<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Drew Ball, Author at Coastal Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://coastalreview.org/author/drewball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://coastalreview.org/author/drewball/</link>
	<description>A Daily News Service of the North Carolina Coastal Federation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 18:12:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Chemours is doubling down on its toxic history: NRDC</title>
		<link>https://coastalreview.org/2025/10/chemours-doubling-down-on-its-toxic-history-nrdc/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Ball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cape Fear River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GenX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water quality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coastalreview.org/?p=101486</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="576" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Chemours-thermal-oxidizer-Fayetteville-768x576.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Chemours&#039; thermal oxidizer is shown during construction in 2019. Photo: Chemours" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Chemours-thermal-oxidizer-Fayetteville-768x576.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Chemours-thermal-oxidizer-Fayetteville-400x300.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Chemours-thermal-oxidizer-Fayetteville-200x150.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Chemours-thermal-oxidizer-Fayetteville.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" />Chemours is not a company that can be trusted to expand its operations responsibly, and it's an example of the national PFAS pollution crisis, writes Drew Ball of the Natural Resources Defense Council.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="768" height="576" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Chemours-thermal-oxidizer-Fayetteville-768x576.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Chemours&#039; thermal oxidizer is shown during construction in 2019. Photo: Chemours" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 20px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Chemours-thermal-oxidizer-Fayetteville-768x576.jpg 768w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Chemours-thermal-oxidizer-Fayetteville-400x300.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Chemours-thermal-oxidizer-Fayetteville-200x150.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Chemours-thermal-oxidizer-Fayetteville.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px" /><div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img decoding="async" width="1200" height="900" src="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Chemours-thermal-oxidizer-Fayetteville.jpg" alt="Chemours' Fayetteville Works site in 2019. Photo: Chemours" class="wp-image-101312" srcset="https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Chemours-thermal-oxidizer-Fayetteville.jpg 1200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Chemours-thermal-oxidizer-Fayetteville-400x300.jpg 400w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Chemours-thermal-oxidizer-Fayetteville-200x150.jpg 200w, https://coastalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Chemours-thermal-oxidizer-Fayetteville-768x576.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Chemours&#8217; Fayetteville Works site in 2019. Photo: Chemours</figcaption></figure>
</div>


<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Guest Commentary </em></h2>



<p><em>To stimulate discussion and debate, <a href="https://coastalreview.org/about/submissions/guest-column/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Coastal Review welcomes differing viewpoints on topical coastal issues</a>.</em> <em>Note: <em>This piece was updated Nov. 3 to correct an erroneous statistic regarding Chemours&#8217; proposed expansion.</em></em></p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p>One of the state’s most egregious corporate polluters has evaded public accountability for years. Now, the company is seeking to expand its output of toxic chemicals in eastern North Carolina.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Since the mid 1970s the Chemours chemical manufacturing facility in Fayetteville has been spewing toxic PFAS into the air and water, contaminating the air and drinking water, food and bodies of water of a half-million people in the southeast region. The public was unaware of this until 2017, when researchers at NC State University detected high levels of the chemical GenX in the river&#8217;s drinking water. The revelation was so egregious community group Clean Cape Fear engaged the <a href="https://www.wunc.org/environment/2024-02-29/un-human-rights-condemns-dupont-chemours-cape-fear-river-pollution-pfas" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">U.N. Human Rights Council</a> to find Chemours and its parent company DuPont had committed business-related human rights abuses and called for accountability. Exposure to PFAS is known to cause certain types of cancers, immune system suppression, and developmental issues. But even after the news broke about this public health crisis in 2017, Chemours continued to produce PFAS and poisoning the Cape Fear River region.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Beyond <a href="https://www.nrdc.org/stories/drinking-water-crisis-north-carolina-ignored" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">polluting the Cape Fear River</a>, which supplies drinking water to more than 500,000 people downstream of Chemours’ discharge pipes, Chemours’ airborne PFAS emissions have poisoned <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wer.11091#:~:text=North%20Carolina%20has%20at%20least,%5D%2C%202017%2C%202023a)." target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">at least 7,000 private drinking water wells</a> across ten counties. This is not just a historical issue – it&#8217;s an ongoing crisis. Eight years after learning about GenX in North Carolina’s tap water and state regulators still do not know the full scope of groundwater contamination to the region.&nbsp;</p>



<p>Despite this legacy of harm across southeastern North Carolina, the company has recently applied to NC DEQ (Department of Environmental Quality) for an air permit to dramatically expand its Fayetteville chemical production operations and increase its PFAS production and waste. Chemours has demonstrated a pattern of corporate misconduct, <a href="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/26022024/un-chemours-pfas-north-carolina/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">concealing</a> information about the dangers of its water and air pollution from regulators and the public for decades. The company <a href="https://www.deq.nc.gov/news/press-releases/2021/01/26/deq-issues-notice-violation-chemours" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">has violated</a> court orders to curb PFAS pollution. And, earlier this year, the state expanded its PFAS testing zone, ordering <a href="https://www.wral.com/news/local/nc-chemours-pfas-testing-expansion-march-2025/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Chemours to test for PFAS in an additional 150,000 private wells</a> in six counties – a sign of how far these toxic chemicals have spread across the state.  </p>



<p>This is not a company that can be trusted to expand its operations responsibly, and it is one local example of the&nbsp; PFAS pollution crisis, which is now a nationwide problem. Thoughtful and common-sense<s> </s>federal solutions were recently put in place, but&nbsp; are now being rescinded.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>



<p>In 2024, the Biden Administration’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) restricted six PFAS chemicals (GenX/HFPO-DA, PFBS, PFHxS PFNA, PFOA, and PFOS)<s>,</s> under the Safe Drinking Water Act, which the agency estimated could benefit up to 105 million people nationwide. But the Trump administration is now in the process of trying to rescind some of those restrictions that would have helped reduce PFAS pollution in public tap water. The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and its partners are <a href="https://www.nrdc.org/press-releases/epa-seeks-roll-back-pfas-drinking-water-rules-keeping-millions-exposed-toxic-forever" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">opposing</a> the EPA’s proposed rollbacks and have turned to the courts for protection. &nbsp;</p>



<p>Until federal regulators issue clear guidance and protections for PFAS, it is up to state agencies to protect our health and natural resources. In North Carolina, that means DEQ must reject Chemours’ air permit application and do its job to protect North Carolinians from being further poisoned by this company’s toxic chemical pollution.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p><em>Opinions expressed by the authors are not necessarily those of Coastal Review or our publisher, the&nbsp;<a href="http://nccoast.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">North Carolina Coastal Federation</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
