-of-fish-200x178.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7.-Broyling-of-fish-636x566.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7.-Broyling-of-fish-320x285.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7.-Broyling-of-fish-239x213.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 759px) 100vw, 759px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47468" class="wp-caption-text">“The broyling of thier fish over th’ flame of fier.” John White watercolor, 1585. ©The Trustees of the British Museum</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>The Elizabethans may have arrived just in time for the Algonquian’s midsummer corn festival. A banquet was likely served to their guests from across the sea featuring smoked fish —“the best in the world,” wrote Barlowe in 1584 — and oysters, perhaps crab, venison, rabbit, toasted hickory nuts, bread from ground sunflower seeds, and, of course, sweet corn cooked in a broth or baked as bread.</p>
<p>The visit to Secotan on Bath Creek also included the wondrous benefits of eastern North Carolina “uppowac” or tobacco. In his 1588 paper, “A Briefe and True Report of the new found land of Virginia,” Harriot wrote: “The uppowoc is of so precious estimation amongst them, that they thinke their gods are marvelously delighted therwith.”</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_47467" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47467" style="width: 750px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8.-Pipe-stem-found-at-Beasley-Pt.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-47467" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8.-Pipe-stem-found-at-Beasley-Pt.jpg" alt="" width="750" height="533" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8.-Pipe-stem-found-at-Beasley-Pt.jpg 750w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8.-Pipe-stem-found-at-Beasley-Pt-400x284.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8.-Pipe-stem-found-at-Beasley-Pt-200x142.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8.-Pipe-stem-found-at-Beasley-Pt-636x452.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8.-Pipe-stem-found-at-Beasley-Pt-320x227.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8.-Pipe-stem-found-at-Beasley-Pt-239x170.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47467" class="wp-caption-text">A native-American pipe found along the west bank of Bath Creek. Author photo.</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>Contrary to popular belief, Raleigh’s Roanoke voyages did not introduce tobacco to England, where it was already in use, but according to Quinn, it was the Algonquian’s smoking pipe that changed English habits. Numerous whole or fragments of late-woodland era smoking pipes have been found along the west bank of Bath Creek over the years.</p>
<p>Wine may have also been featured at the banquet, either provided by the Secotans who served it “nouveau” for lack of means to preserve it, or the Elizabethans who kept it stored in casks. Surely, the party lasted well into the night with the air filled with the smells of woodsmoke, roasting meat and sweet-smelling tobacco.</p>
<p>The numerous fires throughout the town kept burning 24 hours a day were, no doubt, to keep the insects at bay. The Elizabethans were well acquainted with mosquitoes, having spent time in the West Indies before arriving at Ocracoke, but on the Pamlico they might have encountered their first voracious flies. White painted one, describing it as “A dangerous byting flye.” We know what he meant.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_47466" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47466" style="width: 983px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9.-A-dangerous-byting-flye.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-47466" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9.-A-dangerous-byting-flye.jpg" alt="" width="983" height="567" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9.-A-dangerous-byting-flye.jpg 983w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9.-A-dangerous-byting-flye-400x231.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9.-A-dangerous-byting-flye-200x115.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9.-A-dangerous-byting-flye-768x443.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9.-A-dangerous-byting-flye-968x558.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9.-A-dangerous-byting-flye-636x367.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9.-A-dangerous-byting-flye-320x185.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9.-A-dangerous-byting-flye-239x138.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 983px) 100vw, 983px" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47466" class="wp-caption-text">“A dangerous byting flye.” John White watercolor, 1585. ©The Trustees of the British Museum</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>When the festivities were over and everyone was exhausted, the English returned to their boats and anchored some distance away in the creek, again not wanting to trust their hosts entirely, who probably offered sleeping accommodations off the ground inside their well-built, bark-covered houses.</p>
<p>On Friday morning, Grenville’s men hoisted their anchors, raised their sails (or deployed their oars) and waved their goodbyes to their gracious hosts in order to continue their tour of the Pamlico.</p>
<p>There was never another meeting of the Elizabethans and the Secotans. One hundred years would pass before Europeans again ventured up the Pamlico River and by then, many of the families of the once hospitable town had long since been lost to measles, smallpox or even the common cold left behind by their English guests. The portentous sign that appeared so very terrible to the Algonquians in the spring of 1585 had come to pass.</p>
<p><em>Next: North Carolina&#8217;s least-known archaeological region </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 1585 Circumnavigation of Pamlico Sound</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2020/07/crossing-the-threshold-of-history/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Duffus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 04:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture & History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture and history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coastalreview.org/?p=47371</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="448" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-768x448.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-768x448.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-400x233.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-200x117.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-1024x598.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-968x565.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-636x371.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-320x187.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-239x139.jpg 239w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake.jpg 1155w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />Historian Kevin Duffus writes in the first part of his Crossing The Threshold of History series about the 1585 circumnavigation of Pamlico Sound by the English to create a map of the estuary and a visual record of those who lived there.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="448" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-768x448.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-768x448.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-400x233.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-200x117.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-1024x598.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-968x565.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-636x371.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-320x187.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-239x139.jpg 239w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake.jpg 1155w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /><p><figure id="attachment_47372" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47372" style="width: 1200px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-47372 size-full" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1-White-LaVirgineaPars-150dpi.jpeg" alt="" width="1200" height="2406" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1-White-LaVirgineaPars-150dpi.jpeg 1200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1-White-LaVirgineaPars-150dpi-200x400.jpeg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1-White-LaVirgineaPars-150dpi-511x1024.jpeg 511w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1-White-LaVirgineaPars-150dpi-100x200.jpeg 100w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1-White-LaVirgineaPars-150dpi-768x1540.jpeg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1-White-LaVirgineaPars-150dpi-766x1536.jpeg 766w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1-White-LaVirgineaPars-150dpi-1021x2048.jpeg 1021w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1-White-LaVirgineaPars-150dpi-968x1941.jpeg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1-White-LaVirgineaPars-150dpi-636x1275.jpeg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1-White-LaVirgineaPars-150dpi-320x642.jpeg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/1-White-LaVirgineaPars-150dpi-239x479.jpeg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47372" class="wp-caption-text">Map by John White, 1585 &#8220;La Virginea Pars.&#8221; Courtesy, The British Museum</figcaption></figure></p>
<p><em>Coastal Review Online is featuring the research, findings and commentary of author Kevin Duffus</em><i>.</i></p>
<p><em>First of three parts</em></p>
<p>Pamlico Sound is traversed each day by innumerable people aboard ferries, fishing boats and sailboats.</p>
<p>Most, however, probably don’t consider or are even aware of the intrepid explorers who first circumnavigated the vast estuary for the purposes of creating a map of the region and a visual record of the people who lived there.</p>
<p>It happened this month, 435 years ago, the second of Walter Raleigh’s three expeditions to establish an English colony on the North American continent.</p>
<p>At Ocracoke Inlet on Sunday, July 11, 1585, July 21 on our modern calendar, 60 men aboard four small boats “victualled for eight dayes&#8221; cast their lines from their mother ships and headed north to the mainland of today’s Hyde County. What lay ahead for the expedition was mostly unknown, terra incognita, both cartographically and historically. But upon their return from their portentous journey seven days later, cartography and history would be forever changed.</p>
<p>The general facts of the reconnaissance mission may be known to some readers while lesser known but consequential details within this article may come as a surprise to others. Among the more noteworthy achievements of the 1585 expedition is that it produced, according to the leading authority on the subject, “the most careful detailed piece of cartography for any part of North America to be made in the sixteenth century.”</p>
<p>Indeed, there was not another accurate map made of the shoreline of today’s Hyde County between the Pungo River and the Long Shoal River until the charts of the U.S. Coast Survey nearly 265 years later.</p>
<p>Of all the historians and writers who have told this story — mostly as a prelude to the alluring tale of The Lost Colony — none match the monumental academic achievements of the late David Beers Quinn, an Irish historian of “immense industry and erudition” who devoted his scholarly life to the subject of early English trans-Atlantic explorations. This writer had the good fortune to interview Quinn in 1984.</p>
<p>The praise of Quinn may be hardly sufficient. The comprehensive collection of contemporary records and historical analyses of those documents contained in his two volume colossal masterwork, &#8220;The Roanoke Voyages 1584-1590,&#8221; is extraordinary and unequaled. That is where we safely find the waypoints to retrace the 1585 circumnavigation of Pamlico Sound.</p>
<p>But Quinn, like all historians, was human, and although his mistakes were rare, one concerns his analysis of the location of the major Outer Banks passage through which the 1585 expedition entered Pamlico Sound and commenced their journey, then named Wococon Inlet.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_47373" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47373" style="width: 1269px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-47373 size-full" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2-White-Price-Moseley-composite.jpg" alt="" width="1269" height="334" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2-White-Price-Moseley-composite.jpg 1269w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2-White-Price-Moseley-composite-400x105.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2-White-Price-Moseley-composite-1024x270.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2-White-Price-Moseley-composite-200x53.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2-White-Price-Moseley-composite-768x202.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2-White-Price-Moseley-composite-968x255.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2-White-Price-Moseley-composite-636x167.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2-White-Price-Moseley-composite-320x84.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2-White-Price-Moseley-composite-239x63.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1269px) 100vw, 1269px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47373" class="wp-caption-text">White-Price-Moseley maps composite showing hook-shape and well. Composite: Kevin Duffus</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>Quinn and other notable historians following his trail have suggested that Wococon was a “now vanished inlet through Portsmouth Island.” However, two maps created in 1585, the “Virginea la Pars” and a more crudely drawn sketch map, depict Wococon Inlet with a conspicuous hook on the island’s southwestern extremity, which compares well with Jonathan Price’s rendering of Ocracoke Island and its inlet in 1795, 210 years later.</p>
<p>Furthermore, it may have been the freshwater well surviving to this day at Ocraocke’s Springer’s Point marked on Edward Moseley’s 1733 map, that attracted the Elizabethans to the inlet in the first place.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_47374" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47374" style="width: 1216px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-47374 size-full" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3-Grenville.png" alt="" width="1216" height="1310" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3-Grenville.png 1216w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3-Grenville-371x400.png 371w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3-Grenville-951x1024.png 951w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3-Grenville-186x200.png 186w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3-Grenville-768x827.png 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3-Grenville-968x1043.png 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3-Grenville-636x685.png 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3-Grenville-320x345.png 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3-Grenville-239x257.png 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1216px) 100vw, 1216px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47374" class="wp-caption-text">Sir Richard Grenville at age 29. Courtesy, National Portrait Gallery, London</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>The 1585 expedition of seven ships was led by Raleigh’s cousin, 43-year-old<strong> </strong>Sir Richard Grenville, whose flagship Tiger grounded on the perplexing shallows of Ocracoke Inlet while making its way to a safe anchorage inside the bar.</p>
<p>Even though the accident was termed a “wreck” due to fears that the keel had been irreparably fractured, the badly leaking 160-ton galleon was re-floated, patched up and eventually was returned to England. While the ship’s carpenters turned to their arduous task of careening the ship and making repairs, and other sailors replenished the fleet’s water casks at the old well, Grenville and his officers decided to go on a tour of the adjacent sound.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_47375" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47375" style="width: 200px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-47375 size-thumbnail" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4-Tiger-200x145.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="145" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4-Tiger-200x145.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4-Tiger-400x291.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4-Tiger-320x233.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4-Tiger-239x174.jpg 239w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/4-Tiger.jpg 477w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47375" class="wp-caption-text">Elizabethan ship Tiger. Courtesy, The British Museum</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>The record of their itinerary strongly suggests that they knew where they were going. The excursion was provisioned for eight days, indicating that they had a reasonably good idea how far they had to travel.</p>
<p>According to the expedition’s journal, a week earlier Master John Arundell and the Croatoan Manteo had sailed to the mainland on an unspecified mission, likely to inform one or more of the towns of the larger group to follow, but that is only inferred.</p>
<p>Quinn also speculated that it was possible that Raleigh’s first expedition in 1584 led by captains Arthur Barlowe and Philip Amadas, with Manteo’s guidance, had reconnoitered some of the same shoreline of Pamlico Sound based on a remarkable story they were told of a shipwreck, likely Spanish, estimated to have occurred 26 or so years earlier on Wococon.</p>
<p>Native Americans related that “some of the dwellers of Sequotan” who were on Wococon perhaps gathering shells to make wampum, aided the shipwreck survivors. Had the estimated date of 1558 by the Secotans been slightly off, the shipwreck may have been one of the two Spanish “fragattas” lost in a storm off Core Banks during the 1561 expedition of Spanish Florida governor Ángel de Villafañe.</p>
<p>When the four boats departed Ocracoke Inlet, they contained a veritable who’s who of prominent Elizabethan captains, soldiers, scientists and surveyors. Aboard the lead vessel, a London tilt boat or ferry, was the red-haired Grenville beneath an awning to keep him out of the blistering July sun.</p>
<p>Ralph Lane, who would serve as governor of the colony on Roanoke Island in the coming year, rode in a ship’s pinnace of probably 30 feet in length that had been built at Puerto Rico to replace one that sank off Portugal on their way to the New World. Crowded among 20 or so others accompanying Lane was 25-year-old mathematician Thomas Harriot, the expedition scientist, ethnographer and Algonquian translator. Manteo likely sat near Harriot, excited to be triumphantly touring his land after a year in England.</p>
<p>Two smaller ship’s boats rounded out the flotilla, one carrying Capt. Philip Amadas, “admiral of Virginia,” the other including John White, the expedition surveyor and artist. Other scientific members of the party may have included a physician, a miner, and specialists in metallurgy, husbandry, apothecary and alchemy.</p>
<p>Harriot&#8217;s and White’s presence had the most lasting impact. Their collaboration produced a vivid visual and narrative record of the journey that rose to the quintessence of Elizabethan culture and science. Amadas’s contribution by the end of the circumnavigation, contrary to the expedition’s explicit instructions to treat the indigenous people of the Pamlico “with all humanitie, courtesie, and freedom so as to win them from paganism,” was no less than a haunting lesson of the capacity of English cruelty and the caprice of 16th-century Christian virtues.</p>
<p>The record does not reveal the weather conditions on that Sunday in July but from our own experience sailing on the Pamlico for many years we know the range of possibilities.</p>
<p>It may have been one of those sweltering “slick cam” days as they still say down on Core Sound, in which case the oarsmen suffered greatly; or the departure may have been delayed to wait for a strengthening afternoon sea breeze out of the southeast that would have sped them along on a starboard reach; or, more often than not in July, a blast furnace of wind out of the southwest may have filled their sails and tossed them across the sound’s notoriously short choppy waves. Summer thunderstorms and black squalls over the course of the week were surely encountered, delaying their progress.</p>
<p>While underway on a steamy day, the officers and the common sailors may not have been distinguishable by their clothing. Most were dressed in baggy, knee-length breeches or canvas Dutch-type slops and a loose-fitting woolen shirt with a wool monmouth cap atop their shaved heads despite the heat, to protect them from the sun.</p>
<p>The familiar accoutrements of a well-dressed Elizabethan nobleman— linen cartwheel ruffs with lace, elaborate doublets, leather jerkins, hose or legging s— were likely left behind, except for maybe Grenville, Lane and Amadas, who dressed in their finest prior to meeting their Algonquian hosts, including donning light corselets and swords.</p>
<p>In the event that the Elizabethans were not cordially welcomed, they also carried aboard the boats weapons, which included light muskets, swords, round or oval shields, long bows, half pikes and battleaxes.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_47377" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47377" style="width: 1155px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-47377 size-full" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake.jpg" alt="" width="1155" height="674" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake.jpg 1155w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-400x233.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-200x117.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-768x448.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-1024x598.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-968x565.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-636x371.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-320x187.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/6-Detail-of-Pomeiooc-and-lake-239x139.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1155px) 100vw, 1155px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47377" class="wp-caption-text">Detail of Pomeiooc and lake. Courtesy, British Museum</figcaption></figure></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">Their first destination was the isolated town of Pomeiooc at the southeastern end of Lake Mattamuskeet, then called the great lake Paquippe. The course there took them about 20 miles across open water to the mainland and then 10 more miles along north shore of the sound, which looked much different than it does now. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 16px;">Sandy hills and ridgelines later named Pungo Bluffs, probably remnants of an ancient oceanfront, were crowned by towering old growth forests shimmering on the horizon like a mirage from many miles out. </span>Because the expedition journal indicates that they did not arrive at  Pomeiooc until Monday, July 12, they must have spent their first night rafted together and anchored in a cove southwest of the village.</p>
<p>What must that have been like, 60 men crowded cheek by jowl in the small open boats on a relatively unknown shore at the mercy of the weather and fearsome creatures watching them in the dark? Surely they must have felt some apprehension, despite reassurances from Manteo that all would be well.</p>
<p>As they paralleled the mainland, it became Harriot&#8217;s and White’s task to triangulate the shoreline and adjacent islands as accurately as possible for a map, the map Quinn called “a landmark in the history of English cartography.”</p>
<p>Stowed aboard the four vessels were their tools of the trade: a cross staff, a sailing compass, an instrument for the variation of the compass, an instrument for the declination of the needle, watch-clocks “which dothe shewe &amp; divide the howers by the minutes,” tables that calculated the trajectory of astronomical bodies, parchment for the production of “marckes” or sectional maps, and writing instruments of ink and lead.</p>
<p>As Quinn observed, when on shore the surveyors and their assistants were constantly attended by men carrying their writing materials, instruments, and plane tables on which Harriot and White drew bearings and distances on “paper royal” to compose their preliminary maps:</p>
<p>&#8220;The latitude of every ‘Notatious’ place was to be entered in the journal and on the map. A uniform scale was to be maintained at all costs. Distances of capes, headlands and hills, depth and breadth of inlets and rivers, elevations of land, with the variations in vegetation and land-use, location of springs, occurrence of shell-fish (especially those with pearls), and the various sorts of trees, were all to be entered both in the journal and on the map.&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words, the surveyors were thorough. We can closely scrutinize White’s watercolor map, “La Virginea Pars,” and find numerous geographic features that survive to this day, and by doing so we can go where they went 435 years ago.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_47378" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47378" style="width: 1280px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-47378 size-full" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7-Wimble-manuscript-with-title.png" alt="" width="1280" height="962" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7-Wimble-manuscript-with-title.png 1280w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7-Wimble-manuscript-with-title-400x301.png 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7-Wimble-manuscript-with-title-1024x770.png 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7-Wimble-manuscript-with-title-200x150.png 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7-Wimble-manuscript-with-title-768x577.png 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7-Wimble-manuscript-with-title-968x728.png 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7-Wimble-manuscript-with-title-636x478.png 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7-Wimble-manuscript-with-title-320x241.png 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/7-Wimble-manuscript-with-title-239x180.png 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47378" class="wp-caption-text">Wimble manuscript map showing “Y” of Far Creek/Waupopin Creek. Illustration: Kevin Duffus</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>We begin retracing their route to the town of Pomeiooc, which was located close to the lake and west of a distinctive “Y” shaped bay. That bay is likely the similarly shaped branches of Far Creek and Waupopin Creek near Engelhard. This analysis disagrees with Quinn who thought it was Wysocking Bay where they landed to visit the village.</p>
<p>One hundred and fifty years after White drew them, albeit somewhat exaggerated in size, the same “Y’ shape of the two creeks appears on both James Wimble’s manuscript map of 1733 and his 1738 chart, although he mistakenly places the two creeks north of Long Shoal even though no similarly shaped creeks exist there today.</p>
<p>It was up today’s Far Creek where the Elizabethans rowed or sailed to find the remarkable palisaded town and its people.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_47379" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47379" style="width: 2072px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-47379 size-full" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8-Pomeiooc.jpg" alt="" width="2072" height="2079" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8-Pomeiooc.jpg 2072w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8-Pomeiooc-400x400.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8-Pomeiooc-1021x1024.jpg 1021w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8-Pomeiooc-200x200.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8-Pomeiooc-768x771.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8-Pomeiooc-1531x1536.jpg 1531w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8-Pomeiooc-2041x2048.jpg 2041w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8-Pomeiooc-968x971.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8-Pomeiooc-636x638.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8-Pomeiooc-320x321.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8-Pomeiooc-239x240.jpg 239w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/8-Pomeiooc-55x55.jpg 55w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 2072px) 100vw, 2072px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47379" class="wp-caption-text">The town of Pomeiooc. Courtesy, The British Museum</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>White wasted no time once they arrived, based on the product of his labors but unfortunately, we know nothing about the interaction and activities of Grenville, Lane, Amadas, Harriot and the other expedition officials, for the journal simply notes their arrival on July 12. Four illustrations were made by White in the span of a day including an extraordinary bird’s-eye view of 18 structures including individual homes, a temple and longhouses, one of which housed their “king” and his family.</p>
<p>The village was surrounded by a stockade fence, not to protect them from hostile enemies but to discourage the many large predators roaming the countryside including pumas, bears and wolves. Worth noting in the overhead view of the town was a man standing alongside a dog that was judged by Quinn as “the earliest appearance of this animal in an American drawing so far as is known.”</p>
<p>Manteo, no doubt, aided White in selecting and comforting his subjects about what the artist was doing. In addition to drawing a Pomeiooc woman carrying her child on her back, and a well-clothed village elder with hints of gray in his hair, White depicted the wife of the village chief with her 8- to 10-year old daughter, the “king’s” daughter, that reveals the only evidence of the presence or interaction between the English visitors and their host. The girl is holding a doll wearing Elizabethan clothing, perhaps representing Elizabeth I.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_47380" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-47380" style="width: 1347px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-47380 size-full" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9-wifedaughterPomeioocChief.jpg" alt="" width="1347" height="2353" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9-wifedaughterPomeioocChief.jpg 1347w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9-wifedaughterPomeioocChief-229x400.jpg 229w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9-wifedaughterPomeioocChief-586x1024.jpg 586w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9-wifedaughterPomeioocChief-114x200.jpg 114w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9-wifedaughterPomeioocChief-768x1342.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9-wifedaughterPomeioocChief-879x1536.jpg 879w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9-wifedaughterPomeioocChief-1172x2048.jpg 1172w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9-wifedaughterPomeioocChief-968x1691.jpg 968w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9-wifedaughterPomeioocChief-636x1111.jpg 636w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9-wifedaughterPomeioocChief-320x559.jpg 320w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9-wifedaughterPomeioocChief-239x417.jpg 239w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1347px) 100vw, 1347px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-47380" class="wp-caption-text">Wife and daughter of Pomeiooc chief. Courtesy, The British Museum</figcaption></figure></p>
<p>Without more information, we can only speculate how the tour of the village and surrounding land might have gone, partly based on similar instances of “foreigners” arriving for the first time at an indigenous village.</p>
<p>The children might have run from the strange-looking, wobbly-walking Elizabethans while the adults stood and stared. Manteo introduced the village “werowance” or chief to the sweaty, overdressed Grenville and his party, while Harriot and his assistants went off to view the great lake nearby. The guests were likely offered some food while both groups spoke pleasantries neither side could understand but nods and smiles were sufficient confirmation of friendship.</p>
<p>By the end of the day, Grenville and his party retired to their boats anchored on Far Creek, preferring to sleep on the water than experience the unknowns on shore. At the first blush of dawn the next morning, they headed west for the long journey to the towns of Aquascogoc and Secotan.</p>
<p><em>Next: <a href="https://coastalreview.org/2020/07/mapping-pamlico-sound-the-secotan-site/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mapping Pamlico Sound: The Secotan Site</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pamlico Sound Ferry Alternate Schedule</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2017/08/pamlico-sound-ferry-alternate-schedule/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 16:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCDOT Ferry Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coastalreview.org/?p=22708</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="514" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-768x514.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-768x514.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-400x268.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-1280x857.jpg 1280w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-200x134.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-1536x1028.jpg 1536w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-2048x1371.jpg 2048w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-1024x686.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-720x482.jpg 720w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-968x648.jpg 968w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />Because of the current emergency restrictions on visiting Ocracoke Island, the North Carolina Department of Transportation Ferry Division adopted Monday an alternate schedule for its Cedar Island-Ocracoke and Swan Quarter-Ocracoke routes.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="514" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-768x514.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-768x514.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-400x268.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-1280x857.jpg 1280w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-200x134.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-1536x1028.jpg 1536w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-2048x1371.jpg 2048w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-1024x686.jpg 1024w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-720x482.jpg 720w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PamlicoFerrySunset-968x648.jpg 968w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /><p><strong>OCRACOKE</strong> – The North Carolina Department of Transportation Ferry Division announced Sunday an alternate schedule for the Pamlico Sound Ferry due to the current emergency restrictions in place for visiting for Ocracoke Island.</p>
<p>The alternate schedule for its Cedar Island-Ocracoke and Swan Quarter-Ocracoke routes began Monday.</p>
<p>The schedule will be as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li>Swan Quarter to Ocracoke: 7 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.</li>
<li>Ocracoke to Swan Quarter: 7 a.m. and 3:30 p.m.</li>
<li>Cedar Island to Ocracoke: 7 a.m. and 4 p.m.</li>
<li>Ocracoke to Cedar Island: 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.</li>
</ul>
<p>Visitors are reminded that Hyde County’s mandatory evacuation order for visitors remains in effect. Only residents, property owners, emergency workers, vendors and critical infrastructure personnel with Ocracoke re-entry documentation will be allowed onto Ocracoke-bound ferries. Law enforcement officers will be on hand at ferry terminals to enforce the re-entry restrictions.</p>
<p>The routes will resume their regular summer schedules when the emergency orders are lifted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;A Frozen Pamlico Sound&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2015/02/frozen-pamlico-sound/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coastalreview.org/?p=6994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="718" height="539" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Frozen-Pamlico-Sound-by-Randi-Machovec-e1424776372729.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Frozen-Pamlico-Sound-by-Randi-Machovec-e1424776372729.jpg 718w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Frozen-Pamlico-Sound-by-Randi-Machovec-e1424776372729-400x300.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Frozen-Pamlico-Sound-by-Randi-Machovec-e1424776372729-200x150.jpg 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 718px) 100vw, 718px" />Outer Banks artist Randi Machovec's hands were frozen as she snapped this shot last week of her pier on the Pamlico Sound in Waves, a small town on Hatteras Island. "A rare sight for us islanders," Machovec wrote.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="718" height="539" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Frozen-Pamlico-Sound-by-Randi-Machovec-e1424776372729.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Frozen-Pamlico-Sound-by-Randi-Machovec-e1424776372729.jpg 718w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Frozen-Pamlico-Sound-by-Randi-Machovec-e1424776372729-400x300.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Frozen-Pamlico-Sound-by-Randi-Machovec-e1424776372729-200x150.jpg 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 718px) 100vw, 718px" /><h4><a href="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Frozen-Pamlico-Sound-by-Randi-Machovec-e1424776372729.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6995" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Frozen-Pamlico-Sound-by-Randi-Machovec-e1424776372729.jpg" alt="Frozen Pamlico Sound by Randi Machovec" width="718" height="539" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Frozen-Pamlico-Sound-by-Randi-Machovec-e1424776372729.jpg 718w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Frozen-Pamlico-Sound-by-Randi-Machovec-e1424776372729-400x300.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Frozen-Pamlico-Sound-by-Randi-Machovec-e1424776372729-200x150.jpg 200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 718px) 100vw, 718px" /></a></h4>
<h4><strong>Photo of the Week: Feb. 23 &#8211; March 1, 2015</strong></h4>
<h5><em>Photograph by Randi Machovec of Waves, N.C.</em></h5>
<p>Outer Banks artist Randi Machovec&#8217;s hands were frozen as she snapped this shot last week of her pier on the Pamlico Sound in Waves, a small town on Hatteras Island. &#8220;A rare sight for us islanders,&#8221; Machovec wrote. &#8220;I think I&#8217;ll stay inside.&#8221;</p>
<p><div class="photo-note"><em>This photo was submitted to Coastal Review Online’s photography contest. We want your best shots to tell a story about North Carolina’s coast by capturing its culture, nature, people or news. Visit our <a href="/about/submission-guidelines/">submission guidelines</a> for contest details. #CROphoto </em></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Restoring  the Land and Water of Pamlico Sound</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2012/03/restoring-the-land-and-water-of-pamlico-sound/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jan DeBlieu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Habitat Restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitat restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamlico Sound]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coastalreview.org/?p=1745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="400" height="400" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/oysters.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="oysters, Hyde series" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/oysters.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/oysters-200x200.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/oysters-166x166.jpg 166w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/oysters-150x150.jpg 150w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/oysters-271x271.jpg 271w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/oysters-55x55.jpg 55w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" />An unlikely alliance of farmers and environmentalists is working to restore the hydrology of Hyde County and to make Pamlico Sound more hospitable for oysters.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="400" height="400" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/oysters.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="oysters, Hyde series" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/oysters.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/oysters-200x200.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/oysters-166x166.jpg 166w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/oysters-150x150.jpg 150w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/oysters-271x271.jpg 271w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/oysters-55x55.jpg 55w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /><p><em>First of two parts</em></p>
<p>ENGELHARD &#8212; This summer ground will be broken in northeast Hyde County for a restoration project conceived by unlikely partners—a farmer and environmentalists.</p>
<p>The farmer hails from a community of avid outdoorsmen and women in one of the most conservative areas of the country, a group that doesn’t generally cotton to environmentalists.</p>
<p>Working alongside him will be restoration staff members from the N.C. Coastal Federation. They all hope to put a whole landscape back in order.</p>
<p>When the last shovelfuls of dense black peat are put into modified dikes and sloughs on Lux Farms, much of the agricultural drainage from 1,400 acres will be removed from Pamlico Sound and redirected into its natural flow through wetlands toward the north.</p>
<p>As future phases move forward, the farmer will be able to store drainage water in irrigation ponds for use in dry times. The installation of flood gates will help protect farm soils from poisonous salt water as the world’s seas rise.</p>
<p>And improvements in water quality in Pamlico Sound will enable conservationists to build low-profile oyster reefs offshore, enhancing local fisheries and helping provide a buffer from storm surges.</p>
<h3>It Began With an Oyster</h3>
<table class="floatright" style="width: 400px;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/CRO/2012-3/old-oyster.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<span class="caption"><em>A researcher in 1907 drops a buoy on an experimental oyster reef in Pamlico Sound. Photo: Freshwater and Marine Image Bank, Washington University Libraries.</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The story of the landscape-scale restoration work in Hyde County begins, as many tales do, with a remarkably small player: the humble <a href="Content.aspx?Key=0dec568b-85f4-4e84-86d1-8a449db4055f&amp;title=Oyster+Habitat">oyster</a>.</p>
<p>In 2004, the federation received a grant from the <a href="http://www.cwmtf.net/" target="_self" rel="noopener">N.C. Clean Water Management Trust Fund</a> to write a coast-wide blueprint for resuscitating the state’s badly depleted oyster population. The federation targeted oysters for a reason: These energetic filter feeders remove copious amounts of pollution from estuaries. In a few hours a single oyster can clean a 10-gallon tank of muddy water.</p>
<p>But the state’s once-great oyster reefs have been decimated by a combination of overfishing, disease and habitat destruction. The grant required the federation to convene a group of experts to figure out how the oyster population could be brought back.</p>
<p>The federation established work groups on the north, central and southern coasts. The northern group’s assignment was complicated by the sheer size of the region’s waters, including Pamlico Sound.</p>
<p>Picture a dozen scientists, conservationists and fisheries biologists in a room, all talking about the research they’ve done on oysters and trying to figure out what more is needed. This writer was there and was impressed by the brain power. Trouble was, no one seemed to have a game plan for moving forward.</p>
<p>Previous work by researchers, the Nature Conservancy and the N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries had found that oyster larvae, or spat, would attach to chunks of limestone stacked in underwater piles. Limestone reefs were being built to replace historic oyster rocks that had been covered by sediment or destroyed by oyster dredges.</p>
<p>Building rock piles in the sound was expensive, and oyster spat must depend on currents to carry them to suitable habitat. Unless new reefs were built in places where currents would deposit spat, the work would be wasted.</p>
<p>But how could the group figure out the seasonal track of subsurface currents in Pamlico Sound? Such detailed flow studies had never been done.</p>
<p>An answer came not from the academic brain trust but from an Ocracoke waterman named Gene Ballance, who had painstakingly reconstructed maps of oyster reefs drawn in the 1880s drawn by Navy researcher Francis Winslow. Ballance is an Ocracoke native with thick glasses, a wide, friendly grin and an abiding love for oysters. He views the fate of the oyster and the commercial fishing industry as intertwined, and he is not willing to let go of either one.</p>
<p>His reconstruction of the Winslow maps showed a necklace of oyster reefs off the Hyde County mainland. If currents had carried oyster spat to those locations in the 1880s, it was likely they would still do so.</p>
<table class="floatleft" style="width: 200px;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/CRO/2012-3/gene-ballance.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<span class="caption"><em>Gene Ballance</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>What’s more, the historic reefs lay in a region that had been shown by a Nature Conservancy study to have some of the highest biodiversity in southeast U.S. waters. New oyster reefs would provide habitat for other estuarine creatures—as well as knocking down storm waves that were causing severe erosion along the Hyde mainland.</p>
<p>There was just one problem. Stormwater from agricultural fields carried sediment, bacteria and plumes of tannic, overly fresh water into the sound just off Hyde County, ruining the waters for oysters.</p>
<h3>A ‘Natural Partnership’</h3>
<p>Wilson Daughtry and his wife, Debby, own Alligator River Growers. He is known in Hyde County as the go-to man for onions. In a county of soybean, corn and cotton fields, the Daughtries have made a name for themselves growing high-value crops like broccoli and the sweet onions that thrive in the black peat soils. Besides farming his own land, Wilson manages the adjacent Lux Farms property for several partners.</p>
<p>The federation in 2005 convened a group to look for wetland restoration projects that could help clean up the local waters for oyster restoration. Daughtry was one of the farmers invited to attend. The goal of the group was to find sites where water from ditches and canals could be diverted into wetlands, removing some of the runoff that poured into Pamlico Sound.</p>
<p>Daughtry and Mac Gibbs, director of the county’s agricultural extension service, had been collaborating on ideas for what were called tail water projects, in which drainage could be held in low-lying farm fields instead of being pumped to the sound.  The water could be used for irrigation, saving money on pumping expense. “When we heard that the Coastal Federation was interested in holding back water to improve the sound for oysters,” Gibbs said, “it seemed like a natural partnership.”</p>
<p>The federation had something the farmers lacked: a working knowledge of how to write grants and experience with hydrologic restoration at <a href="Content.aspx?Key=891fd057-1374-4ef4-bab1-b2180431b8f7&amp;title=North+River+Farms">North River Farms</a> in Carteret County.</p>
<p>Daughtry is a respected farmer with a sense of humor. One afternoon when the federation staff stopped by his farm office to chat (a folksy custom that’s become an art form in Hyde County), he casually pulled out an infrared satellite image of Lux Farms. “Take a look at that,” he said.</p>
<p>The image showed a wide swath of red running through the middle of the farm—low, wet land, most of it grown up in the unusual bog known as pocosin. An excited expression spread across the face of Christine Miller, an assistant director at the federation. “Is that—is that an old slough going through the middle of the farm?” she asked.</p>
<p>Wilson rubbed his chin. “Some people say it is.”</p>
<p>The image showed that water from the western end of Lux Farms had historically drained north toward what is now the Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge. If the slough could be restored, much of Lux Farm’s drainage could be removed from Pamlico Sound.</p>
<p>They were looking at a project the size of which had seldom been done—and that, they knew, had the potential to become a national model for restoration.</p>
<p><em>Tuesday: A plan takes shape</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
